| Literature DB >> 35337384 |
Nisar Ahmad1, Jan Muhammad2, Khalil Khan2, Wajid Ali2, Hina Fazal3, Mohammad Ali2, Latif-Ur Rahman4, Hayat Khan2, Muhammad Nazir Uddin2, Bilal Haider Abbasi5, Christophe Hano6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prunella vulgaris is medicinally important plant containing high-valued chemical metabolites like Prunellin which belong to family Lamiaceae and it is also known as self-heal. In this research, calli culture were exposed to differential ratios of gold (Au) and silver (Ag) nanoparticles (1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 2:1 and 3:1) along with naphthalene acetic acid (2.0 mg NAA) to investigate its antimicrobial potential. A well diffusion method was used for antimicrobial properties.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial potential; Calli; Chemically synthesized silver and gold nanoparticles; Prunella vulgaris
Year: 2022 PMID: 35337384 PMCID: PMC8957128 DOI: 10.1186/s13065-022-00816-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Chem ISSN: 2661-801X
NPs and NAA applied for callus culture of prunella vulgaris
| Treatment | NPs + NAA (Auxin) |
|---|---|
| T1 | Full MS with 2.0 NAA |
| T2 | Wild plant |
| T3 | ½ MS with 2.0 NAA |
| T4 | AgAu 1:2 + 2.0 NAA |
| T5 | AgAu 1:3 + 2.0 NAA |
| T6 | AgAu 2:1 + 2.0 NAA |
| T7 | AgAu 3:1 + 2.0 NAA |
| T8 | AgAu 1:1 + 2.0 NAA |
| T9 | Au + 2.0 NAA |
| T10 | Ag + 2.0 NAA |
To examine the effect of diverse nanoparticles (NPs) and naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) on callus propagation, fresh calli cultures were taken at the end of 1 month of explants incubation on NAA media. The calli cultures were then sub-culture to fresh media which composed of differential ratios of gold (Au) and silver (Ag) nanoparticles alone or in mixture with NAA
Fresh and dry weight of Prunella vulgaris extract
| Media used | Callus fresh weight (g) | Callus dry weight (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Full MS 2.0 NAA | 1.1606 ± 0.07b | 0.292 ± 0.012a |
| Wild plant | 0.4972 ± 0.01c | 0.0559 ± 0.021b |
| ½ MS 2.0 NAA | 1.522 ± 0.087a | 0.0321 ± 0.003 c |
| AgAu 1:2 + 2.0 NAA | 0.1770 ± 0.01d | 0.0163 ± 0.001e |
| AgAu 1:3 + 2.0 NAA | 0.1275 ± 0.01d | 0.0214 ± 0.003d |
| AgAu 2:1 + 2.0 NAA | 0.5323 ± 0.03c | 0.0482 ± 0.007b |
| AgAu 3:1 + 2.0 NAA | 0.1905 ± 0.01d | 0.0119 ± 0.003e |
| AgAu 1:1 + 2.0 NAA | 0.1311 ± 0.01d | 0.0107 ± 0.003e |
| Au + 2.0 NAA | 0.1337 ± 0.01d | 0.011 ± 0.001e |
| Ag + 2.0NAA | 0.598 ± 0.04c | 0.039 ± 0.0012bc |
To know the fresh weight (FW) the inoculated calli were taken and then weighed. For extract preparation, wild plants extract and the fresh calli were dried in an oven and then weighed (DW). All the values are mean ± SE (standard errors). Column labeled with different letters of least significant differences (LSD values) displayed significant variation (α < 0.05)
The microorganisms which were used, namely, Escherichia coli (E. coli), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Salmonella typhi (S. typhi), Erwinia caratovora (E. caratovora) and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (A. tumefaciens; Gram negative bacteria) Bacillus atrophaeus (B. atrophaeus), Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis), (Gram positive bacteria). One fungal strain, Candida albicans (Gram positive fungus)
| Microorganisms | Type | Authentications No. | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gram negative | MBC-MIC-003 | PCSIR Lab (Peshawar) | |
| Gram negative | MBC-MIC-051 | PCSIR Lab (Peshawar) | |
| Gram negative | MBC-MIC-104 | PCSIR Lab (Peshawar) | |
| Gram positive | MBC-MIC-203 | PCSIR Lab (Peshawar) | |
| Gram positive | MBC-MIC-208 | PCSIR Lab (Peshawar) | |
| Gram negative | MBC-MIC-171 | PCSIR Lab (Peshawar) | |
| Gram negative | MBC-MIC-153 | PCSIR Lab (Peshawar) | |
| Fungi | MBC-MIC-304 | PCDIR Lab (Peshawar) |
The above microorganisms were collected from Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (PCSIR) Laboratories Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
Antimicrobial potential of calli cultures of Prunella vulgaris induced by NAA and nanoparticles
| Media used | Sample | Extract weight | mg/ul | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full MS 2.0 NAA | 1.1606 | 0.292 | 1 mg | – | – | 10 ± 0.2d | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2 mg | – | 10.4 ± 0.1c | 10.3 ± 0.1d | – | 15.3 ± 0.2c | – | 10.6 ± 0.1d | – | |||
| Wild plants | 0.4972 | 0.0559 | 1 mg | 10.5 ± 0.3b | 20 ± 0.2b | 10.6 ± 0.3d | – | 10.5 ± 0.3d | – | – | 10.9 ± 0.3b |
| 2 mg | 10.5 ± 0.2b | 20.4 ± 0.2b | 15.3 ± 0.1c | 10.2 ± 0.1d | 15 ± 0.1c | 20.4 ± 0.3b | 10 ± 0.2d | – | |||
| ½ MS 2.0 NAA | 1.522 | 0.0321 | 1 mg | – | 10.7 ± 0.3c | 10.4 ± 0.2d | 10 ± 0.1d | 9.9 ± 0.3d | 20.2 ± 0.3b | 20.5 ± 0.3b | – |
| 2 mg | – | – | 10.5 ± 0.3d | 9.9 ± 0.2d | 15.4 ± 0.2c | – | – | – | |||
| AgAu 1:22.0 NAA | 0.1770 | 0.0163 | 1 mg | – | – | 10.2 ± 0.1d | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2 mg | 10.3 ± 0.2b | – | 10.1 ± 0.1d | – | 10.5 ± 0.1d | – | – | – | |||
| AgAu 1:32.0 NAA | 0.1275 | 0.0214 | 1 mg | 9.9 ± 0.2b | – | – | – | – | – | 10.3 ± 0.1d | – |
| 2 mg | 10.2 ± 0.3b | – | – | 15.3 ± 0.3c | 10.3 ± 0.2d | – | 9.9 ± 0.2d | – | |||
| AgAu 2:12.0 NAA | 0.5323 | 0.0482 | 1 mg | – | 10.8 ± 0.3c | 10.7 ± 0.2d | 10.1 ± 0.1c | 15.1 ± 0.3c | – | 10.5 ± 0.2d | – |
| 2 mg | – | – | 15.3 ± 0.3c | 15.4 ± 0.1c | 20.5 ± 0.4b | – | 15.3 ± 0.3c | – | |||
| AgAu 3:12.0 NAA | 0.1905 | 0.0119 | 1 mg | – | – | 10.3 ± 0.1d | 10.2 ± 0.2d | – | – | 15.1 ± 0.3c | – |
| 2 mg | – | – | 10.4 ± 0.1d | 15.3 ± 0.2c | – | – | – | – | |||
| AgAu 1:12.0 NAA | 0.1311 | 0.0107 | 1 mg | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 2 mg | 5.3 ± 0.1c | 5.0 ± 0.1e | – | 6.1 ± 0.2e | – | 7.1 ± 0.2d | – | ||||
| Au2.0 NAA | 0.1337 | 0.011 | 1 mg | 9.9 ± 0.1b | – | 10.9 ± 0.2d | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2 mg | 10.3 ± 0.2b | – | 25.7 ± 0.3b | – | – | – | – | – | |||
| Ag2.0 NAA | 0.598 | 0.039 | 1 mg | 10 ± 0.1b | – | 10.3 ± 0.1d | 20 ± 0.3b | 10.3 ± 0.1d | – | – | 10.8 ± 0.2b |
| 2 mg | 10.3 ± 0.2b | – | 10.5 ± 0.1d | 25 ± 0.3ab | 10.5 ± 0.1d | – | – | – | |||
| DMSO | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Antibiotics (Az, Cip, Clot and Strep | 2 mg | 22.1 ± 0.4a | 28 ± 0.3a | 34 ± 0.5a | 27 ± 0.4a | 28.7 ± 0.3a | 30 ± 0.4a | 28 ± 0.5a | 30.1 ± 0.4a |
() E. coli, () P. aeruginosa, () S. typhi, () B. atrophaeus, () B. subtilis, () A. tumefaciens, () E. caratovora and () C. albicans. All the values are mean ± SE (standard errors). Column labeled with different letters of least significant differences (LSD values) displayed significant variation (α < 0.05)
Fig. 1Pictorial presentation of antimicrobial potential of differential ratios of nanoparticles, wild plant, untreated calli cultures and calli cultures of Prunella vulgaris (a) effect of AgNPs with NAA against E. coli (b) wild plant against Pseudomonas aeroginosa (c) AuNPs with NAA against Salmonella typhi (d) AgNPs with NAA against Bacillus atrophaeus (e) AgAuNPs (2:1) with NAA against Bacillus subtilis (f) wild plant against Agrobacterium tumefaciens (g) untreated calli cultures against Erwinia caratovora (h) AgNPs with NAA against Candida albicans (i) control
Fig. 2Different mechanisms of action of NPs in bacterial cell. The gold and silver NPs interact with MDR microbes and activate oxidative stress mechanisms. It also inhibits enzymes and proteins as well as epigenetic changes in DNA.