| Literature DB >> 35337337 |
Hongjiao Yu1, Yingnan Lin1, Yue Zhong1, Xiaolan Guo1, Yuyin Lin1, Siqi Yang1, Jinglin Liu1, Xinran Xie1, Yaowei Sun1, Dong Wang2, Bing Li1, Pixin Ran3, Jianwei Dai4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Particular matter 2.5 (PM2.5) is one of the most important air pollutant, and it is positively associated with the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the precise underlying mechanisms through which PM2.5 promotes the development of COPD remains largely unknown.Entities:
Keywords: AT2-to-AT1 transition; Alveolar epithelium; COPD; PM2.5
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35337337 PMCID: PMC8957194 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-022-01996-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Fig. 1PM2.5 causes abnormal respiratory system in mice. C57BL/6 mice were exposed to biomass fuel PM2.5 for six months and analyzed on indicated days. Lung function was examined in anesthetized mice using DSI animal pulmonary function test machine. A Scheme for biomass fuel PM2.5 long-term exposure system modeling. B Dynamic weight changes in control and long-term PM2.5-exposed mice. C Lung function test of CONTROL and PM2.5 exposure group. Cdyn: dynamic lung compliance. FEV (200)/FVC: ratio of forced expiratory volume to forced vital capacity at 200 ms. PM2.5 exposure reduced dynamic Lung Compliance and FEV (200)/FVC. D HE staining of CONTROL and PM2.5-exposed mice. Scale bar = 200 μm. E Mean Alveolar Number (MAN) was counted in CONTROL and PM2.5-exposed mice. F Mean Linear Intercept (MLI) was examined in CONTROL and PM2.5-exposed mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Comparisons between two groups (CONTROL vs PM2.5 exposure) were analyzed by unpaired t test. Data presented are mean ± SD. n ≥ 4
Fig. 2PM2.5 induced differential m6A modification in COPD. PM2.5 exposure reduced AT1/AT2 ratio and unaffected the proliferation ability of AT2. A Immunofluorescence staining of CONTROL and PM2.5-exposed lung tissues for AT1 and AT2. AT1 cells were marked with HOPX and AT2 cells were marked with SPC. Scale bar = 50 μm. B Quantitative of AT1/total cell ratio per 20 × field. C Quantitative of AT2/total cell ratio per 20 × field. D Immunofluorescence staining of CONTROL and PM2.5-exposed lung tissues for AT1 and Cleaved Caspase 3. Scale bar = 50 μm E Quantitative analysis of the ratio of Cleaved Caspase 3 positive AT1 cells vs total AT1 cells per 20 × field. F Quantitative of AT1/AT2 ratio per 20 × field. G Immunofluorescence SPC and Ki67 in CONTROL and PM2.5-exposed lung tissues. Ki67 is a marker for cells in proliferating phase. The orange arrows indicate the Ki67 staining and the white arrows indicate a co-localization of SPC and Ki67. Scale bar = 50 μm. H Quantitative of SPC+Ki67+ cell number per 20 × field. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Comparisons between two groups (CONTROL vs PM2.5 exposure) were analyzed by unpaired t test. Data presented are means ± SD. The experiments were repeated at least three times (n ≥ 3)
Fig. 3PM2.5 is likely to influence the repair of alveolar damage by affecting the transdifferentiation of AT2 to AT1. A The culture process of mouse alveolar organoids. Scale bar = 500 μm or 100 μm as indicated. B Immunofluorescence staining of alveolar organoids in CONTROL group and PM2.5-exposed alveolar organoids for HOPX, SPC and Ki67 in the alveolar differentiation phase day 4. Scale bar = 50 μm. C Quantitative of AT1/AT2 ratio per 20 × field. D Quantitative of Ki67+/total ratio per 20 × field. E, F The mRNA expression of cell cycle related genes Cdc25c and Cyclin B1 in the alveolar differentiation phase day 4. G Immunofluorescence staining of intermediate AT2-AT1 cell process marker CLDN4 in the alveolar differentiation phase day 4. Scale bar = 50 μm. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Comparisons between two groups (CONTROL vs PM2.5 exposure) were analyzed by unpaired t test. Data presented are means ± SD. The experiments were repeated at least three times (n ≥ 3)
Fig. 4AT2 damage and repair induced by PM2.5 exposure may be related to the down-regulation of cell differentiation genes. A Visualization of differentially expressed genes in alveolar maintaining phase. The red dots represent up-regulated differentially expressed genes, the blue dots represent down-regulated differentially expression genes and the grey dots represent genes with no significant change. B Pathway analysis of down-regulated genes in alveolar maintaining phase. C GO analysis of down-regulated genes in alveolar maintaining phase. D Visualization of differentially expressed genes in alveolar differentiation phase. The red dots represent up-regulated differentially expressed genes, the blue dots represent down-regulated differentially expression genes and the grey dots represent genes with no significant change. E Pathway analysis of down-regulated genes in alveolar differentiation phase. F GO analysis of down-regulated genes in alveolar differentiation phase
Fig. 5Down regulation of VEGFA may be the cause of abnormal AT2 damage and repair. A Venn diagram of down-regulated genes in alveolar maintain phase and alveolar differentiation phase. B GO analysis of intersecting down-regulated genes. C RT-qPCR was performed to verify down-regulated genes related to cell differentiation. D PPI analysis of down-regulated genes related to cell differentiation. E Hypothetical diagram of VEGFA regulating the differentiation process of AT2 cells. PM2.5 exposure reduced VEGFA expression leading to impaired AT2 to AT1 transition. ****p < 0.0001. Two-way ANOVA Ordinary. CONTROL vs PM2.5 exposure. Data presented are means ± SD. The experiments were repeated at least three times (n ≥ 3)