Literature DB >> 3533701

Gallstone dissolution therapy. Current status and future prospects.

H Fromm.   

Abstract

Findings by several groups of investigators have provided a reliable data base that supports a nonoperative approach toward the management of so-called silent gallstones. Considerable progress has been made in the medical dissolution treatment of selected patients with cholesterol gallstones. Ursodeoxycholic acid, and, more recently, a combination of ursodeoxycholic and chenodeoxycholic acids have been shown to be both effective and safe in dissolving gallstones that are predominantly composed of cholesterol. A drawback of the bile acid dissolution therapy lies in a significant recurrence rate after treatment is discontinued. Currently, several new methods of gallstone treatment are under study, which involve either the injection of a cholelitholytic solution, such as methyl tert-butyl ether, into the gallbladder or the use of mechanical means, such as excorporeally induced shock waves, to disintegrate gallstones. These treatments, however, are effective only if the stones are composed mainly of cholesterol without significant admixtures of calcium salts, pigment, or mucus. Most of the treatment failures are probably related to the presence of calcifications that are not visible on conventional radiographs. Future improvements of gallstone dissolution therapy can be expected from the following possible developments: improvement in ability to predict gallstone composition; dissolution of calcium salt-, pigment-, and mucus-containing stones; early treatment, before calcifications occur; combination of chemical and mechanical methods of treatment; stimulation of gallbladder contraction; prevention of stone recurrence after dissolution; and synthesis of new cholelitholytic agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3533701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  13 in total

1.  Aggressive extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of gall bladder stones within wider treatment criteria: fragmentation rate and early results.

Authors:  G Meiser; M Heinerman; G Lexer; O Boeckl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Gall stones.

Authors:  I A Bouchier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-03-03

Review 3.  Biliary extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  B Rawat; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1990 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Extracorporeal biliary lithotripsy and direct chemolitholysis-an integrated concept.

Authors:  W Domschke
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1989-10

5.  The economic burden of gallstone lithotripsy. Will cost determine its fate?

Authors:  W H Nealon; F Urrutia; D Fleming; J C Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Non-surgical treatment of gall stones: many contenders but who will win the crown?

Authors:  I A Bouchier
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Choledocholithiasis--in vivo stone dissolution using methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE).

Authors:  W R Murray; G LaFerla; G M Fullarton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Current alternatives to open cholecystectomy in the management of gallstones.

Authors:  A L Leahy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Effects of dietary fat and fatty acids on sterol balance in hamsters.

Authors:  B I Cohen; N Ayyad; T Mikami; Y Mikami; E H Mosbach
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.880

10.  Inhibition of human gall bladder mucus synthesis in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Rhodes; A Allen; R H Dowling; G Murphy; T W Lennard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.