| Literature DB >> 35336706 |
Wenyue Ma1, Xiaolan Liao1, Chong Wang2, Ya Zhang1.
Abstract
Replant disease caused by continuous cropping obstacles commonly occurs in a Lilium brownii consecutive monoculture. To reveal the mechanisms contributing to the continuous cropping obstacles of L. brownii, four cropping patterns (fallow, L. brownii-rice rotation, newly planted L. brownii, and 2-year L. brownii consecutive monoculture) were designed, and Illumina MiSeq (16S rDNA and ITS) was utilized to detect shifts in the microbial community in the rhizosphere. Our result showed that planting of L. brownii significantly reduced soil pH. Consecutive monoculture of L. brownii can significantly decrease the diversity and abundance of soil bacteria, but markedly increase the diversity and abundance of soil fungi. Under the four planting pattern treatments, the changes in soil pH were consistent with the changes in the Shannon diversity index of soil bacterial communities, whereas we observed a negative correlation between soil pH and Shannon diversity index for fungi. The relative abundance of Lactobacillales significantly increased in soils of L. brownii consecutive monoculture, while Acidobacteriales, Solibacterales, and Xanthomonadales increased in soils of L. brownii-rice rotation and newly planted L. brownii. Collectively, this work aimed to elucidate the relationship between the L. brownii planting patterns and soil microbiome, thereby providing a theoretical basis for screening new biological agents that may contribute to resolving continuous cropping obstacles of L. brownii.Entities:
Keywords: Lilium brownii; continuous cropping obstacle; microbial diversity; rhizosphere soil microorganism
Year: 2022 PMID: 35336706 PMCID: PMC8950473 DOI: 10.3390/plants11060824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The pH values in three growth stages of L. brownii.
| Treatment | pH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Seedling Emergence Period | Flourishing Period | (Bulblet) Expanding Stage | |
| RT | 6.69 ± 0.03 a | 6.47 ± 0.05 b | 6.53 ± 0.02 b |
| RC | 6.50 ± 0.16 b | 5.91 ± 0.05 c | 5.65 ± 0.11 d |
| TC | 5.25 ± 0.11 e | 4.65 ± 0.07 g | 4.61 ± 0.07 g |
| CC | 4.91 ± 0.04 f | 4.40 ± 0.03 h | 4.33 ± 0.07 h |
Note: Numbers with different letters in the same column are significantly different according to Duncan’s shortest significant range test (p < 0.05).
Variance analysis of different cropping patterns (ANOVA).
| Sources of Variation | Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom | Mean Square | F Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A between factors | 8.8856 | 3 | 2.9619 | 491.111 | 0.0001 |
| B between factors | 0.0055 | 2 | 0.0028 | 0.457 | 0.6386 |
| A × B | 18.4177 | 6 | 3.0696 | 508.978 | 0.0001 |
| Error | 0.1447 | 24 | 0.006 | ||
| Total variation | 27.4535 | 35 |
Note: A: Cropping pattern factor; B: Time factor.
The α-diversity of rhizosphere microbial in four planting patterns.
| Treatment | Bacteria | Fungi | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chao1 | Shonnon | Chao1 | Shonnon | |
| RT | 4867.00 ± 4.58 b | 9.95 ± 0.03 a | 230.50 ± 0.79 b | 4.53 ± 0.04 b |
| RC | 4892.00 ± 2.65 a | 9.90 ± 0.08 a | 296.47 ± 3.61 a | 3.83 ± 0.21 c |
| TC | 4018.33 ± 2.52 c | 8.53 ± 0.04 b | 155.90 ± 3.32 c | 1.96 ± 0.13 d |
| CC | 3475.00 ± 1.73 d | 7.65 ± 0.03 c | 291.73 ± 3.05 a | 6.02 ± 0.23 a |
Note: Numbers with different letters in the same column are significantly different according to Duncan’s shortest significant range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Composition of the main microorganism under four cropping patterns ((A): 15 bacterial orders; (B): 30 fungal genera).
Population abundance of the dominant fungi genera under four cropping patterns (%).
| Genera | RT | RC | TC | CC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0 | 0.01 ± 0.002 e | 0 | 0.65 ± 0.030 g |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0.01 ± 0.002 d | 1.91 ± 0.080 d |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0.02 ± 0.005 d | 0.54 ± 0.020 h |
|
| 0.78 ± 0.040 a | 0.03 ± 0.005 d | 0.13 ± 0.026 c | 2.34 ± 0.078 c |
|
| 0.16 ± 0.020 c | 0.87 ± 0.044 a | 0.87 ± 0.020 a | 2.76 ± 0.095 b |
|
| 0 | 0.22 ± 0.035 b | 0 | 1.80 ± 0.044 d |
|
| 0.02 ± 0.002 d | 0.01 ± 0.001 e | 0 | 0.84 ± 0.046 f |
|
| 0 | 0.15 ± 0.020 c | 0.27 ± 0.055 b | 6.11 ± 0.078 a |
|
| 0.53 ± 0.030 b | 0 | 0 | 0.12 ± 0.017 i |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.64 ± 0.017 g |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.56 ± 0.017 h |
|
| 0 | 0.03 ± 0.001 d | 0 | 0.93 ± 0.010 e |
Numbers with different letters in the same column are significantly different according to Duncan’s shortest significant range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Composition of the top 20 families under four cropping patterns.
Figure 3Timeframe for the field experiment and soil sampling RT: No O. sativa and L. brownii cultivation during the experimental period; RC: L. brownie-O. sativa-L. brownii rotation plots; TC: newly planted plots; CC: Two-year consecutively monocultured plots.