| Literature DB >> 35336672 |
Jawad Ali1, Ibadullah Jan1, Hidayat Ullah1, Nazeer Ahmed1, Mukhtar Alam1, Rafi Ullah1, Mohamed El-Sharnouby2, Hosny Kesba3, Mustafa Shukry4, Samy Sayed5, Taufiq Nawaz6.
Abstract
Drought stress restricts the growth of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) primarily by disrupting its physiological and biochemical functions. This study evaluated the role of Ascophyllum nodosum extract (ANE) in improving the drought tolerance of okra. Drought stress (3 days (control), 6 days (mild stress), and 9 days (severe stress)) and 4 doses of ANE (0, 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.3%) were imposed after 30 days of cultivation. The results indicate that drought stress decreases the chlorophyll content (total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid) but increases the activity of anthocyanin, proline, and antioxidant enzymes such as ascorbate peroxidase (APX), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT). Physiological and biochemical plant disturbances and visible growth reduction in okra under drought stress were significantly decreased by the application of ANE foliar spray. ANE spray (0.3%) significantly increased the chlorophyll abundance and activity of anthocyanin, proline, and antioxidants (APX, POD, and CAT). ANE regulated and improved biochemical and physiological functions in okra under both drought and control conditions. The results of the current study show that ANE foliar spray may improve the growth performance of okra and result in the development of drought tolerance in okra.Entities:
Keywords: Abelmoschus esculentus L.; abiotic stress; antioxidant enzymes; chlorophyll content; phenolic compounds; seaweed
Year: 2022 PMID: 35336672 PMCID: PMC8949179 DOI: 10.3390/plants11060790
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Chlorophyll-a content of okra. The figure shows the effect of the interaction of Ascophylum nodosum extract and drought stress.
Effects of Ascophylum nodosum extract on the chlorophyll-a (µg mL−1), chlorophyll-b (µg mL−1), total chlorophyll (µg mL−1), carotenoid (µg mL−1), and anthocyanin (mg g−1) contents of okra under water deficient conditions.
| Treatments | Chlorophyll-a (µg mL−1) | Chlorophyll-b (µg mL−1) | Total Chlorophyll (µg mL−1) | Carotenoid (µg mL−1) | Anthocyanin (mg g−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANE Levels (%) | |||||
| 0 | 24.56 d | 12.55 d | 37.11 d | 8.67 d | 0.6479 d |
| 1 | 26.32 c | 13.23 c | 39.55 c | 9.50 c | 0.6929 c |
| 2 | 28.05 b | 14.35 b | 42.40 b | 10.60 b | 0.7121 b |
| 3 | 30.61 a | 16.35 a | 46.96 a | 12.40 a | 0.7635 a |
| Tukey HSD | 1.3196 * | 0.6821 * | 1.7369 * | 0.4310 * | 0.0216 * |
| Drought Stress (DS) | |||||
| Control | 34.01 a | 16.77 a | 50.78 a | 12.85 a | 0.5235 c |
| Mild stress | 25.64 b | 13.67 b | 39.31 b | 9.85 b | 0.7160 b |
| Severe stress | 22.50 c | 11.92 c | 34.32 c | 8.17 c | 0.8728 a |
| Tukey HSD | 1.0346 * | 0.5348 * | 1.3617 * | 0.3379 * | 0.0169 * |
| ANE × DS | 2.9863 * | 1.5435 * | 3.9304 * | 0.9752 * | 0.0488 * |
Means followed by the same letter in each column are not significantly different. * = significant at p < 0.05.
Figure 2The effects of Ascophylum nodosum extract and drought stress conditions on the chlorophyll-b content of okra.
Figure 3The effects of Ascophylum nodosum extract and drought stress conditions on the total chlorophyll content of okra.
Figure 4The effects of Ascophylum nodosum extract and drought stress conditions on the carotenoid content of okra.
Figure 5The effects of Ascophylum nodosum extract and drought stress conditions on the anthocyanin content of okra.
Effects of Ascophylum nodosum extract on the proline (µmole g−1), APX (µ mg−1 protein), POD (µ mg−1 protein), and CAT (µ mg−1 protein) contents of okra under water deficient conditions.
| Treatments | Proline (µmole g−1) | APX (µ mg−1 Protein) | POD (µ mg−1 Protein) | CAT (µ mg−1 Protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANE Levels (%) | ||||
| 0 | 20.99 d | 16.87 d | 24.29 d | 19.52 d |
| 1 | 22.81 c | 17.81 c | 25.51 c | 20.45 c |
| 2 | 23.58 b | 18.83 b | 26.95 b | 21.77 b |
| 3 | 25.65 a | 19.79 a | 28.34 a | 22.89 a |
| Tukey HSD | 0.8686 * | 0.4857 * | 0.6849 * | 0.6565 * |
| Drought Stress(DS) | ||||
| Control | 15.98 c | 17.236 c | 24.67 c | 19.93 c |
| Mild stress | 23.74 b | 18.25 b | 26.15 b | 20.96 b |
| Severe stress | 30.06 a | 19.94 a | 28.01 a | 22.58 a |
| Tukey HSD | 0.6810 * | 0.3808 * | 0.5370 * | 0.5147 * |
| ANE × DS | 1.9656 * | 1.0990 * | 1.5499 * | 1.4857 * |
Means followed by the same letter in each column are not significantly different. * = significant at p < 0.05.
Figure 6Proline accumulation in okra and the effects of Ascophylum nodosum extract and drought stress.
Figure 7The effects of Ascophylum nodosum extract and drought stress conditions on the APX activity of okra.
Figure 8The effects of Ascophylum nodosum extract and drought stress conditions on the POD activity of okra.
Figure 9The effects of Ascophylum nodosum extract and drought stress conditions on the CAT activity of okra.