| Literature DB >> 35336566 |
Qipeng Tan1, Tiandong Zhang1, Shaocheng Wu1, Jiachen Gao1,2, Bin Song1.
Abstract
Partial discharge (PD) is a common phenomenon of insulation aging in air-insulated switchgear and will change the gas composition in the equipment. However, it is still a challenge to diagnose and identify the defect types of PD. This paper conducts enclosed experiments based on gas sensors to obtain the concentration data of the characteristic gases CO, NO2, and O3 under four typical defects. The random forest algorithm with grid search optimization is used for fault identification to explore a method of identifying defect types through gas concentration. The results show that the gases concentration variations do have statistical characteristics, and the RF algorithm can achieve high accuracy in prediction. The combination of a sensor and a machine learning algorithm provides the gas component analysis method a way to diagnose PD in an air-insulated switchgear.Entities:
Keywords: air-insulated switchgear; fault classification; gas detection; partial discharge (PD); random forests
Year: 2022 PMID: 35336566 PMCID: PMC8948649 DOI: 10.3390/s22062395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Experiment Platform: (a) schematic diagram of the experiment platform; (b) layout of the experiment platform.
Figure 2Four types of simulated defects: (a) metal protrusion, (b) air gap between the metal conductor and the insulator, (c) pollution on the insulator surface, and (d) charged metal particles.
The voltage applied for each defect.
| Type | Metal Protrusion | Air Gap between the Metal Conductor and the Insulator | Pollution on the Insulator Surface | Charged Metal Particles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applied Voltage (kV) | 8 | 13 | 8.2 | 12.8 |
| Breakdown Voltage (kV) | 11.4 | 18.6 | 11.8 | 12.8 |
Figure 3The volume fraction of characteristic gases over time: (a) metal protrusion, (b) air gap between the metal conductor and the insulator, (c) pollution on the insulator surface, and (d) charged metal particles.
Figure 4The framework of the algorithm and the optimization process.
Numbering of four defect types.
| Type | Metal Protrusion | Air Gap between the Metal Conductor and the Insulator | Pollution on the Insulator Surface | Charged Metal Particles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Figure 5Generation of test set decision tree.
Confusion matrix of the RF classifier.
| Prediction | Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuality | |||||
| Type 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Type 2 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 0 | |
| Type 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | |
| Type 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
Figure 6Performance of random forest classifier.
Confusion matrix of the SVM classifier.
| Prediction | Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuality | |||||
| Type 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Type 2 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 2 | |
| Type 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | |
| Type 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
Confusion matrix of the LR classifier.
| Prediction | Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuality | |||||
| Type 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Type 2 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | |
| Type 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | |
| Type 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |