| Literature DB >> 35336523 |
Mohamed Esmail Karar1,2, Bandar Alotaibi3,4, Munif Alotaibi1.
Abstract
Blood cancer, or leukemia, has a negative impact on the blood and/or bone marrow of children and adults. Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are two sub-types of acute leukemia. The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) and artificial intelligence have allowed for the development of advanced technologies to assist in recently introduced medical procedures. Hence, in this paper, we propose a new intelligent IoMT framework for the automated classification of acute leukemias using microscopic blood images. The workflow of our proposed framework includes three main stages, as follows. First, blood samples are collected by wireless digital microscopy and sent to a cloud server. Second, the cloud server carries out automatic identification of the blood conditions-either leukemias or healthy-utilizing our developed generative adversarial network (GAN) classifier. Finally, the classification results are sent to a hematologist for medical approval. The developed GAN classifier was successfully evaluated on two public data sets: ALL-IDB and ASH image bank. It achieved the best accuracy scores of 98.67% for binary classification (ALL or healthy) and 95.5% for multi-class classification (ALL, AML, and normal blood cells), when compared with existing state-of-the-art methods. The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of our proposed IoMT framework for automated diagnosis of acute leukemia tests. Clinical realization of this blood diagnosis system is our future work.Entities:
Keywords: acute leukemia; computer-aided diagnosis; generative adversarial networks; internet of medical things; wireless microscopic imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35336523 PMCID: PMC8949784 DOI: 10.3390/s22062348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Three different samples from microscopic blood data set, representing: (a) Acute lymphocytic leukemia; (b) Acute myelogenous leukemia; and (c) Normal blood cells.
Summary of microscopic image data sets for the different blood conditions considered in this study.
| Condition of Blood Cells | Data Set | Number of Images |
|---|---|---|
| ALL | ALL-IDB | 179 |
| AML | ASH Image Bank | 77 |
| Normal | ALL-IDB | 189 |
| Total | 445 |
Figure 2(a) Basic structures of the GAN model; and (b) the GAN with auxiliary classifier.
Figure 3Workflow of our developed GAN classifier for identifying acute leukemias and normal cases from microscopic blood images.
Figure 4Schematic diagram of our proposed medical IoT-based diagnosis framework for automatic identification of the blood conditions of patients using wireless microscopic imaging of samples and the developed GAN classifier.
Figure 5A confusion matrix and evaluation metrics for the microscopic blood image classification results presented in this study.
Figure 6Confusion matrices for binary classification of ALL disease versus normal cases for all tested deep network models.
Figure 7Confusion matrices for multi-class classification of ALL, AML, and normal blood cells for all tested deep network models.
Evaluation metrics for all tested binary classifiers on microscopic blood images.
| Classification Model | Class | Precision | Recall (Sensitivity) | F1-Score | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGG-16 | ALL | 0.84 |
| 0.91 | 0.9054 |
| Normal |
| 0.82 | 0.90 | ||
| ResNet-50 | ALL | 0.90 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.9324 |
| Normal | 0.97 | 0.89 | 0.93 | ||
| DenseNet-121 | ALL | 0.95 |
| 0.97 | 0.9730 |
| Normal |
| 0.95 | 0.97 | ||
| Developed GAN Classifier | ALL |
|
|
|
|
| Normal |
|
|
|
Evaluation metrics for all tested multi-class classifiers on microscopic blood images.
| Classification Model | Class | Precision | Recall (Sensitivity) | F1-Score | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGG-16 | ALL | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.8430 |
| AML | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.79 | ||
| Normal | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.86 | ||
| ResNet-50 | ALL | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.9101 |
| AML |
| 0.80 | 0.89 | ||
| Normal | 0.90 |
| 0.92 | ||
| DenseNet-121 | ALL | 0.87 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.9213 |
| AML |
|
|
| ||
| Normal | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.93 | ||
| Developed GAN Classifier | ALL |
|
|
|
|
| AML |
|
|
| ||
| Normal |
|
|
|
Comparison between our developed GAN and other models in previous studies for the classification of leukemias.
| Classification Model | Tested Data Set | Classification Task | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNN [ | ALL-IDB and ASH image bank | Binary (ALL vs. normal) | 88.25 |
| Multi-class (acute and chronic leukemia sub-types) | 81.74 | ||
| SVM [ | ASH image bank | Binary (AML vs. normal) | 98.00 |
| VGG-16 [ | ALL-IDB | Binary (ALL vs. normal) | 96.84 |
| DenseNet-121 [ | Private Dataset from Guangdong Second Provincial General | Multi-Class (ALL, AML, CML, and Normal) | 95.30 |
| Hospital, and Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University | |||
| DenseNet-121 with SVM ResNet-50 with SVM [ | Mixed data set including ALL-IDB | Binary (ALL vs. Normal) | 98.00 |
| images | Multi-class (ALL, AML, and Normal) |
| |
| Developed GAN Classifier | ALL-IDB and ASH image bank | Binary (ALL vs. Normal) |
|
| Multi-class (ALL, AML, and Normal) | 95.58 |