| Literature DB >> 35335124 |
Lukáš Fojt1, Bohumír Grüner2, Jan Nekvinda2, Ece Zeynep Tűzűn2, Luděk Havran1, Miroslav Fojta1.
Abstract
In this study we explore the effect on the electrochemical signals in aqueous buffers of the presence of hydrophilic alkylhydroxy and carboxy groups on the carbon atoms of cobalta bis(dicarbollide) ions. The oxygen-containing exo-skeletal substituents of cobalta bis(dicarbollide) ions belong to the perspective building blocks that are considered for bioconjugation. Carbon substitution provides wider versatility and applicability in terms of the flexibility of possible chemical pathways. However, until recently, the electrochemistry of compounds substituted only on boron atoms could be studied, due to the unavailability of carbon-substituted congeners. In the present study, electrochemistry in aqueous phosphate buffers is considered along with the dependence of electrochemical response on pH and concentration. The compounds used show electrochemical signals around -1.3 and +1.1 V of similar or slightly higher intensities than in the parent cobalta bis(dicarbollide) ion. The signals at positive electrochemical potential correspond to irreversible oxidation of the boron cage (the C2B9 building block) and at negative potential correspond to the reversible redox process of (CoIII/CoII) at the central atom. Although the first signal is typically sharp and its potential can be altered by a number of substituents, the second signal is complex and is composed of three overlapping peaks. This signal shows sigmoidal character at higher concentrations and may be used as a diagnostic tool for aggregation in solution. Surprisingly enough, the observed effects of the site of substitution (boron or carbon) and between individual groups on the electrochemical response were insignificant. Therefore, the substitutions would preserve promising properties of the parent cage for redox labelling, but would not allow for the further tuning of signal position in the electrochemical window.Entities:
Keywords: cobalta bis(dicarbollide) ions; differential pulse voltammetry; glassy carbon electrode; metallacarborane
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35335124 PMCID: PMC8953506 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27061761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Peak positions and heights with simple characteristics of used BCCs on GCE, pH = 8, concentration of all metallaborates 500 μM. For the BCCs marked * the highest achievable concentration of 500 μM was used in the electrolyte solution.
| BCC Charge | Label in the Text | MW | Peak Position/V | Peak Height/μA·cm−2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1- |
| 323.74 | −1.30; 1.14; 1.29; 1.45; | 121.0; 55.5; 217.0; 160.0; | |
| [(1-HOC2H5-1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)-3,3′-Co)]Cs | 1- |
| 367.79 | −1.24; 1.16; 1.47; | 8.7;191.2; 65.7; |
| [(1-HOC3H7-1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)-3,3′-Co)] Me3NH | 1- |
| 382.83 | −1.26; 1.17; 1.30; 1.58; | 50.6; 75.9; 114.1; 30.2; |
| [1,1′-(HOCH21,2-C2B9H10)2-3,3′-Co)] Me3NH | 1- |
| 377.73 | −1.13; 1.16; 1.38; 1.44; | 31.7; 297.9; 209.7; 228.6; |
| [1,1′-(HOC2H5-1,2-C2B9H10)2-3,3′-Co)] Me3NH | 1- |
| 411.74 | −1.15; 1.17; 1.26; 1.49; | 57.0; 231.8; 375.6; 160.7; |
| [(1-HOOC-1,2-C2B9H10)(1′,2′-C2B9H11)-3,3′-Co)] Me4N | 1- |
| 367.75 | −1.31; 1.16;1.32; | 44.5; 192.5; 355.6; |
| [1,1′-(HOOC)2-(1,2-C2B9H10)2-3,3′-Co)] Me4N | 1- |
| 411.76 | −1.21; 1.17; 1.32; | 51.1; 339.0; 406.5; |
| [8,8′-(CH3O)2-(1,2-C2B9H10)2-3,3′-Co)] Me4N * [ | 1- |
| 377.73 | −1.30; 1.15; 1.32; 1.45; 1.68; | 94.3; 410.0; 371.0; 377.0; 14.1; |
Figure 1Schematic structural formulas of the metallacarboranes and all used exo-skeletal substituents. For all cases, black ball—CH group; green ball—BH group.
Figure 2DPV of all used compounds, PB, pH = 8, 500 μM concentrations of all samples, GCE. See caption in the panel for sample identification.
Figure 3Cyclic voltammogram of HOOC-CoSAN (A) and (HOOC)2-CoSAN (B) in PB, 1000 μM concentration, GCE, pH = 8, scan rate ν = 100 mV·s−1.
Figure 4pH dependencies of 200 μM HOOC-CoSAN (A) and (HOOC)2-CoSAN (B), GCE. See the captions in the panels for pH value identification.
Figure 5Concentration dependencies of HOOC-CoSAN (A) and (HOOC)2-CoSAN (B), at pH 8, GCE. See the captions in the panels for concentration identification.
Figure 6Deconvolution results (peak heights and position of fitted peaks) for the CoSAN, (HOCH2)2-CoSAN and (CH3O)2B-CoSAN [44] (A). Example of measured, sum of fitted peaks and individual fitted peaks for (HOCH2)2-CoSAN (B). All fitted curves were measured in PB of pH = 8, 500 μM concentration.