| Literature DB >> 35334729 |
Pengcheng Cai1,2, Xingyin Xiong1, Kunfeng Wang1,2, Liangbo Ma1,2, Zheng Wang3, Yunfei Liu1,2, Xudong Zou1,2.
Abstract
Mode-localized sensing paradigms applied to accelerometers have recently become popular research subjects. However, the output of mode-localized accelerometers is influenced by environment temperature due to the difference in the thermal properties of the coupling resonators and the temperature dependence of coupling stiffness. To improve the performance of mode-localized accelerometers against temperature, we proposed an in situ self-temperature compensation method by utilizing the resonant frequency besides of amplitude ratios, which can be implied online. Experimental results showed that there were nearly 79-times and 87-times improvement in zeros bias and scale factor, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: 2-DoF; compensation; mode-localized accelerometer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35334729 PMCID: PMC8948656 DOI: 10.3390/mi13030437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Mass–spring–damper model of a 2-DoF WCRs with external perturbation.
Figure 2The schematic of the mode localized accelerometer.
Parameters of the accelerometer.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Device thickness | 40 μm |
| Length of CC resonant beam | 400 μm |
| Width of CC resonant beam | 7 μm |
| Gap of resonant beam | 2 μm |
| Quality of proof mass | 1.50 mg |
| Quality factor | 15,600 |
| Glass thickness | 50 μm |
Figure 3(a) Mode shape, amplitude ratios and linearity-enhanced output metric of the first mode. (b) Mode shape, amplitude ratios and linearity-enhanced output metric of the second mode.
Figure 4FEM simulation for the relationship between amplitude and resonant frequency under different temperature.
Figure 5Data flow of the compensation process.
Figure 6Photograph of mode-localized accelerometer.
Figure 7Data flow of the compensation process.
Figure 8(a) Comparation on bias drifts of acceleration before and after compensation. (b) Comparation on errors of scale factor before and after compensation.
Comparison with work [27].
| This Work | [ | |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature range | 300 K–360 K | 303 K–333 K |
| Bias drift | 0.088 mg/K | 0.22 mg/K |
| Scale factor over the temperature range | 0.45% | 0.94% |