| Literature DB >> 35334687 |
Sai Wang1,2, Linping Lu1,2, Kunpeng Zhang1,2, Shuying Hao1,2, Qichang Zhang3, Jingjing Feng1,2.
Abstract
In this paper, we use the nonlinear hardening stiffness of drive mode deal with the contradiction between gain and bandwidth of the linear micro-gyroscope, to improve the bandwidth and gain in sense direction. Firstly, in order to adjust the distance between two resonant peaks, we changed an incomplete two-degree-of-freedom(2-DoF) sense mode system of the micro-gyroscope into a complete 2-DoF system. Afterward, according to the given nonlinear coefficient of stiffness of drive mode, the structure size of driving micro-beams was designed to obtain a nonlinear micro-gyroscope with controllable stiffness. Finally, we investigated the effects of peaks spacing, damping, and driving nonlinearity on gain and bandwidth, and the nonlinear micro-gyroscope was optimized by orthogonal experiment method and response surface method. The results reveal that the peaks spacing has a great influence on the gain and bandwidth of both linear and nonlinear micro-gyroscopes. The larger the peaks spacing, the lower the gain, but higher gain can be achieved when the resonant frequency of the drive mode is close to the lower-order resonant frequency of the sense mode. Driving nonlinearity leads to the response peak of the Coriolis force to have a hardening characteristic, thus forming a wide platform in the sense direction. Hardening of the response peak of the Coriolis force allows the micro-gyroscope to obtain a higher gain while the bandwidth of the sense mode is also greatly improved. In addition, parameter optimization can make the gain and bandwidth of the micro-gyroscope optimal. When the peaks spacing is small and the nonlinear stiffness coefficient is about 1012.2, under the premise that the gain is basically constant, the bandwidth of the sense mode increases about 1.76 times compared with the linear gyroscope. Damping can suppress the influence of nonlinearity in a micro-gyroscope system. Within a certain range, the frequency response of the nonlinear micro-gyroscope tends to be a linear system with the increase in damping, resulting in narrower bandwidth and lower gain.Entities:
Keywords: bandwidth; complete 2-DOF sense mode; dynamical characteristics; gain; nonlinear micro-gyroscope
Year: 2022 PMID: 35334687 PMCID: PMC8952791 DOI: 10.3390/mi13030393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Fully decoupled 3-DoF micro-gyroscope: (a) Incomplete 2-DoF sense mode system; (b) Complete 2-DoF sense mode system; (c) Physical schematic diagram of the micro-gyroscope.
Figure 2Relationship of gain G2 and parameter .
The parameters of the micro-gyroscope.
| Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| Thickness of structural layer ( | 80 µm |
| Mass of the drive frame ( | 2.85 × 10−7 Kg |
| Mass of the decoupling frame ( | 2.6 × 10−7 Kg |
| Mass of the sense frame ( | 2 × 10−7 Kg |
| Mass of the sense-II ( | 1.2 × 10−7 Kg |
| 270 | |
| 500 | |
| 40 × 10−6 µm | |
| 16 × 10−6 µm | |
| 10 × 10−6 µm | |
| 4 × 10−6 µm | |
| 0.26 | |
| 0.97 | |
| 5.34 × 10−6 N | |
| 4.5 × 10−5 N·s/m | |
| 3.4 × 10−5 N·s/m | |
| 1.8 × 10−5 N·s/m |
Figure 3Frequency response of the drive mode and sense mode.
Figure 4Linear case: the resonant frequency of the drive mode close to the low-order resonant frequency of the sense mode: (a) ; (b) ; (c) .
Figure 5Comparison of Runge—Kutta methods and multiple time scales method: (a) drive mode; (b) sense mode.
Figure 6Nonlinear case: the resonant frequency of the drive mode close to the low-order resonant frequency of the sense mode: (a) ; (b) ; (c) .
Effect of peaks spacing on gain and bandwidth.
| Peaks Pacing | Sense Bandwidth | Sense Gain | Drive Gain | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 560 | Linear | 115 | −181.6 | −137 |
| Nonlinear | 115 | −181.6 | −137 | |
| 280 | Linear | 45 | −163.1 | −128.2 |
| Nonlinear | 58 | −163.7 | −128 | |
| 230 | Linear | 42 | −156.1 | −126.6 |
| Nonlinear | 116 | −157.3 | −127.2 | |
Data analysis of gain and bandwidth.
| Number | X1 | Δf | Bandwidth | Gain | Number | X1 | Δf | Bandwidth | Gain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 275 | 70 | 62 | −162.9 | 10 | 280 | 100 | 113 | −157.5 |
| 2 | 275 | 80 | 76 | −160.7 | 11 | 280 | 110 | 80 | −156.1 |
| 3 | 275 | 90 | 111 | −158.5 | 12 | 280 | 120 | 69 | −154.8 |
| 4 | 275 | 100 | 108 | −156.5 | 13 | 285 | 70 | 60 | −164.0 |
| 5 | 275 | 110 | 81 | −155.5 | 14 | 285 | 80 | 64 | −162.1 |
| 6 | 275 | 120 | 63 | −154.6 | 15 | 285 | 90 | 108 | −159.8 |
| 7 | 280 | 70 | 65 | −163.2 | 16 | 285 | 100 | 115 | −157.5 |
| 8 | 280 | 80 | 82 | −161.3 | 17 | 285 | 110 | 89 | −156.3 |
| 9 | 280 | 90 | 109 | −159.1 | 18 | 285 | 120 | 70 | −155.2 |
Figure 7Optimization of bandwidth and gain: (a); (b).
Figure 8Comparison of the different nonlinear coefficients k: (a) drive mode; (b) sense mode.
Effect of the nonlinear coeffients k on gain and bandwidth.
|
| Sense Bandwidth (Hz) | Sense Gain (dB) | Drive Gain (dB) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear | 42 | −156.1 | −126.6 |
| 1012 | 96 | −157 | −127 |
| 1012.2 | 116 | −157.3 | −127.2 |
| 1012.4 | 154 | −157.5 | −127.4 |
| 1012.5 | 179 | −157.8 | −127.5 |
Figure 9.
Figure 10(a) ; (b) .
Figure 11Influence of damping on the linear micro-gyroscope: (a) drive mode; (b) sense mode.
Figure 12Influence of damping on the nonlinear micro-gyroscope: (a) drive mode; (b) sense mode.
Influence of damping on the bandwidth and gain of the drive and sense mode.
| Pressure (Pa) | Sense Bandwidth (Hz) | Sense Gain (dB) | Drive Gain (dB) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Linear | 42 | −156.1 | −126.6 |
| Nonlinear | 116 | −157.3 | −127.2 | |
| 15 | Linear | 45 | −158.8 | −126 |
| Nonlinear | 81 | −160.6 | −124.3 | |
| 20 | Linear | 50 | −160.2 | −124.9 |
| Nonlinear | 67 | −162.4 | −123.8 | |