| Literature DB >> 35334521 |
Shang-Ting Tsai1, Hung-Yu Lin2, Chia-Ying Li3,4, Chih-Chien Lin1.
Abstract
Background andEntities:
Keywords: fixation stability; flail chest; pre-contoured rib plate; rib fracture
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35334521 PMCID: PMC8955880 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58030345
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.430
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the configuration of the APS Rib Fixation System and its implantation in the scenario of repairing a rib fracture. (A) Sagittal view of APS plates shows a “pre-contoured” shape to fit an average rib shape, minimizing the need for intraoperative bending. R = radius. (B) The APS screw. (C,D) The procedure of implanting an APS plate on a bone injury. (E) The cross-sectional view of a screw-locked 1.5 mm thick APS plate.
Figure 2Schematic illustration of the configuration of a Mini bone plate and its implantation in the scenario of repairing a rib fracture. (A) General configuration of a Mini plate. (B) The Mini screw. (C,D) The Mini bone plate requires manual bending prior to implantation to a bone injury. (D) Screwing of the Mini plate. (E) The cross-sectional view of a screw-locked 1.2 mm thick Mini plate.
Figure 3A representative case of multiple rib fractures repaired with APS plates. (A,B) AP radiograph of pre-operation (Pre-OP) and post-operation (Post-OP). (C) Three-dimensional CT reconstruction image of the injury. (D) Intraoperative photograph showing the rib-repairing technique with implanted APS plates.
Figure 4Comparison of fixation stability between the APS and Mini plates. The occurrences of (A) plate fracture, (B) screw dislocation, and (C) fracture plus dislocation. OR, odds ratio.