Xiao-Xiao Zhang1, Naoto Nagaosa1,2. 1. RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science (CEMS), Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan. 2. Department of Applied Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Abstract
Weyl semimetals are emerging to become a new class of quantum-material platform for various novel phenomena. Especially, the Weyl orbit made from surface Fermi arcs and bulk relativistic states is expected to play a key role in magnetotransport, leading even to a three-dimensional quantum Hall effect (QHE). It is experimentally and theoretically important although yet unclear whether it bears essentially the same phenomenon as the conventional two-dimensional QHE. We discover an unconventional fully three-dimensional anisotropy in the quantum transport under a magnetic field. Strong suppression and even disappearance of the QHE occur when the Hall-bar current is rotated away from being transverse to parallel with respect to the Weyl point alignment, which is attributed to a peculiar absence of conventional bulk-boundary correspondence. Besides, transport along the magnetic field can exhibit a remarkable reversal from negative to positive magnetoresistance. These results establish the uniqueness of this QHE system as a novel three-dimensional quantum matter.
Weyl semimetals are emerging to become a new class of quantum-material platform for various novel phenomena. Especially, the Weyl orbit made from surface Fermi arcs and bulk relativistic states is expected to play a key role in magnetotransport, leading even to a three-dimensional quantum Hall effect (QHE). It is experimentally and theoretically important although yet unclear whether it bears essentially the same phenomenon as the conventional two-dimensional QHE. We discover an unconventional fully three-dimensional anisotropy in the quantum transport under a magnetic field. Strong suppression and even disappearance of the QHE occur when the Hall-bar current is rotated away from being transverse to parallel with respect to the Weyl point alignment, which is attributed to a peculiar absence of conventional bulk-boundary correspondence. Besides, transport along the magnetic field can exhibit a remarkable reversal from negative to positive magnetoresistance. These results establish the uniqueness of this QHE system as a novel three-dimensional quantum matter.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D anisotropy; Weyl semimetal, 3D quantum Hall effect; magnetotransport; surface state
Continuous
interest has been sparked by the prediction and experimental
realization of three-dimensional (3D) linear band crossings in Weyl
semimetal (WSM) systems as a highly nontrivial extension of the two-dimensional
(2D) Dirac physics.[1−9] A WSM possesses various intriguing features such as (i) a topologically
protected momentum-space monopole structure, (ii) open-arc surface
states, (iii) bulk chiral Landau level (LL) formation, (iv) an anomalous
Hall effect (AHE), and (v) a chiral magnetic effect and negative magnetoresistance.[10−24] In this new quantum material, the unique 3D closed semiclassical
Weyl orbit under magnetic field has been proposed: it consists of
a combination of the top and bottom surface Fermi arcs and the bulk
chiral LLs, where the latter leads to a real-space vertical trajectory
connecting the projection points of a Weyl point (WP) on the orange
surfaces in Figure a.[25−27] Apart from its detection from quantum phase oscillations,
researchers have also envisaged a 3D quantum Hall effect (QHE) based
on such an orbit in mesoscopic WSMs.[28] Previous
studies have focused on the dependence of magnetic field direction
and clarified other possible mechanisms;[29−31] experimental investigation in
related materials has also found encouraging evidence of the Weyl
orbit.[27,32−37]
Figure 1
(a)
3D bulk WSM system under a magnetic field. The orange top and
bottom surfaces at y = ±L/2 are always connected by the green side
surfaces at x = ±L/2 due to the topological arc circulating states.
The red arc LL edge states lead to the robust QHE. To illustrate the
Weyl orbit, we use a mixed representation: on the top and bottom surfaces
we indicate in k-space the Fermi arcs connecting two
WPs along k; the brown
dot-dashed lines along the real y-axis indicate the
bulk chiral LLs. Note that such chiral LLs exist everywhere in the r-space. (b) Six-terminal Hall-bar system under magnetic field B = Bŷ. Leads 1, 2, 3, and 4 measure
the voltage while a current flows through leads 5 and 6. The two-terminal
case has leads 5 and 6 only. The axes exemplify the zx-geometry with the QHE signal.
(a)
3D bulk WSM system under a magnetic field. The orange top and
bottom surfaces at y = ±L/2 are always connected by the green side
surfaces at x = ±L/2 due to the topological arc circulating states.
The red arc LL edge states lead to the robust QHE. To illustrate the
Weyl orbit, we use a mixed representation: on the top and bottom surfaces
we indicate in k-space the Fermi arcs connecting two
WPs along k; the brown
dot-dashed lines along the real y-axis indicate the
bulk chiral LLs. Note that such chiral LLs exist everywhere in the r-space. (b) Six-terminal Hall-bar system under magnetic field B = Bŷ. Leads 1, 2, 3, and 4 measure
the voltage while a current flows through leads 5 and 6. The two-terminal
case has leads 5 and 6 only. The axes exemplify the zx-geometry with the QHE signal.Since the QHE is essentially a 2D phenomenon, it is an intriguing
question whether the nature of this new QHE remains the same as in
two dimensions.[38−40] Surprisingly, dissimilar to what one would expect
for a QHE-like phenomenon, there hides essential and intrinsic anisotropy
in the magnetotransport, which can in general affect and even diminish
the QHE. The clear QHE features when current flows transversely to
the momentum-space WP alignment will be strongly suppressed as one
deviates from this probing geometry. In the orthogonal setting with
current parallel to the WP alignment, the system does not show a QHE
and is the most susceptible to disorder. The origin can be traced
back to an unexpected absence of bulk-boundary correspondence (BBC),
and all three directions play different roles: arc surface states
from the quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAHE) edge states are defined
on momentum slices only between the WPs, and the role of green side
surfaces is distinct from the front and back surfaces in Figure a. Besides revealing
the fundamental difference between the conventional QHE and this 3D
WSM QHE, transport along the applied magnetic field shows a remarkable
reversal of the well-known negative magnetoresistance due to chiral
anomaly, which is attributed to a nontrivial competition between surface
and bulk contributions. To summarize, there are three directions,
i.e., those of the applied magnetic field, the alignment of WPs, and
that perpendicular to the previous two; the system exhibits an overlooked
but essential anisotropy with respect to the transport direction relative
to these three (Table ).
Table 1
Summary of the Magnetotransport along
Three Orthogonal Directionsa
B = Bŷ
current
direction i
x (QHE)**
y*
z
major contribution
diagonal edge states
from arc LLs
arc channels + bulk chiral LLs
surface hybridized states
two-terminal conductance
Gxx = n
Gyy(W−)
Gzz(W−)
six-terminal resistance
Rxx = 0
Ryy(B∓) ≪ 1
Rzz(W+) ≠ 0
R̃yy ≈ Gyy–1
Current directions i = x, y, z in
the WSM with WPs along the k-axis. Number of * indicates the stability against disorder: i = y exhibits a moderate stability weaker
than the QHE when i = x but stronger
than the vulnerable i = z case.
Major transport contributing channels are listed. n for quantized integer in the QHE. G(W=0) is quantized
to the number of contributing channels not related to the QHE. Besides
Hall and longitudinal resistances R, one has another resistance R̃ between two current leads in the six-terminal
measurement. W+ (W−) means
increasing (decreasing) as the disorder strength W increases. Small R originates from the separation in both k- and r-space of the counterpropagating conducting channels. B∓ signifies the reversal from negative to positive
magnetoresistance.
Current directions i = x, y, z in
the WSM with WPs along the k-axis. Number of * indicates the stability against disorder: i = y exhibits a moderate stability weaker
than the QHE when i = x but stronger
than the vulnerable i = z case.
Major transport contributing channels are listed. n for quantized integer in the QHE. G(W=0) is quantized
to the number of contributing channels not related to the QHE. Besides
Hall and longitudinal resistances R, one has another resistance R̃ between two current leads in the six-terminal
measurement. W+ (W−) means
increasing (decreasing) as the disorder strength W increases. Small R originates from the separation in both k- and r-space of the counterpropagating conducting channels. B∓ signifies the reversal from negative to positive
magnetoresistance.
Results
We consider the following minimal two-band model with two WPs (0,
0, ±kw) located on the k-axis and the Fermi energy εF = 2D(1 –
cos kw) at the WPswhere we include
mutually unequal D for realistic anisotropy giving
rise to curved Fermi arcs
and a nonvanishing response in every direction. As illustrated in Figure b, we use two-terminal
and six-terminal Hall-bar probing geometries, where WSM current leads
cover two surfaces and metallic voltage leads have limited size.[41,42] Unless otherwise stated, we apply a magnetic field B = Bŷ via the Peierls substitution k → k + eA and average over an onsite disorder uniformly distributed in [−W/2, W/2]. For a current flowing along
the i-axis, apart from the two-terminal conductance G, the six-terminal Hall bar
measures either the Hall (j ≠ i) or longitudinal (j = i) resistance R. Another R̃ between leads 5 and 6 would give the
identical Hall resistance R if the BBC in the conventional QHE was preserved, i.e., contributed
by the quantized contact resistance from edge states as G. To calculate the transmission probability
in the Landauer–Büttiker formula, we adopt the wave
function scattering matrix approach equivalent to the nonequilibrium
Green function.[43−45]
Suppression of the QHE in an Orthogonal Geometry
In Figure , we
show the conductance
and resistance for two orthogonal probing geometries. While the zx-geometry (current along x and voltage
leads extend along z) exhibits clear and consistent
QHE features robust against disorder,[28,29] the xz-geometry sees entirely distinct behavior. (i) The quantized
plateaus disappear in any of G, R̃,
and R except for G without disorder. (ii) The
vanishing longitudinal resistance R becomes finite and overall increases with disorder strength
in a conventional manner. (iii) The stability against disorder in
each signal largely reduces to a minimal level. This indicates that
the conducting channels contributing to the transport along two orthogonal
directions bear some fundamental difference. Note that this does not
contradict the Onsager reciprocity discussed in the Supporting Information
(SI Section I).
Figure 2
Hall and longitudinal
transport responses, including the two-terminal
conductance G and six-terminal
resistances for two orthogonal probing geometries, i.e., current flowing
along (a) i = x and (b) i = z. R,R are the longitudinal and
Hall resistances; R̃ is the resistance between current leads. Colors denote the
disorder strength W. System size L = L = 37, L = 28.
Parameters throughout this paper are A = 1, M = 0.15, D = 0.06, D = 0.03, D = 0.09, and k = π/2, and we set e2/h = 1.
Hall and longitudinal
transport responses, including the two-terminal
conductance G and six-terminal
resistances for two orthogonal probing geometries, i.e., current flowing
along (a) i = x and (b) i = z. R,R are the longitudinal and
Hall resistances; R̃ is the resistance between current leads. Colors denote the
disorder strength W. System size L = L = 37, L = 28.
Parameters throughout this paper are A = 1, M = 0.15, D = 0.06, D = 0.03, D = 0.09, and k = π/2, and we set e2/h = 1.In fact, without disorder one can visualize the conducting channels
thanks to the conserved momentum along the respective current direction. Figure shows the relevant
band structure and the corresponding representative cross-sectional
wave function probability distribution. In Figure a, the projection of both WPs coincide at k = 0. The formation of LLs
in a range across εF signifies their origin from
the surface Fermi arcs, since the bulk density of states vanishes
at εF. Then the upward-bending edge of these LLs
exactly serves as the red diagonal QHE edge states in Figure a under protection from backscattering,
which is also readily seen in Figure d. In Figure b, two WPs at k = ±π/2 remain separated and are connected by the arc
states discretized by finite L. Figure e1 with large kF exhibits
counterpropagating D-shaped wave functions connecting the top and
bottom via the side surface and the bulk, whose semiclassical trajectory
has previously been noticed.[29] In Figure e2 with small kF, the top and bottom surfaces and two side
surfaces are almost fully connected. In fact, as one plots the conducting
wave functions with decreasing kF, Figure e1 gradually deforms
into Figure e2. Most
importantly, there is no LL formation along k, which dictates the disappearance of the
QHE together with related features. Large system sizes can at most
give few fragile quasiplateaus well below the accuracy and robustness
of the QHE (SI Section II). It partially
results from the conventional mesoscopic channel quantization as G(W=0) and
may grow in large samples due to denser discretization. The results
are summarized in Table . See also SI Section I for the complete
resistance tensor. Transport along the magnetic field direction ŷ in relation to Figure c,f will be described later.
Figure 3
(a–c) Low-energy
bands under a magnetic field with (a) periodic x-axis
and L = L = 60, B = 0.025, (b)
periodic z-axis and L = L = 90, B = 0.025, (c) periodic y-axis and L = L = 30, B =
0.1. The main features are stable against large enough
system sizes. The Fermi energy εF = 0.18 is indicated
by the dashed line. Color scales indicate the real-space position
expectation value ⟨y⟩, ⟨z⟩, ⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩, ⟨x⟩, and ⟨z⟩, respectively for (a1), (a2), (b1), (b2), (c1),
and (c2) of the corresponding wave function. Note that ⟨y⟩ and ⟨z⟩ are mostly
close to zero in (b2) and (c2). (d–f) Wave function probability
distribution in three cross sections (d) yz, (e) yx, and (f) zx, respectively, corresponding
to (a), (b), and (c). For (d), wave functions from two representative
bands crossing the Fermi level in (a), typically with (d1) largest
or (d2) smallest kF along k as indicated by black dots in (a2),
are shown; within (d1), for instance, (d1±) shows the state at
positive/negative k =
±kF of that particular band. (e,
f), labeled and sorted in the similar manner, are from the black dots
in (b2) and (c2).
(a–c) Low-energy
bands under a magnetic field with (a) periodic x-axis
and L = L = 60, B = 0.025, (b)
periodic z-axis and L = L = 90, B = 0.025, (c) periodic y-axis and L = L = 30, B =
0.1. The main features are stable against large enough
system sizes. The Fermi energy εF = 0.18 is indicated
by the dashed line. Color scales indicate the real-space position
expectation value ⟨y⟩, ⟨z⟩, ⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩, ⟨x⟩, and ⟨z⟩, respectively for (a1), (a2), (b1), (b2), (c1),
and (c2) of the corresponding wave function. Note that ⟨y⟩ and ⟨z⟩ are mostly
close to zero in (b2) and (c2). (d–f) Wave function probability
distribution in three cross sections (d) yz, (e) yx, and (f) zx, respectively, corresponding
to (a), (b), and (c). For (d), wave functions from two representative
bands crossing the Fermi level in (a), typically with (d1) largest
or (d2) smallest kF along k as indicated by black dots in (a2),
are shown; within (d1), for instance, (d1±) shows the state at
positive/negative k =
±kF of that particular band. (e,
f), labeled and sorted in the similar manner, are from the black dots
in (b2) and (c2).Surface theory can help
gain further insights.[28,46−48] For the top
and bottom y = ±L/2 surfaces around k = 0, we obtain the effective
Hamiltonian (SI Section III)for k between WPs, where ε0 =
2D – 2D cos kw, v′ = , and D′ = D – D, D′ = D – D. The top and bottom Fermi
arcs are
respectively in the k > 0 and k <
0 regions
due to positive D′. Considering transport
along the x-axis, gauge choice A = Bzx̂ and conserved k is able to form LLs from essentially the same quasi-1D z-axis cosine gas. Semiclassically, LL states originate
from electrons traversing the Weyl orbit previously described with Figure a, which consists
of arc trajectories connected by bulk chiral LLs. The metallic ±L/2 green side surfaces in Figure a, which host QAHE
circulating states and disperses along y,z-directions, are merged in the current leads. In fact,
around the ±L/2
surface, arc LL bands bent upward in Figure a near the ∓L/2 edge will just become the ±x̂-propagating red diagonal edge channel in Figure a, because of the
correspondence between k and the guiding center along the z-axis. Figure parts d1 and d2
clearly show such diagonal edge states in the yz-plane.
This means that the h± contributions
to edge LL formation are largely separated in both k and real z and do
not directly interfere.However, for transport along the z-axis with gauge
choice A = −Bxẑ and conserved k, the
top and bottom quasi-1D x-axis gases are not “decoupled”
in the previous simple manner. Required by the measurement geometry,
the nontrivial green side surfaces in Figure a are always present and host similar states
as eq ; their highly
nonlocal QAHE circulating states naturally extend into the top and
bottom surfaces and play in part the role of connecting states from h± under a magnetic field. Therefore, a
magnetic arc state at εF lives on both top and bottom surfaces and exhibits ⟨y⟩
∼ 0 in Figure b2 and possesses a much weaker ⟨x⟩-asymmetry
in Figure b1 than
in Figure a2. These
are readily visualized within the yx-plane in Figure e as previously noted.
Indicated by these results, the circulating or top-bottom inseparable
nature forces hybridization with the bulk and especially metallic
side surfaces and generates dispersiveness in Figure b; there is thus no flat bulk gap essential
to the QHE but hybridized states that allow for scattering. Note that
the metallicity of the side surface, e.g., its z-axis
dispersion, is indispensable to the 3D QHE as it generates the curved
Fermi arcs. Fundamentally, such contrasting behavior between two geometries
is the consequence of the WSM topology choosing a direction: WPs are
aligned along the k-axis.
Phenomena possibly related to this have been noticed in the second-harmonic
generation and arc optical conductivity.[49,50]
Rotating the System with Respect to the y-Axis
In realistic WSM experiments, alignment of WPs as generic band
crossings could easily be oblique to the natural crystallographic
growth geometry and also the Hall bar, e.g., due to hoppings beyond
the nearest neighbor. To address this, we consider a rotation with
respect to ŷ of the Hall-bar system by a commensurate
angle θ = arctan(m, m): the new supercell
includes m cells along
the i-axis for i = x, z (see SI Figure S4). Accordingly, we rotate the gauge A(θ) together
(SI Section IV), denote the rotated x, z-axes as X, Z, and keep the current flowing along X. When θ = 0, π/2, it reproduces the foregoing zx- or xz-geometry. As shown in Figure and additional cases
in SI Section II, the transport responses
exhibit a significant anisotropy. (i) Higher QHE plateaus start to
disappear as θ increases from 0. (ii) Beyond π/4, basically
no plateaus can survive. (iii) The remaining plateaus and longitudinal
resistances are much more susceptible to the same level of disorder
than the zx-geometry in Figure a. Even in Figure b the first plateau with disorder actually
suffers a huge 2% deviation from perfect quantization, compared with
10–13 accuracy in Figure a. Note also that in the conventional QHE,
e.g., a square-lattice electron gas, none of these features are present
and the plateaus are always robust against such rotation although
the system itself only possesses a C4 rotation
symmetry (SI Section II).
Figure 4
Hall and longitudinal
resistances R̃, R, and R for
the six-terminal measurement. The current direction i = X (together with the orthogonal j = Z direction) of the Hall bar is rotated with
respect to ŷ from the original x-axis by a commensurate angle θ. System size L = 24 and L use the corresponding commensurate
length closest to 38 in three rotation angles (a, b, c) in ascending
order. Colors denote the disorder strength W.
Hall and longitudinal
resistances R̃, R, and R for
the six-terminal measurement. The current direction i = X (together with the orthogonal j = Z direction) of the Hall bar is rotated with
respect to ŷ from the original x-axis by a commensurate angle θ. System size L = 24 and L use the corresponding commensurate
length closest to 38 in three rotation angles (a, b, c) in ascending
order. Colors denote the disorder strength W.This anisotropy or strong θ-dependence displays
a crossover
behavior between the two previous cases. With an oblique θ >
0, transport along X is no longer contributed solely
by the well-defined arc LL edge states; instead, there always exists
a finite projection in the z-direction transport,
which is based on the foregoing surface hybridized states without
LL formation. As θ increases, the z-axis backscattering
affects more and more the X-axis current, which does
not play a role when θ = 0. Therefore, the QHE will deteriorate
to some extent with any finite θ because the formation and robustness
of plateaus and the vanishing longitudinal resistance indispensably
rely on an exclusive LL edge-state transport.
Absence of Conventional
Bulk-Boundary Correspondence
An important aspect of the conventional
QHE consists in the BBC,
where the number of conducting edge channels can be uniquely determined
by the bulk topological Chern number.[51,52] Combining
the foregoing physical picture and concrete transport responses, we
conclude that the QHE in a 3D WSM does not possess an usual BBC. First,
a direct consequence of BBC in the conventional QHE is the aforementioned
identity R̃ = R when directions i, j with i ≠ j are perpendicular to magnetic field, which is violated
as long as i ≠ x or θ
≠ 0 as shown in Figures and 4. Second, the QHE hereof largely
relies on the presence of surface arc states under magnetic field,
where εF pinpointed at the WP crosses arc LLs only
in Figure a and bulk
states participate in a supporting way. This renders it physically
infeasible to define a bulk topological invariant.
Importantly, the present phenomenon is distinct from the earlier 3D
QHE scheme characterized by Chern numbers defined for three orthogonal
planes, which is purely a bulk magnetic band property caused by the
charge-density-wave gap etc.[54−59] Third, to reassure this viewpoint, one can actually calculate the
conductivity σ from the lattice
model via the Kubo–Bustin formalism with the kernel polynomial
method, where operator evaluation is restricted deep inside the bulk.[60−62] While it fails to display the present QHE, the same
calculation well shows both the conventional QHE in a 2D electron
gas and the expected AHE σ proportional
to |2kw| in this WSM system (SI Section V). This is simply because the latter
two cases bear the topological BBC.
Transport Parallel to the
Magnetic Field
The remaining y-axis magnetotransport
also has notable features. This
configuration is relevant to the negative magnetoresistance due to
chiral anomaly in a WSM, where chiral pumping via bulk chiral LLs
between WPs is at work.[10−12] As shown in Figure , G, R̃ consistently remain nearly constant until a large field destroys
the contributing QAHE accumulated between WPs. Before that, the robustness
against disorder is intermediate between the previous two orthogonal zx- and xz-geometries; relatedly, the longitudinal R ≪ 1 but is not vanishing
and R̃ approximately
follows G–1, as indicated in Table . This intermediate
stability results from a combination of k- and r-space separation unique to this transport direction. The
relevant conducting channels along the y-axis include
two parts in Figure c1. (i) Red and blue QAHE edge states near the x = ±L/2 side surfaces
are spatially separated. (ii) Two sets of counterpropagating purple
bulk chiral LLs cross at k = 0 where the projection of two WPs coincides; they are distributed
inside the system bulk and also near the side surface. Figure parts f1 and f2, respectively,
show the probability distribution of these two types of states in
the zx-plane.
Figure 5
Magnetotransport parallel to the magnetic
field along the y-axis. (a1, a2) Conductance G and resistance R̃. (b2) zooms in the low-field region
of the longitudinal
resistance R in (b1)
where the reversal from negative to positive magnetoresistance happens.
System size L = L = 30, L = 100.
Magnetotransport parallel to the magnetic
field along the y-axis. (a1, a2) Conductance G and resistance R̃. (b2) zooms in the low-field region
of the longitudinal
resistance R in (b1)
where the reversal from negative to positive magnetoresistance happens.
System size L = L = 30, L = 100.Intriguingly in Figure b1 and the magnified Figure b2, the negative magnetoresistance is very weak and
holds only up to a medium field strength, as disorder can strongly
suppress and reverse it to positive magnetoresistance. The reversal
point moves to smaller field strength with either larger W or L. Note that this
is entirely absent in the other geometry when B and
current I both are along the z-axis,
i.e., parallel to the WP alignment, where negative magnetoresistance
persists all along (SI Section I). This
robust negative magnetoresistance means that, although the k-space separated bulk chiral LLs are subject to large-momentum-transfer
disorder scattering, the increasing number of these chiral channels
with larger B guarantees it. Physically, the main
difference in Figure b from the B∥I∥ẑ situation is the contribution from the aforementioned
nontrivial green side surfaces in Figure a that host topological states conducting
along the y-axis. These dispersive surface states
can themselves be backscattered and especially to the counterpropagating
chiral LLs also present at the side surfaces, which is made easier
and more frequent by the denser guiding center lattice at larger B: the side-surface contribution is purely positive magnetoresistance.
Remarkably in this competition, eventually the surface backscattering
prevails and dominantly contributes to the longitudinal resistance R. In a 3D bulk sample with L comparable to or even larger
than the mean free path, such a positive magnetoresistance will naturally
be expected to occur and it reveals the crucial but overlooked surface
magnetotransport contribution in a WSM.
Discussion
We
examine the 3D QHE and magnetotransport in WSM systems from
the experimentally most relevant viewpoint of a Hall-bar measurement.
Our findings establish the system as a novel quantum state of matter
of highly nontrivial fully 3D anisotropy and reveal the peculiar surface-bulk-hybrid
nature of magnetotransport with no conventional counterpart, e.g.,
in the ordinary 2D QHE. It is expected to provide immediate and key
insights to the experimental investigation. Although we mainly concern
the case with one single pair of WPs as the physically most clarifying
situation, the general consideration can be readily extended to more
complicated cases with multiple pairs of WPs, regardless of a magnetic
or nonmagnetic WSM (SI Section VI).Among experimental reports of quantized transport in the closely
related Dirac semimetal Cd3As2, a few provide
supportive evidence of the role of Weyl orbit via thickness modulation
and dual-gate modulation between top and bottom surfaces.[27,35,37] In the experiment with a nanobelt
grown by chemical vapor deposition, current along the in-plane [11̅0]
direction flows through the sample with surfaces normal to the magnetic
field in the [112] direction.[35] One can
identify them respectively as x̂ and ŷ directions in our discussion. The Dirac points
along the [001] direction (oblique but inside the yz-plane) lead to pairs of Fermi arcs along the z-axis
on the top and bottom surfaces in a similar manner as in Figure a. The front and
back surfaces can also host surface states propagating along the x-axis but do not affect the red diagonal edge states in Figure a. Hence it is akin
to the zx-geometry with the QHE as discussed. In
the other thin-film experiment using solid-phase epitaxy, the in-plane
current direction is presumed to include the [11̅0] and [111̅]
directions due to the presence of two possible domains.[37] Therefore, this situation corresponds to the
rotated case effectively and is still possible to exhibit lower quasiplateaus
in the mesoscopic transport as we discussed. Indeed, the quantization
bears a much more extended and robust appearance and the longitudinal
resistivity is even closer to zero in the former nanobelt experiment,[35] which is consistent with our study. Further
experiments in especially WSMs under various geometries we proposed
will certainly be helpful to firmly observing the intriguing 3D anisotropic
effects.
Authors: Fang Qin; Shuai Li; Z Z Du; C M Wang; Wenqing Zhang; Dapeng Yu; Hai-Zhou Lu; X C Xie Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Jun Xiong; Satya K Kushwaha; Tian Liang; Jason W Krizan; Max Hirschberger; Wudi Wang; R J Cava; N P Ong Journal: Science Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: S Galeski; T Ehmcke; R Wawrzyńczak; P M Lozano; K Cho; A Sharma; S Das; F Küster; P Sessi; M Brando; R Küchler; A Markou; M König; P Swekis; C Felser; Y Sassa; Q Li; G Gu; M V Zimmermann; O Ivashko; D I Gorbunov; S Zherlitsyn; T Förster; S S P Parkin; J Wosnitza; T Meng; J Gooth Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 14.919