Literature DB >> 35332311

Should mutant TP53 be targeted for cancer therapy?

Andreas Strasser1,2, Gemma L Kelly3,4, Zilu Wang5,6.   

Abstract

Mutations in the TP53 tumour suppressor gene are found in ~50% of human cancers [1-6]. TP53 functions as a transcription factor that directly regulates the expression of ~500 genes, some of them involved in cell cycle arrest/cell senescence, apoptotic cell death or DNA damage repair, i.e. the cellular responses that together prevent tumorigenesis [1-6]. Defects in TP53 function not only cause tumour development but also impair the response of malignant cells to anti-cancer drugs, particularly those that induce DNA damage [1-6]. Most mutations in TP53 in human cancers cause a single amino acid substitution, usually within the DNA binding domain of the TP53 protein. These mutant TP53 proteins are often expressed at high levels in the malignant cells. Three cancer causing attributes have been postulated for mutant TP53 proteins: the inability to activate target genes controlled by wt TP53 (loss-of-function, LOF) that are critical for tumour suppression, dominant negative effects (DNE), i.e. blocking the function of wt TP53 in cells during early stages of transformation when mutant and wt TP53 proteins are co-expressed, and gain-of-function (GOF) effects whereby mutant TP53 impacts diverse cellular pathways by interacting with proteins that are not normally engaged by wt TP53 [1-6]. The GOF effects of mutant TP53 were reported to be essential for the sustained proliferation and survival of malignant cells and it was therefore proposed that agents that can remove mutant TP53 protein would have substantial therapeutic impact [7-9]. In this review article we discuss evidence for and against the value of targeting mutant TP53 protein for cancer therapy.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to ADMC Associazione Differenziamento e Morte Cellulare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35332311      PMCID: PMC9091235          DOI: 10.1038/s41418-022-00962-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Death Differ        ISSN: 1350-9047            Impact factor:   12.067


  132 in total

Review 1.  The Transactivation Domains of the p53 Protein.

Authors:  Nitin Raj; Laura D Attardi
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  p53 efficiently suppresses tumor development in the complete absence of its cell-cycle inhibitory and proapoptotic effectors p21, Puma, and Noxa.

Authors:  Liz J Valente; Daniel H D Gray; Ewa M Michalak; Josefina Pinon-Hofbauer; Alex Egle; Clare L Scott; Ana Janic; Andreas Strasser
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Arsenic Trioxide Rescues Structural p53 Mutations through a Cryptic Allosteric Site.

Authors:  Shuo Chen; Jia-Le Wu; Ying Liang; Yi-Gang Tang; Hua-Xin Song; Li-Li Wu; Yang-Fei Xing; Ni Yan; Yun-Tong Li; Zheng-Yuan Wang; Shu-Jun Xiao; Xin Lu; Sai-Juan Chen; Min Lu
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour.

Authors:  M C Marin; C A Jost; L A Brooks; M S Irwin; J O'Nions; J A Tidy; N James; J M McGregor; C A Harwood; I G Yulug; K H Vousden; M J Allday; B Gusterson; S Ikawa; P W Hinds; T Crook; W G Kaelin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  Heat Shock Proteins Promote Cancer: It's a Protection Racket.

Authors:  Stuart K Calderwood; Jianlin Gong
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 13.807

6.  Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours.

Authors:  L A Donehower; M Harvey; B L Slagle; M J McArthur; C A Montgomery; J S Butel; A Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Modulation of p53, ErbB1, ErbB2, and Raf-1 expression in lung cancer cells by depsipeptide FR901228.

Authors:  Xiaodan Yu; Z Sheng Guo; Monica G Marcu; Len Neckers; Dao M Nguyen; G Aaron Chen; David S Schrump
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-04-03       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Gambogic Acid Induces Cell Apoptosis and Inhibits MAPK Pathway in PTEN-/-/p53-/- Prostate Cancer Cells In Vitro and Ex Vivo.

Authors:  Hong Pan; Li-Yuan Lu; Xue-Qian Wang; Bin-Xue Li; Kathleen Kelly; Hong-Sheng Lin
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 1.978

9.  Gambogic acid mediates apoptosis as a p53 inducer through down-regulation of mdm2 in wild-type p53-expressing cancer cells.

Authors:  Hongyan Gu; Xiaotang Wang; Shuyun Rao; Jia Wang; Jie Zhao; Fang Li Ren; Rong Mu; Yong Yang; Qi Qi; Wei Liu; Na Lu; Hua Ling; Qidong You; Qinglong Guo
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.261

10.  Small molecule CP-31398 induces reactive oxygen species-dependent apoptosis in human multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Yohei Arihara; Kohichi Takada; Yusuke Kamihara; Naotaka Hayasaka; Hajime Nakamura; Kazuyuki Murase; Hiroshi Ikeda; Satoshi Iyama; Tsutomu Sato; Koji Miyanishi; Masayoshi Kobune; Junji Kato
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  Exploring the future of research in the Tp53 field.

Authors:  Arnold J Levine
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 12.067

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.