| Literature DB >> 35331195 |
Yueping Li1, Huiyu Lin2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of slanted bilateral lateral rectus recession (S-BLRc) for the treatment of convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia (CI-IXT) in children and to probe the relationship of the slanted amount and surgical outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Convergence insufficiency (CI); Intermittent exotropia (XT); Near-distance difference (NDD); Slanted recession
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35331195 PMCID: PMC8951717 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02367-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Fig. 1The procedure of slanted recession of LR. a Taken during the surgery, recession 4 mm of the upper pole and recession 6 mm of the lower pole. The slanted amount is 2 mm. b The diagram of slanted recession procedure. O is the opper pole of LR. OA (blue) is the new insertion and a (blue) is the central point of OA in the standard recession procedure. During the procedure in our study, the scleral pass of the upper pole of LR was firstly performed and then the scleral pass of the lower pole. OA’ (red) is the slanted insertion and a’ (red) is the central point of OA’ in the 1 mm slanted recession procedure. OA” (black) is the slanted insertion and a” (black) is the central point of OA” in the 2 mm slanted recession procedure. To keep the original length of LR insertion, the actual width of LR, perpendicular to the direction of the muscle force, is narrowed and the central point of new insertion is shifted upwards a bit
Preoperative and postoperative deviation at near and at distance and NDD in the three groups
| Deviation at Near (△) | Deviation at Distance (△) | NDD(△) | Correction of NDD (△) | Success rate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preop | Postop | Preop | Postop | Preop | Postop | ||||||
Group A (n = 22) | −36.5 ± 2.8 (− 34 ~ − 40) | −3.2 ± 5.4 (− 18 ~ + 4) | 6.28E-18 | − 26.7 ± 2.4 (− 25 ~ − 30) | −1.6 ± 4.3 (− 14 ~ + 4) | 9.10E-17 | 10.0 ± 0.0 (10 ~ 10) | 1.8 ± 1.9 (0 ~ + 6) | 2.78E-15 | 8.2 ± 1.9 (4 ~ 10) | 90.9% (20/22) |
Group B ( | −36.8 ± 4.6 (− 30 ~ − 45) | − 0.9 ± 3.4 (− 10 ~ + 6) | 1.31E-15 | −25.7 ± 3.9 (− 20 ~ − 32) | − 0.1 ± 2.4 (− 4 ~ + 5) | 3.58E-15 | 11.2 ± 1.5 (10 ~ 15) | 0.8 ± 2.1 (− 4 ~ + 6) | 3.35E-12 | 10.3 ± 2.5 (4 ~ 14) | 88.9% (16 /18) |
Group C ( | − 38.2 ± 5.2 (− 30 ~ − 50) | + 0.4 ± 3.7 (− 4 ~ 14) | 1.54E-18 | −24.8 ± 4.5 (− 20 ~ − 35) | + 1.6 ± 4.6 (− 4 ~ + 16) | 1.77E-10 | 13.3 ± 2.2 (10 ~ 15) | 0.9 ± 2.5 (−4 ~ + 8) | 1.38E-10 | 12.4 ± 3.9 (2 ~ 17) | 88.9% (16/18) |
| 0.415 | 0.039 | 0.285 | 0.490 | 1.52E-8 | 0.321 | 0.00011 | 0.452 | ||||
Deviation: -, exotropia; +, esotropia
Fig. 2The corrections of NDD in the three groups
The preoperative and postoperative results of the total fovea-disa angle, Up-down gaze deviation, Right side, Left side before and after surgery
| Total fovea-disa angle | difference of deviation | lateral incomitance at | lateral incomitance at | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preop | Postop | Preop | Postop | Preop | Postop | Preop | Postop | |||||
Group A ( | −11.4 ± 4.95 | − 10.8 ± 4.48 | 0.519 | − 1.23 ± 2.45 | −0.82 ± 1.92 | 0.488 | − 0.32 ± 1.99 | − 0.68 ± 1.84 | 0.589 | − 0.55 ± 1.60 | − 0.73 ± 2.03 | 0.758 |
Group B (n = 18) | −11.8 ± 4.97 | − 13.2 ± 3.43 | 0.264 | − 1.53 ± 3.52 | − 1.13 ± 1.89 | 0.710 | 0.27 ± 2.76 | − 0.73 ± 1.53 | 0.231 | 0.13 ± 1.73 | −0.47 ± 1.96 | 0.384 |
Group C (n = 18) | −10.5 ± 6.55 | −12.6 ± 3.41 | 0.213 | −1.55 ± 4.50 | 0.18 ± 3.52 | 0.430 | −0.64 ± 3.53 | −0.18 ± 0.75 | 0.676 | −0.27 ± 3.41 | − 0.73 ± 1.68 | 0.708 |
| 0.911 | 0.370 | 0.950 | 0.359 | 0.669 | 0.623 | 0.648 | 0.911 | |||||
athe deviation at up gaze minus the deviation at down gaze
For example, 8△ exotropia(−8△) at up gaze and 6△ (−6△) exotropia at down gaze, a = (− 8△) -(− 6△) = −2△
6△ exotropia (− 6△) at up gaze and 8△ (− 8△) exotropia at down gaze, a = (− 6△) -(− 8△) = 2△
bthe deviation in the primary position minus the deviation at the right or the left gaze
For example, 8△ exotropia(− 8△) in the primary position and 6△ (− 6△) exotropia at the left gaze, b = (− 8△) -(− 6△) = − 2△
The number of patients with different stereopsis before and after surgery
| Titmus≤60” | 60″<Titmus≤200” | 200″<Titmus≤400” | 400″<Titmus≤3000” | No stereopsis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preoperation ( | 11 | 24 | 12 | 5 | 6 |
Postopration ( | 35 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 3 |
Three cases without stereopsis were overcorrected after surgery