| Literature DB >> 35330470 |
Yulia Argunova1, Ekaterina Belik1, Olga Gruzdeva1, Sergey Ivanov1, Svetlana Pomeshkina1, Olga Barbarash1.
Abstract
Our aim in this study was to evaluate the effect of physical training performed before CABG on the perioperative dynamics of the serum levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) of patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD). Patients in the preoperative period were randomized into two groups: the training group (n = 43) underwent high-intensity treadmill training; the patients in the control group (n = 35) received no training before the procedure. The serum concentrations of ADMA and ET-1 were determined in the perioperative period, and the course of the early postoperative period was analyzed. In the training group, we found a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications during hospital stays (p = 0.013). At the end of the training program, the ADMA levels were 1.8 times higher in the controls than in the training group (p = 0.001). We found that type 2 diabetes increased the probability of complications by 12 times (OR: 12.3; 95% CI: 1.24-121.5; p = 0.03), as well as elevating the concentration of ET-1 on the eve of surgery (OR: 10.7; 95% CI: 1.4-81.3; p = 0.02). Physical prehabilitation reduced the likelihood of complications nine times (OR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.02-0.83; p = 0.03). The AUC was 0.851 ± 0.07 (95% CI: 0.71-0.98). The obtained results indicate the benefit of physical training during the prehabilitation stage since it can help to preserve endothelial function.Entities:
Keywords: coronary artery bypass surgery; coronary heart disease; endothelial dysfunction; physical training; prehabilitation; rehabilitation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35330470 PMCID: PMC8949238 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12030471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Med ISSN: 2075-4426
Clinical, anamnestic, and intraoperative characteristics of the patients.
| Parameters | Training Group | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 61.5 (55, 65) | 63.0 (56, 66) | 0.43 |
| Working patients, | 16 (37.2) | 12 (34.2) | 0.79 |
| BMI, kg/m2 (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 29.3 (25.9, 30.9) | 28.6 (26.4, 31.6) | 0.81 |
| Smoking, | 13 (30.2) | 10 (28.5) | 0.87 |
| EuroScore (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 0.75 (0.6, 0.79) | 0.84 (0.68, 0.9) | 0.36 |
| CHD duration, years (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 1.0 (0.5, 3.0) | 1.0 (0.5, 6.0) | 0.41 |
| AH, | 36 (83.7) | 33 (94.2) | 0.15 |
| AH duration, years (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 4.5 (2.0, 10.0) | 5.0 (3.0, 10.0) | 0.56 |
| AF, | 2 (4.6) | 2 (5.7) | 0.82 |
| Angina pectoris FC NYHA, | 10 (23.2) | 7 (20) | 0.73 |
| II | 29 (67.4) | 25 (71.4) | |
| III | 4 (9.3) | 3 (8.5) | |
| CHF FC NYHA, | 1 (2.3) | 0 | 0.36 |
| II | 42 (97.7) | 35 (100) | |
| Prior myocardial infarction, | 30 (69.7) | 22 (62.8) | 0.52 |
| History of prior stroke, | 3 (6.9) | 2 (5.7) | 0.83 |
| DM in medical history, | 9 (20.9) | 7 (20) | 0.92 |
| Severity of coronary lesions, SYNTAX score (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 24.2 (18.5, 29.8) | 23.8 (17.8, 28.3) | 0.43 |
| Operative time, min (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 200.0 (170.0, 220.0) | 210.0 (180.0, 240.0) | 0.68 |
| Aortic clamping, min (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 52.5 (48.0, 59.5) | 51.0 (46.0, 60.0) | 0.36 |
| CPB, min (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 78.5 (71.0, 89.0) | 82.0 (73.0, 95) | 0.27 |
| Number of shunts, | 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) | 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) | 0.98 |
| Cardioplegia infusion, | 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) | 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) | 0.98 |
| Lowest body temperature (before CPB), °C (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 35.7 (35.3, 35.8) | 35.7 (35.3, 35.7) | 0.96 |
| Lowest systolic BP, mm Hg (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 100.0 (93.0, 103.0) | 99.0 (92.0, 105.0) | 0.34 |
| Intraoperative blood loss, mL (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 500.0 (400.0, 500.0) | 500.0 (400.0, 500.0) | 0.97 |
| Total blood loss, mL (Me (Q25, Q75)) | 800.0 (650.0, 850.0) | 800.0 (700.0, 950.0) | 0.78 |
Note: AH—arterial hypertension; BP—blood pressure; CHD—coronary heart disease; CPB—cardiopulmonary bypass; BMI—body mass index; DM—diabetes mellitus; FC—functional class; and CHF—chronic heart failure.
Echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise test results for the patients according to the approach to prehabilitation.
| Parameters (Me (Q25, Q75)) | Training Group | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| LV EF, % | 63.0 (60.0, 67.0) | 64.0 (61.0, 66.0) | 0.96 |
| LV EDV, mL | 147.5 (130.0, 173.0) | 147.0 (130.0, 180.0) | 0.24 |
| LV EDD, mL | 54.0 (47.0, 74.0) | 51.0 (44.0, 62.0) | 0.23 |
| LV ESV, cm | 5.5 (5.2, 5.9) | 5.5 (5.2, 6.0) | 0.31 |
| LV ESD, cm | 3.6 (3.4, 4.1) | 3.5 (3.3, 3.8) | 0.47 |
| VO2 peak, mL/kg/min | 15.3 (13.4, 18.3) | 15.7 (13.7, 17.1) | 0.64 |
| VO2 peak, % | 59.0 (55.0, 70.0) | 63.0 (54.0, 69.0) | 0.78 |
| AT, mL/kg/min | 11.9 (10.3, 14.9) | 12.5 (10.9, 15.7) | 0.24 |
| AT, % | 47.5 (43.0, 59.0) | 49.5 (44.0, 62.0) | 0.15 |
| Peak heart rate, bpm | 110 (98, 126) | 112 (97, 129) | 0.57 |
| Exercise tolerance, W | 75.0 (75.0, 100.0) | 87.5 (75.0, 100.0) | 0.78 |
Note: AT—anaerobic threshold; LV EDV—end diastolic volume of the left ventricle; LV EDD—end diastolic dimension of the left ventricle; LV ESV—end systolic volume of the left ventricle; LV ESD—end systolic dimension of the left ventricle; LV EF—left ventricular ejection fraction; and VO2 peak—peak oxygen consumption.
Postoperative complications of patients after coronary bypass surgery according to the prehabilitation program.
| Parameters | Training Group | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined endpoint, | 5 (11.6) | 13 (37) | 0.013 |
| Myocardial infarct, | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 0.44 |
| Stroke, | 1 (2.3) | 1 (2.8) | 0.56 |
| Arrhythmias, | 2 (4.6) | 3 (8.5) | 0.65 |
| Heart failure, | 2 (4.6) | 6 (17) | 0.13 |
| Hydrothorax, | 0 | 2 (5.7) | 0.19 |
| Hydropericardium, | 0 | 0 | - |
| Pneumonia, | 0 | 2 (5.7) | 0.19 |
| MODS, | 0 | 0 | - |
| Wound complications, | 0 | 0 | - |
Figure 1Changes in concentration of asymmetric dimethylarginine in the perioperative period for patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery according to the prehabilitation program.
Estimates of glomerular filtration rate in the perioperative period for patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery according to the approach to prehabilitation.
| eGFR (CKD-EPI), | Training Group ( | Controls ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 81.0 (73.0, 92.0) | 78.0 (69.0, 91.0) | 0.43 |
| On the eve of CABG | 83.0 (74.0, 95.0) | 82.0 (71.0, 92.0) | 0.54 |
| 5–7 days after CABG | 85.0 (75.0, 99.5) | 85.0 (68.0, 97.0) | 0.78 |
Figure 2Changes in endothelin-1 concentration in the perioperative period for the patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery according to the approach to prehabilitation.
Figure 3ROC curve characterizing the dependence of the probability of complications in the early postoperative period on the values of the P logistic function.