| Literature DB >> 35330288 |
Wei Liu1,2, Shu-Hui Yu3, Hong-Ping Zhang3, Zuo-Yi Fu1,2, Jia-Qi An1,2, Jin-Yang Zhang4, Pu Yang1,2.
Abstract
Insects encounter infection of microorganisms, and they also harbor endosymbiosis to participate in nutrition providing and act as a defender against pathogens. We previously found the Chinese white wax scale insect, Ericerus pela, was infected and killed by Cladosporium sp. (pathogen). We also found it harbored Cladosporium sp. (endogensis). In this study, we cultured these two Cladosporium fungi and sequenced their genome. The results showed Cladosporium sp. (endogensis) has a larger genome size and more genes than Cladosporium sp. (pathogen). Pan-genome analysis showed Cladosporium sp. (endogensis)-specific genes enriched in pathways related to nutrition production, such as amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and energy metabolism. These pathways were absent in that of Cladosporium sp. (pathogen). Gene Ontology analysis showed Cladosporium sp. (pathogen)-specific genes enriched in the biosynthesis of asperfuranone, emericellamide, and fumagillin. These terms were not found in that of Cladosporium sp. (endogensis). Pathogen Host Interactions analysis found Cladosporium sp. (endogensis) had more genes related to loss of pathogenicity and reduced virulence than Cladosporium sp. (pathogen). Cytotoxicity assay indicated Cladosporium sp. (pathogen) had cytotoxicity, while Cladosporium sp. (endogensis) had no cytotoxicity. These characters reflect the adaptation of endosymbiosis to host-restricted lifestyle and the invader of the entomopathogen to the host.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese white wax scale insect; Cladosporium; adaptation; endogensis; genome; pathogen
Year: 2022 PMID: 35330288 PMCID: PMC8949958 DOI: 10.3390/jof8030286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
The species name and accession number of five genome sequenced fungi from Cladosporium genus used in this study.
| Species Name | Accession Number in GenBank |
|---|---|
|
| QZFA00000000 |
| AIIA02 | |
| PEGC00000000.1 | |
| JAAQHG000000000.1 | |
|
| NOXB01 |
Figure 1The cultured fungi on the medium dishes at different magnifications. (A–C): Cladosporium sp. (pathogen); (D–F): Cladosporium sp. (endogensis).
Figure 2Circular representation of the genomes of Cladosporium sp. (pathogen) and Cladosporium sp. (endogensis). (A) Cladosporium sp. (endogensis) genome; (B) Cladosporium sp. (pathogen) genome.
Scaffold and contig analyses of Cladosporium sp. (pathogen) and Cladosporium sp. (endogensis) genome assembly.
| Sequence Type | Sample | Total Number | Total Length (bp) | N50 Length (bp) | N90 Length (bp) | Max Length (bp) | Min Length (bp) | Gap Number (bp) | GC Content |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scaffold | 25 | 30,678,857 | 1,877,121 | 1,391,070 | 5,850,328 | 22,622 | 89,418 | 53.05% | |
| 46 | 35,677,347 | 1,764,234 | 4,247,99 | 3,136,047 | 11,843 | 23,760 | 52.58% | ||
| Contig | 49 | 30,589,439 | 1,610,294 | 428,466 | 3,437,199 | 22,329 | - | 53.05% | |
| 55 | 35,653,587 | 1,749,682 | 37,981,6 | 25,907,13 | 11,843 | - | 52.58% |
The statistic of repeat sequence from different predication methods.
| Method | Sample | Repeat Size (bp) | Percent in Genome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repbase | 240,641 | 0.7844% | |
| 252,517 | 0.7078% | ||
| ProMask | 490,596 | 1.5991% | |
| 525,112 | 1.4718% | ||
| denovo | 758,713 | 2.4731% | |
| 1,150,874 | 3.2258% | ||
| TRF | 155,625 | 0.5073% | |
| 190746 | 0.5346% | ||
| Total | 1,125,929 | 3.67% | |
| 1,572,493 | 4.4075% |
None-code RNA in the genome of Cladosporium sp. (pathogen) and Cladosporium sp. (endogensis).
| Type | Sample | Copy | Average Length | Total Length | Percent in Genome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tRNA | 221 | 92 | 20,406 | 0.0665% | |
| 274 | 91 | 25,030 | 0.0702% | ||
| rRNA (by denovo prediction) | 82 | 1237 | 101,498 | 0.3308% | |
| 80 | 465 | 37,235 | 0.1044% | ||
| sRNA | 10 | 58 | 581 | 0.0019% | |
| 46 | 88 | 4044 | 0.0113% | ||
| snRNA | 4 | 58 | 232 | 0.0008% | |
| 34 | 113 | 3848 | 0.0108% | ||
| miRNA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 64 | 60 | 3877 | 0.0109% |
The exons and coding sequence statistic of genes of Cladosporium sp. (pathogen) and Cladosporium sp. (endogensis).
| Type | Sample | Total Number | Total Length (bp) | Average Length (bp) | Percent in Genome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | 10,930 | 17,633,154 | 1613 | 57.48% | |
| 13,522 | 21,235,259 | 1570 | 59.52% | ||
| Exons | 25,247 | 16,208,934 | 642 | 52.83% | |
| 31,128 | 19,653,616 | 631 | 55.09% | ||
| CDS | 10,930 | 16,208,934 | 1483 | 52.83% | |
| 13,522 | 19,653,616 | 1453 | 55.09% | ||
| Introne | 14,317 | 1,424,220 | 99 | 4.64% | |
| 17,606 | 1,581,643 | 90 | 4.43% |
The statistic of gene classification and functional annotation of Cladosporium sp. (pathogen) and Cladosporium sp. (endogensis) using different databases.
| Number | Percent | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annotation Database | ||||
| Total | 10,930 | 13,522 | ||
| NR | 9255 | 10,627 | 84.67% | 78.59% |
| SWISSPROT | 3187 | 3456 | 29.15% | 25.55% |
| GO | 6185 | 7331 | 56.58% | 54.21% |
| KEGG | 4202 | 4569 | 38.44% | 33.78% |
| KOG | 2151 | 2237 | 19.67% | 16.54% |
| COG | 1337 | 1506 | 12.23% | 11.13% |
| NOG | 7799 | 8835 | 71.35% | 65.33% |
| IPR | 8405 | 10,064 | 76.89% | 74.42% |
| CAZY | 433 | 544 | 3.96% | 4.02% |
| DBCAN | 583 | 725 | 5.33% | 5.36% |
| PHI | 1143 | 1202 | 10.45% | 8.89% |
| P450 | 1762 | 2202 | 16.12% | 16.28% |
| KINASE | 115 | 133 | 1.05% | 0.98% |
| CARD | 0 | 1 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| TCDB | 565 | 614 | 5.16% | 4.54% |
| PHOSPHATASE | 34 | 36 | 0.31% | 0.26% |
| Over All | 9702 | 11,566 | 88.76% | 85.53% |
Figure 3Core and specific genes of Cladosporium sp. (pathogen) and Cladosporium sp. (endogensis) and other five genomes sequenced of Cladosporium.
Figure 4COG analyses of the specific genes of Cladosporium sp. (pathogen) and Cladosporium sp. (endogensis) and other five Cladosporium fungi.
Figure 5The phylogenetic tree of 68 species constructed by the sequence of ITS, tef-1α, and act. According to Bensch et al. (2012) [49], the Cladosporium fungi were divided into three groups: group 1, the C. cladosporioides complex; group 2, the C. herbarum complex; and group 3, C. sphaerospermum complex. The three groups are shown in the figure.
Figure 6The synteny analyses of Cladosporium sp. (endogensis) and Cladosporium sp. (pathogen) at the nucleic acid level and the amino acid level. (A) nucleic acid level; (B): amino acid level.
Figure 7Cytotoxicity assay of Cladosporium sp. (pathogen), Cladosporium sp. (endogensis), and DMSO using Aedes albopictus C6/36 cell line. Three biological replications were performed. Standard deviations (SD) were shown by the error bar at the volume points. Different capital letters of the same volume point represented the significant differences among the three treatments, p < 0.01.