| Literature DB >> 35330180 |
Ritu Garg1, Manja Luckner2, Jürgen Berger3, Katharina Hipp3, Gerhard Wanner2, Karl Forchhammer1, Iris Maldener1.
Abstract
Planktonic freshwater filamentous cyanobacterium Trichormus variabilis ATCC 29413 (previously known as Anabaena variabilis) can differentiate heterocysts and akinetes to survive under different stress conditions. Whilst heterocysts enable diazotrophic growth, akinetes are spore-like resting cells that make the survival of the species possible under adverse growth conditions. Under suitable environmental conditions, they germinate to produce new vegetative filaments. Several morphological and physiological changes occur during akinete formation and germination. Here, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), we found that the mature akinetes had a wrinkled envelope, and the surface of the envelope smoothened as the cell size increased during germination. Thereupon, the akinete envelope ruptured to release the short emerging filament. Focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB/SEM) tomography of immature akinetes revealed the presence of cytoplasmic granules, presumably consisting of cyanophycin or glycogen. In addition, the akinete envelope architecture of different layers, the exopolysaccharide and glycolipid layers, could be visualized. We found that this multilayered envelope helped to withstand osmotic stress and to maintain the structural integrity. Furthermore, by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) measurements, using the fluorescent tracer calcein, we found that intercellular communication decreased during akinete formation as compared with the vegetative cells. In contrast, freshly germinating filaments restored cell communication.Entities:
Keywords: FIB/SEM tomography; FRAP; Trichormus variabilis; akinetes; cell-cell communication; cyanobacteria
Year: 2022 PMID: 35330180 PMCID: PMC8953462 DOI: 10.3390/life12030429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Figure 1Scanning electron micrographs of Trichormus variabilis. (A) Young vegetative filament. (B) Two-month-old mature akinetes induced under low-light conditions.
Figure 2Three-dimensional visualization of akinetes from FIB/SEM tomogram of T. variabilis. (A) Illustration of FIB-milling process with T. variabilis filament after flat embedding in SEM. Box denotes the targeted cells for FIB-miling; shaded parts indicate horizontal or vertical cross-sectioning of cells. (B,C) SEM images of two-month-old akinete after longitudinal (B), then transversal (C) FIB milling. White arrowheads indicate the cytoplasmic granules in immature akinete. Use of 3D glasses is recommended.
Figure 3Akinetes are resistant to osmotic stress. (A) Bright-field images of vegetative filaments and akinetes treated with 40% sucrose for 20 min. Scale bar, 10 µm. (B) Cell-length measurement using ImageJ before and after sucrose treatment of vegetative cells and akinetes. (C) SEM images of vegetative filaments and akinetes after treatment with 40% sucrose.
Figure 4SEM analysis of akinete germination and cellular growth of T. variabilis at different time intervals. (a) Mature akinetes before germination; (b) akinete germination on day 1; (c) germinated filament inside the envelope on day 2; (d) cellular growth and trichome development on day 3, with attached envelope; (e) growing filament with terminal heterocyst differentiation in BG110 medium on day 3. White arrowhead points to the terminally differentiated heterocyst. Scale bar, 10 μm.
Figure 5Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis of the intercellular exchange of calcein during akinete differentiation and germination. (A) Cell–cell communication during akinete differentiation in low light over a span of 18 days. Numbers in bars indicate the number of analyzed cells (n) from different filaments subjected to FRAP analysis. Data are mean ± SD from the results obtained from three independent cultures. (B) Regaining of cell–cell communication during akinete germination up to 72 h in fresh medium and optimum light conditions. Numbers within the bars indicate number of analyzed cells (n) from different filaments subjected to FRAP analysis. Data are mean ± SD from three independent cultures.