| Literature DB >> 35329841 |
Eva Christin Weber1,2, Brigitte Strizek2, Florian Recker2, Annegret Geipel2, Ulrich Gembruch2, Christoph Berg1,2, Ingo Gottschalk1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To review the outcome of complicated monochorionic pregnancies after fetoscopic selective feticide with bipolar cord coagulation in an experienced German center.Entities:
Keywords: bipolar cord coagulation; discordant anomaly; monochorionic twin pregnancy; selective feticide; selective growth restriction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35329841 PMCID: PMC8950483 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061516
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1Occlusion of the umbilical cord (UC) with bipolar forceps (BF) at multiple levels. The level of the preceding coagulation (C) is depicted at 12 o’clock.
Figure 2Dissection of the coagulated umbilical cord (UC) with a 3 Charr. grasping forceps (GF) and a bare laser fiber (LF).
Figure 3Mortality rate of 56 monochorionic cases that underwent selective feticide.
Five groups according to indication for selective feticide.
| Indication | All ( | DA | MA | DC TA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discordant anomaly | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 |
| Selective IUGR | 29 | 26 | 0 | 3 |
| Type I | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Type II | 16 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| Type III | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| TTTS | 13 | 11 | 2 | 1 |
| TTTS II° | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| TTTS III° | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| TTTS IV° | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Recipients | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 |
| Donors | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| TRAP sequence | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| TAPS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
DA, diamniotic; DC, dichorionic; IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; MA, monoamniotic; TA, triamniotic; TAPS, twin anemia polycythemia sequence; TRAP, twin reversed arterial perfusion; TTTS, twin-twin transfusion syndrome.
Characteristics and outcomes of 56 cases after selective feticide, given in median (interquartile range (IQR), Q1–Q3).
| Characteristic | All | Discordant Anomaly | sIUGR | TTTS | TRAP Sequence | TAPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA at presentation (weeks) | 20.2 (17.5–22.3) | 21.6 (16.7–25.3) | 20.1 (17.3–22.4) | 19.5 (18.9–21.7) | 18.5 (14.1–n.a.) | 21.5 |
| GA at intervention (weeks) | 21.2 (19.5–23.1) | 21.9 (19.1–29.4) | 21.6 (20.6–23.3) | 20.0 (19.2–22.7) | 19.0 (16.1–n.a.) | 21.5 |
| IUD (weeks) | 21.1 (20.1–21.7) | - | 21.6 (21.1–21.6) | 19.6 | 20.9 (20.5–n.a.) | - |
| Intervention until IUD (weeks) | 1.4 (0.0–4.4) | - | 1.8 (0.0–n.a.) | 1.4 | 2.6 (0.0–n.a.) | - |
| PPROM (weeks) | 32.5 (25.6–35.5) | 36.2 | 32.0 (29.1–33.9) | 30.0 (23.7–35.9) | - | - |
| 23–34 weeks ( | 7 | 0 | 5 | 2 | ||
| 34–36 weeks ( | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Intervention until PPROM (weeks) | 10.0 (3.5–15.3) | 16.6 | 9.6 (6.6–10.4) | 9.4 (2.8–16.1) | - | - |
| GA at delivery (weeks) | 37.1 (32.0–38.3) | 36.1 (32.6–37.6) | 37.6 (31.1–38.5) | 36.3 (34.6–38.0) | 39.0 | 38.6 |
| Intervention until delivery (weeks) | 14.1 (7.6–17.4) | 7.5 (4.3–17.5) | 13.0 (8.5–17.6) | 15.4 (12.3–17.1) | 20.0 | 17.1 |
| PTD ( | 25 (44.6%) | 6 (60.0%) | 12 (41.4%) | 7 (53.8%) | - | - |
| ≤28 weeks ( | 6 (10.7%) | 1 (10.0%) | 4 (13.8%) | 1 (7.7%) | ||
| 28–31.6 weeks ( | 6 (10.7%) | 1 (10.0%) | 4 (13.8%) | 1 (7.7%) | ||
| 32–36 weeks ( | 13 (23.2%) | 4 (40.0%) | 4 (13.8%) | 5 (38.5%) | ||
| Birth weight (g) | 2500 (1840–3000) | 2525 (1792–2940) | 2500 (1450–3280) | 2400 (1841–2633) | 2402 | 2550 |
| IUD | 5 (8.9%) | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| NND | 2 (3.6%) | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PPROM | 11 (19.6%) | 1 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Perinatal Survival | 49 (87.5%) | 10 (100%) | 25 (86.2%) | 12 (92.3%) | 1 (33.3%) | 1 (100%) |
n.a., not applicable.