| Literature DB >> 35329696 |
Nikos Guskos1, Grzegorz Zolnierkiewicz1, Ewelina Kusiak-Nejman2, Aleksander Guskos1, Konstantinos Aidinis3, Marta Bobrowska1, Paweł Berczynski1, Agnieszka Wanag2, Iwona Pelech2, Urszula Narkiewicz2, Antoni W Morawski2.
Abstract
Nanocomposites based on nanocrystalline titania modified with graphene-related materials (reduced and oxidized form of graphene) showed the existence of magnetic agglomerates. All parameters of magnetic resonance spectra strongly depended on the materials' modification processes. The reduction of graphene oxide significantly increased the number of magnetic moments, which caused crucial changes in the reorientation and relaxation processes. At room temperature, a wide resonance line dominated for all nanocomposites studied and in some cases, a narrow resonance line derived from the conduction electrons. Some nanocomposites (samples of titania modified with graphene oxide, prepared with the addition of water or butan-1-ol) showed a single domain magnetic (ferromagnetic) arrangement, and others (samples of titania modified with reduced graphene oxide) exhibited magnetic anisotropy. In addition, the spectra of EPR from free radicals were observed for all samples at the temperature of 4 K. The magnetic resonance imaging methods enable the capturing of even a small number of localized magnetic moments, which significantly affects the physicochemical properties of the materials.Entities:
Keywords: graphene; magnetic arrangement; magnetic moments; magnetic resonance; titania
Year: 2022 PMID: 35329696 PMCID: PMC8949220 DOI: 10.3390/ma15062244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Magnetic resonance spectra obtained at (a) 4 K and (b) RT for the nanocomposite TiO2-1ButOH_A.
Figure 2Magnetic resonance spectra measured at (a) 4 K and (b) RT for nanocomposite TiO2-1ButOH-GO_5%_A.
The parameters: geff, line width, integrated intensity, and the difference between resonance fields for modified nanocomposites TiO2 at room temperature.
| Nanocomposites | geff | ΔHpp (G) | I/I1 | ΔHr (G) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2-1ButOH_A | 2.162(1) | 912(3) | 1.00 | |
| TiO2-H2O-GO_5%_A | 2.025(1) | 537(3) | 0.07 | |
| TiO2-1ButOH-GO_5%_A | 2.010(1) | 397(3) | 0.09 | |
| TiO2-GO_5%_M | 2.013(1) | 336(1) | 0.11 | |
| TiO2-H2O-rGO_5%_A | 3.038(90) | 1138(63) | 0.36 | 980 |
| TiO2-1ButOH-rGO_5%_A | 2.644(14) | 1701(22) | 2.85 | 717 |
| TiO2-rGO_5%_M | 2.669(17) | 1838(28) | 1.94 | 772 |
Figure 3The fitting by the Lorentzian function obtained for the nanocomposite TiO2-1ButOH-GO_5%_A.
Figure 4The fitting by Lorentzian and Gaussian function obtained for the nanocomposite (a) TiO2-H2O-rGO_5%_A; (b) TiO2-1ButOH-rGO_5%_A; (c) TiO2-rGO_5%_M.