| Literature DB >> 35329594 |
Piotr Kulinowski1, Piotr Malczewski1, Marta Łaszcz2, Ewelina Baran1, Bartłomiej Milanowski3,4, Mateusz Kuprianowicz4, Przemysław Dorożyński5,6.
Abstract
3D printing by selective laser sintering (SLS) of high-dose drug delivery systems using pure brittle crystalline active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) is possible but impractical. Currently used pharmaceutical grade excipients, including polymers, are primarily designed for powder compression, ensuring good mechanical properties. Using these excipients for SLS usually leads to poor mechanical properties of printed tablets (printlets). Composite printlets consisting of sintered carbon-stained polyamide (PA12) and metronidazole (Met) were manufactured by SLS to overcome the issue. The printlets were characterized using DSC and IR spectroscopy together with an assessment of mechanical properties. Functional properties of the printlets, i.e., drug release in USP3 and USP4 apparatus together with flotation assessment, were evaluated. The printlets contained 80 to 90% of Met (therapeutic dose ca. 600 mg), had hardness above 40 N (comparable with compressed tablets) and were of good quality with internal porous structure, which assured flotation. The thermal stability of the composite material and the identity of its constituents were confirmed. Elastic PA12 mesh maintained the shape and structure of the printlets during drug dissolution and flotation. Laser speed and the addition of an osmotic agent in low content influenced drug release virtually not changing composition of the printlet; time to release 80% of Met varied from 0.5 to 5 h. Composite printlets consisting of elastic insoluble PA12 mesh filled with high content of crystalline Met were manufactured by 3D SLS printing. Dissolution modification by the addition of an osmotic agent was demonstrated. The study shows the need to define the requirements for excipients dedicated to 3D printing and to search for appropriate materials for this purpose.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; composite materials; drug delivery; floating dosage forms; gastroretentive drug delivery systems; metronidazole; nylon; pharmaceutical additive manufacturing; polyamide 12; powder bed fusion
Year: 2022 PMID: 35329594 PMCID: PMC8950795 DOI: 10.3390/ma15062142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Compositions expressed as volumetric () and weight () percent of components in printlets formulations and laser speed parameters.
| Metronidazole | PA12 | Sodium Chloride | Laser Speed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (% | (% | (% | (% | (% | (% | ||
| Formulation A (80/20/0/100) | 80 | 84.1 | 20 | 15.9 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Formulation B (80/18/2/100) | 80 | 81.7 | 18 | 13.9 | 2 | 4.4 | 100 |
| Formulation C (80/20/0/150) | 80 | 84.1 | 20 | 15.9 | 0 | 0 | 150 |
| Formulation D | 90 | 92.2 | 10 | 7.8 | 0 | 0 | 75 |
Figure 1The example of printlet: (a) technical drawing (dimensions in mm), (b) printed Formulation A (80/20/0/100).
Figure 2SEM images of (a) Formulation A (80/20/0/100) at 40× magnification; (b) Formulation D (90/10/0/75) at 50× magnification; (c) Formulation A (80/20/0/100) at 100× magnification; (d) Formulation D (90/10/0/75) at 100× magnification. The markings are commented on in the text.
Figure 3DSC curves of pure Met, PA12 and physical mixtures Met/PA12 (90/10 and 80/20).
Figure 4DSC curves of printlets from Formulation A (80/20/0/100) and Formulation D (90/10/0/75).
Figure 5DSC curves from the thermal loop of Met (blue), PA12 (green), mixture (black) and Formulation A printlet (red); the 3rd segment-cooling from 200 °C to −60 °C.
Figure 6IR-ATR spectra of the pure components and physical mixtures of powders (a) in the range of 3700–2400 cm−1; (b) in the range of 1850–650 cm−1.
Figure 7IR-ATR spectra of the printlets and corresponding physical mixtures (a) in the range of 3040–2800 cm−1; (b) in the range of 1710–1400 cm−1.
Figure 8The mean release profiles (n = 3) of Met from printlets in the USP4 apparatus.
Mean apparent density of formulations obtained by SLS (n = 10) and results of buoyancy observations in Apparatus 4.
| Formulation A (80/20/0/100) | Formulation B (80/18/2/100) | Formulation C (80/20/0/150) | Formulation D (90/10/0/75) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean apparent density (g/cm3) | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.82 |
| SD ( | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Buoyancy lag time (min) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| Total floating time (min) | 30 | 60 | 600 | 100 |
Figure 9Flotation of Formulation C (80/20/0/150) in USP4 apparatus after 10 h of the experiment.
Figure 10The mean release profiles (n = 3) of Met from 3D printlets in the USP3 apparatus.