Literature DB >> 35329543

Influence of 3D Printing Parameters on the Mechanical Stability of PCL Scaffolds and the Proliferation Behavior of Bone Cells.

Fabian Huber1,2, David Vollmer1,2, Johannes Vinke2, Bianca Riedel1, Sergej Zankovic1, Hagen Schmal1, Michael Seidenstuecker1.   

Abstract

Introduction The use of scaffolds in tissue engineering is becoming increasingly important as solutions need to be found for the problem of preserving human tissue, such as bone or cartilage. In this work, scaffolds were printed from the biomaterial known as polycaprolactone (PCL) on a 3D Bioplotter. Both the external and internal geometry were varied to investigate their influence on mechanical stability and biocompatibility. Materials and
Methods: An Envisiontec 3D Bioplotter was used to fabricate the scaffolds. First, square scaffolds were printed with variations in the strand width and strand spacing. Then, the filling structure was varied: either lines, waves, and honeycombs were used. This was followed by variation in the outer shape, produced as either a square, hexagon, octagon, or circle. Finally, the internal and external geometry was varied. To improve interaction with the cells, the printed PCL scaffolds were coated with type-I collagen. MG-63 cells were then cultured on the scaffolds and various tests were performed to investigate the biocompatibility of the scaffolds.
Results: With increasing strand thickness and strand spacing, the compressive strengths decreased from 86.18 + 2.34 MPa (200 µm) to 46.38 + 0.52 MPa (600 µm). The circle was the outer shape with the highest compressive strength of 76.07 + 1.49 MPa, compared to the octagon, which had the lowest value of 52.96 ± 0.98 MPa. Varying the external shape (toward roundness) geometry, as well as the filling configuration, resulted in the highest values of compressive strength for the round specimens with honeycomb filling, which had a value of 91.4 + 1.4 MPa. In the biocompatibility tests, the round specimens with honeycomb filling also showed the highest cell count per mm2, with 1591 ± 239 live cells/mm2 after 10 days and the highest value in cell proliferation, but with minimal cytotoxic effects (9.19 ± 2.47% after 3 days).

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; PCL scaffold; biocompatibility; geometry variation; mechanical properties

Year:  2022        PMID: 35329543      PMCID: PMC8954149          DOI: 10.3390/ma15062091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


  35 in total

1.  Bone tissue regeneration: the role of scaffold geometry.

Authors:  Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 6.843

Review 2.  Collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Julie Glowacki; Shuichi Mizuno
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.505

3.  Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  Gerald Zimmermann; Arash Moghaddam
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 4.  Long-term implant fixation and stress-shielding in total hip replacement.

Authors:  D R Sumner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Characterization of polylactic acid-polyglycolic acid composites for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  John M Moran; David Pazzano; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2003-02

6.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis.

Authors:  R Huiskes; H Weinans; H J Grootenboer; M Dalstra; B Fudala; T J Slooff
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Fabrication and mechanical characterization of 3D printed vertical uniform and gradient scaffolds for bone and osteochondral tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sean M Bittner; Brandon T Smith; Luis Diaz-Gomez; Carrigan D Hudgins; Anthony J Melchiorri; David W Scott; John P Fisher; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Design of porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering using a three-dimensional fiber-deposition technique.

Authors:  T B F Woodfield; J Malda; J de Wijn; F Péters; J Riesle; C A van Blitterswijk
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  A novel open-porous magnesium scaffold with controllable microstructures and properties for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Meng-qi Cheng; Tuerhongjiang Wahafu; Guo-feng Jiang; Wei Liu; Yu-qin Qiao; Xiao-chun Peng; Tao Cheng; Xian-long Zhang; Guo He; Xuan-yong Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management.

Authors:  Gabriel Fernandez de Grado; Laetitia Keller; Ysia Idoux-Gillet; Quentin Wagner; Anne-Marie Musset; Nadia Benkirane-Jessel; Fabien Bornert; Damien Offner
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 7.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.