| Literature DB >> 35329512 |
Maria Idrees1, Husnain Ahmad Chaudhary1, Arslan Akbar2, Abdeliazim Mustafa Mohamed3,4, Dina Fathi5.
Abstract
Flexural strength of concrete is an important property, especially for pavements. Concrete with higher flexural strength has fewer cracking and durability issues. Researchers use different materials, including fibers, polymers, and admixtures, to increase the flexural strength of concrete. Silicon carbide and tungsten carbide are some of the hardest materials on earth. In this research, the mechanical properties of carbide concrete composites were investigated. The silicon carbide and tungsten carbide at different percentages (1%, 2%, 3%, and 4%) by weight of cement along with hybrid silicon carbide and tungsten carbide (2% and 4%) were used to produce eleven mixes of concrete composites. The mechanical tests, including a compressive strength test and flexural strength test, along with the rapid chloride permeability test (RCPT), were conducted. It was concluded that mechanical properties were enhanced by increasing the percentages of both individual and hybrid carbides. The compressive strength was increased by 17% using 4% tungsten carbide, while flexural strength was increased by 39% at 4% tungsten carbide. The significant effect of carbides on flexural strength was also corroborated by ANOVA analysis. The improvement in flexural strength makes both carbides desirable for use in concrete pavement. Additionally, the permeability, the leading cause of durability issues, was reduced considerably by using tungsten carbide. It was concluded that both carbides provide promising results by enhancing the mechanical properties of concrete and are compatible with concrete to produce composites.Entities:
Keywords: compressive strength; flexural strength; permeability; silica carbide; tungsten carbide
Year: 2022 PMID: 35329512 PMCID: PMC8953363 DOI: 10.3390/ma15062061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition and properties of cement.
| Sr. | Composition/Properties | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | % SiO2 | 19.67 |
| 2 | % Al2O3 | 4.90 |
| 3 | % Fe2O3 | 3.46 |
| 4 | % CaO | 63.11 |
| 5 | % MgO | 1.85 |
| 6 | % K2O | 0.96 |
| 7 | % Na2O | 0.16 |
| 8 | % SO3 | 2.71 |
| 9 | % Cl | 0.012 |
| 10 | Blain, cm2/gm | 3078 |
| 11 | Consistency | 30 |
| 12 | Initial Setting Time | 110 min |
| 13 | Final Setting Time | 220 min |
| 14 | Specific Gravity | 3.13 |
Figure 1Gradation Curve for Fine aggregate (Sand) and Coarse Aggregate.
Figure 2Tungsten carbide (top) and silicon carbide (bottom).
Properties of WC and SiC.
| Elements | Color | True Density |
|---|---|---|
| SiC | Greyish-black lustrous solid | 3216 kg/m3 |
| WC | Grey | 15,630 kg/m3 |
Composition of Prepared Samples.
| Mix ID | Cement | Sand | Coarse Aggregate | Water | SP | WC | SiC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control | 430 | 688 | 1118 | 190 | 4.3 | - | - |
| 2 | WC1% | 430 | 688 | 1118 | 190 | 4.3 | 4.3 | - |
| 3 | WC2% | 430 | 688 | 1118 | 190 | 4.3 | 8.6 | - |
| 4 | WC3% | 430 | 688 | 1118 | 190 | 4.3 | 12.3 | - |
| 5 | WC4% | 430 | 688 | 1118 | 190 | 4.3 | 17.2 | - |
| 6 | SiC 1% | 430 | 688 | 1118 | 190 | 4.3 | - | 4.3 |
| 7 | SiC 2% | 430 | 688 | 1118 | 190 | 4.3 | - | 8.6 |
| 8 | SiC 3% | 430 | 688 | 1118 | 190 | 4.3 | - | 12.3 |
| 9 | SiC 4% | 430 | 688 | 1118 | 190 | 4.3 | - | 17.2 |
| 10 | WC + SiC(1% + 1%) | 430 | 688 | 1118 | 190 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| 11 | WC + SiC(2% + 2%) | 430 | 688 | 1118 | 190 | 4.3 | 8.6 | 8.6 |
Figure 3Experimental scheme (a) samples, (b) mechanical testing, (c) RCPT test setup.
Figure 4Density of all samples.
Figure 5Compressive Strength of Specimens at 28 days.
Figure 6Flexural Strength of Specimens at 28 days.
Figure 7Flexural Strength Variation with the increase in WC percentage.
ANOVA for Flexural Strength Variation with increased WC percentage.
| Summary | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Control | 4 | 21.936 | 5.484 | 0.05012376 | |||
| SiC1% | 4 | 23.1117 | 5.777925 | 0.00687578 | |||
| SiC2% | 4 | 24.6323 | 6.158075 | 0.43214339 | |||
| SiC2% | 4 | 24.6323 | 6.158075 | 0.43214339 | |||
| SiC3% | 4 | 25.0893 | 6.272325 | 0.30265701 | |||
| SiC4% | 4 | 30.5733 | 7.643325 | 2.04863465 | |||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Between Groups | 11.03379 | 4 | 2.758447 | 4.855677 | 0.0103038 | 3.055568 | Significant |
| Within Groups | 8.521304 | 15 | 0.568087 | ||||
| Total | 19.55509 | 19 | |||||
Figure 8Flexural Strength Variation with the increase in SiC percentage.
ANOVA for Flexural Strength Variation with the increase in SiC percentage.
| Summary | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Control | 4 | 21.936 | 5.484 | 0.05012376 | |||
| WC1% | 4 | 22.4844 | 5.6211 | 0.22555692 | |||
| WC2% | 4 | 22.1766 | 5.54415 | 0.08482964 | |||
| WC3% | 4 | 25.592 | 6.398 | 1.09019178 | |||
| WC4% | 4 | 26.4146 | 6.60365 | 0.06892017 | |||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Between Groups | 4.464174 | 4 | 1.11604359 | 3.67210858 | 0.0281423 | 3.055568 | Significant |
| Within Groups | 4.558867 | 15 | 0.30392445 | ||||
| Total | 9.023041 | 19 | |||||
Figure 9Rapid Chloride Permeability Test of Specimens.
Figure 10FESEM results for (a) control sample, (b–d) WC4% sample and (e,f) SiC4% samples.