| Literature DB >> 35329508 |
Jin-Ji Dai1,2, Thi Thu Mai1, Umeshwar Reddy Nallasani1, Shao-Chien Chang1, Hsin-I Hsiao1, Ssu-Kuan Wu1, Cheng-Wei Liu1, Hua-Chiang Wen1, Wu-Ching Chou1, Chieh-Piao Wang2, Luc Huy Hoang3.
Abstract
The high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) structures on Si (111) substrates were fabricated with heavily Fe-doped GaN buffer layers by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). The heavy Fe concentrations employed for the purpose of highly insulating buffer resulted in Fe segregation and 3D island growth, which played the role of a nano-mask. The in situ reflectance measurements revealed a transition from 2D to 3D growth mode during the growth of a heavily Fe-doped GaN:Fe layer. The 3D growth mode of Fe nano-mask can effectively annihilate edge-type threading dislocations and improve transfer properties in the channel layer, and consequently decrease the vertical leakage current by one order of magnitude for the applied voltage of 1000 V. Moreover, the employment of GaN:C film on GaN:Fe buffer can further reduce the buffer leakage-current and effectively suppress Fe diffusion.Entities:
Keywords: 3D growth; Fe doping; GaN power HEMT; MOCVD; diffusion; nano-mask
Year: 2022 PMID: 35329508 PMCID: PMC8955507 DOI: 10.3390/ma15062058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic structures of Fe-doped GaN HEMT: (a) Sample A with Fe concentration 2.31018 cm−3 in the GaN:Fe buffer layer; (b) Sample B is the same as sample A, but with higher Fe concentration 1.31019 cm−3; (c) Sample B′ is the same as Sample B, but without the top layers; (d) Sample B″ is the same as Sample B, but with optimized thickness of GaN:Fe and u-GaN layers; (e) Sample C is the same as Sample A, but with a SiNx nano-mask; and (f) Sample D is the same as Sample A, but with carbon concentration 9.01018 cm−3 in the 500 nm LT GaN buffer layer.
Figure 2In situ reflectance monitoring on the surfaces of Samples A, B, B′, and B″.
Figure 3(a–d) SEM and (e–h) AFM images of the four Samples A, B, B′, and B″.
Dependence of Hall, XRD measurements, and TD densities on different GaN:Fe conditions.
| Sample ID | Sheet Resistance | Sheet Carrier | Mobility (cm2/V·s) | XRD (arcsec) | TD Densities (cm−2) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (002) | (102) | Screw-Type | Edge-Type | ||||
| A | 610 | 6.5 × 1012 | 1580 | 407.4 | 794.8 | 3.34 × 108 | 2.47 × 109 |
| B | 1227 | 5.5 × 1012 | 933 | 403.2 | 700.8 | 3.27 × 108 | 1.75 × 109 |
| B″ | 516 | 7.8 × 1012 | 1556 | 394.2 | 730.2 | 3.12 × 108 | 2.01 × 109 |
Figure 4Fe concentration profile measured by SIMS for four different structures.
Figure 5Vertical leakage current performance of the four samples at room temperatures.