Literature DB >> 35329471

Bioactive Dental Materials: The Current Status.

Gianrico Spagnuolo1.   

Abstract

The field of dental materials has undergone a significant evolution in recent years [...].

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35329471      PMCID: PMC8955510          DOI: 10.3390/ma15062016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


The field of dental materials has undergone a significant evolution in recent years. From restorative and endodontic materials to bioactive agents used for bone reconstruction, the introduction of newer techniques and materials has changed dental practice and treatment planning [1,2,3]. In modern dentistry, there is a great interest in the application of “bioactive” materials for restorative and reconstructive purposes. It must be noted that depending on the application, the perception of what is actually considered “bioactive” differs. In restorative dentistry, the term bioactive usually refers to the ability of a material to form hydroxyapatite crystals on its surface. In implantology, bioactivity concerns the potential of some materials, such as calcium phosphate ceramics and glasses, to provide a direct chemical bond between the implant and the recipient bone. In preventive dentistry, bioactive toothpastes have been employed with the aim to remineralize the outer enamel surface [4]. However, from a biological perspective, bioactive compounds are considered as agents that potentially interact—in a positive way—with living cells and tissues [5]. In endodontics, calcium hydroxide was one of the first materials with bioactive characteristics (introduced in the 1920s) used to promote the formation of a dentinal bridge on exposed pulp tissue [6]. A few decades later, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and its derivates were developed from the basic building material Portland cement, and, now, are commonly used in endodontics. These calcium silicate agents mainly include a mixture of Portland cement with bismuth oxide as an opacifier. The popularity of MTA-based materials in endodontics is due to their hydraulic nature, which confers to them the potential to set in a wet environment, such as root canals. These hydraulic cements, also known as bioceramics, are used for different clinical purposes such as vital pulp capping, perforation repair, apexification, apexogenesis, root canal filling, or as endodontic sealers [7,8]. The bioactivity of calcium silicate materials is a result of their potential to induce the formation of hydroxyapatite crystals on their surface [9]. Since the pH of hydraulic materials is high, phosphate ions from body fluids precipitate with the released calcium ions and form hydroxyapatite on the surface of the bioceramics [10]. Within the field of restorative dentistry, fluoride-releasing restorative material, such as glass ionomer, can be considered to be one of the first bioactive compounds, if we consider adhesion to dental tissues and release of fluoride as basis for bioactivity [11]. However, it should be noted that a bioactive material induces formation of hydroxyapatite on its surface; thus, bioactivity is not an ideal feature of restorative materials. Biomineralization properties of restorations can lead to calcium formation on the surface of dental materials. This aspect may play a positive role in the underlying dental tissue, since bioactive materials would inhibit the action of matrix metalloproteinase enzymes, and improve the hybrid layer. The most common bioactive materials used for restorative dentistry are either based on calcium silicate or calcium aluminate. Calcium silicate-based cements include Biodentine, which presents clinical indications similar to MTA, as well as potential to be used as an intermediate-stress restorative material, temporary restorative material and base/liner. Calcium aluminate restorative materials include direct restorative material and luting cements [12]. Concerning implantology, biaoactive materials have been used as coatings to improve the osseointegration of dental implants and enhance their overall biological performance [12,13]. Dental implants are made from bioinert materials such as stainless steel 316L, commercially pure titanium and its alloy Ti-6Al-4V, and cobalt–chromium alloys [14,15,16]. Different methods can be used to “coat” the surface of dental implants by bioactive materials, including enameling, sol–gel technique, electrophoresis, laser cladding, and thermal spraying. 45S5 Bioglass was the first bioactive glass, developed about 5 decades ago [15]. Other bioactive coatings include hydroxyapatite, zirconium dioxide, titanium dioxide, and zinc oxide. The characteristics of these materials can be further enhanced by adding active agents for different purposes. For instance, addition of silver ions to the bioactive glass structure may improve antibacterial properties [17]. In conclusion, research in the field of dental material is shifting from biocompatibility to bioactivity. In modern dentistry, the ideal dental material is not only biocompatible [18], but also provides biomimetic and bioactive properties. Different bioactive materials can be used in endodontics, restorative dentistry, and implantology and selection of the appropriate material strictly depends on the field of application and its properties.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Bioactive and biomimetic restorative materials: a comprehensive review. Part I.

Authors:  Steven R Jefferies
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.843

Review 2.  Bioactive materials in endodontics.

Authors:  Bénédicte Enkel; Cécile Dupas; Valérie Armengol; Jonas Akpe Adou; Julia Bosco; Guy Daculsi; Alain Jean; Olivier Laboux; Racquel Z LeGeros; Pierre Weiss
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 3.  Bioactive endodontic materials for everyday use: a review.

Authors:  Ryan M Walsh; Jianing He; Jordan Schweitzer; Lynne A Opperman; Karl F Woodmansey
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2018 May-Jun

4.  In vitro cellular detoxification of triethylene glycol dimethacrylate by adduct formation with N-acetylcysteine.

Authors:  Gianrico Spagnuolo; Claudia Desiderio; Virginia Rivieccio; Massimo Amato; Diana Valeria Rossetti; Vincenzo D'Antò; Helmut Schweikl; Alessandro Lupi; Sandro Rengo; Giuseppina Nocca
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Titanium Dental Implant Micro-Morphology.

Authors:  Gaetano Marenzi; Filomena Impero; Fabio Scherillo; Josè Camilla Sammartino; Antonino Squillace; Gianrico Spagnuolo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Tribocorrosion Susceptibility and Mechanical Characteristics of As-Received and Long-Term In-Vivo Aged Nickel-Titanium and Stainless-Steel Archwires.

Authors:  Jasmina Primozic; Miha Hren; Uros Mezeg; Andraz Legat
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Comparative Surface Morphology, Chemical Composition, and Cytocompatibility of Bio-C Repair, Biodentine, and ProRoot MTA on hDPCs.

Authors:  James Ghilotti; José Luis Sanz; Sergio López-García; Julia Guerrero-Gironés; María P Pecci-Lloret; Adrián Lozano; Carmen Llena; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lozano; Leopoldo Forner; Gianrico Spagnuolo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Morpho-Chemical Observations of Human Deciduous Teeth Enamel in Response to Biomimetic Toothpastes Treatment.

Authors:  Maurizio Bossù; Roberto Matassa; Michela Relucenti; Flavia Iaculli; Alessandro Salucci; Gianni Di Giorgio; Giuseppe Familiari; Antonella Polimeni; Stefano Di Carlo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 9.  Bioactive glass coatings on metallic implants for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Joy-Anne N Oliver; Yingchao Su; Xiaonan Lu; Po-Hsuen Kuo; Jincheng Du; Donghui Zhu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2019-10-05
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Strategies of Bioceramics, Bioactive Glasses in Endodontics: Future Perspectives of Restorative Dentistry.

Authors:  S Chitra; Nibin K Mathew; S Jayalakshmi; S Balakumar; S Rajeshkumar; R Ramya
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Long-Term Assessment of Contemporary Ion-Releasing Restorative Dental Materials.

Authors:  Danijela Marovic; Matej Par; Karlo Posavec; Ivana Marić; Dominik Štajdohar; Alen Muradbegović; Tobias T Tauböck; Thomas Attin; Zrinka Tarle
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 3.  Bioactive Inorganic Materials for Dental Applications: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Khalid S Almulhim; Mariam Raza Syed; Norah Alqahtani; Marwah Alamoudi; Maria Khan; Syed Zubairuddin Ahmed; Abdul Samad Khan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 3.748

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.