| Literature DB >> 35329269 |
Andrea Lazo1, Pamela Lazo2, Alejandra Urtubia1, María Gabriela Lobos2, Henrik K Hansen1, Claudia Gutiérrez1.
Abstract
In Chile, there are several abandoned mine tailing impoundments near population centers that need to be remediated. In this study, the ability of Oxalis gigantea, Cistanthe grandiflora, and Puya berteroniana to remove Zn, Ni, and Cr from mine tailings was evaluated. The plants' removal efficiency, bioconcentration, and translocation factors regarding these metals were determined to assess the ability of certain endemic species from Northern and Central Chile to extract or stabilize metals. After a period of seven months, the chemical analysis of plants and tailings, together with the statistical treatment of data, indicated the inability of all the species to translocate Ni, Cr, or Zn with a translocation factor lower than one. The results showed the stabilizing character of Oxalis gigantea, Puya berteroniana, and Cistanthe grandiflora for Zn, with a bioconcentration factor close to 1.2 in all cases, and the same ability of the latter two species for Cr, with a bioconcentration factor of 1.5 in the case of Cistanthe grandiflora and 1.7 for Puya berteroniana. Finally, a removal efficiency of 9.3% was obtained with Cistanthe grandiflora for Cr and 15% for Ni; values lower than 6.4% were obtained for Zn in all cases. Improvements in the process should be sought to enhance the performance of these species for the accumulation of the target metals.Entities:
Keywords: endemic plants; metals; mine tailings
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35329269 PMCID: PMC8955798 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063583
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1(a) Schematic representation of phytoextraction and phytostabilization; (b) experimental setup for phytoremediation pot experiments: five triplicates for each species. From these experiments, the translocation factor, bioconcentration factor, and removal efficiency were calculated.
pH value, granulometric composition, and composition of the tailings.
| Parameter | Value ± Standard Deviation |
|---|---|
| Specific gravity | 2.78 ± 0.25 |
| pH | 7.30 ± 0.10 |
| Solid concentration (weight %) | 82.00 ± 1 |
| Granulometry d50 micrometers | 0.046 ± 0.001 |
| Electric conductivity (dS m−1 at 25 °C) | 32.20 ± 0.10 |
| Cu mg kg−1 dry weight | 1582.22 ± 78.31 |
| Mo mg kg−1 dry weight | 3.86 ± 0.17 |
| Pb mg kg−1 dry weight | 228.15 ± 2.79 |
| Zn mg kg−1 dry weight | 869.80 ± 31.54 |
| Ni mg kg−1 dry weight | 94.64 ± 2.57 |
| Cr mg kg−1 dry weight | 154.63 ± 5.41 |
| Cd mg kg−1 dry weight | Under detection limit |
| Calcium percentage as oxide, CaO% | 9.92 ± 0.32 |
| Magnesium percentage as oxide, MgO% | 5.56 ± 0.27 |
| Manganese percentage as oxide, MnO% | 0.26 ± 0.01 |
| Sodium percentage as oxide, Na2O% | 2.63 ± 0.11 |
| Potassium percentage as oxide, K2O% | 2.24 ± 0.12 |
| Phosphorous percentage as oxide, P2O5% | 0.23 ± 0.01 |
Initial and final concentrations of elements in tailings ± standard deviation.
| Element | Concentration mg kg−1 Dry Weight ± Standard Deviation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Tailings | Final Tailings | |||
|
|
|
| ||
| Zn | 869.80 ± 31.54 | 832.17 ± 32.67 | 828.96 ± 25.67 | 803.88 ± 37.89 |
| Ni | 94.64 ± 2.57 | 87.98 ± 3.32 | 80.93 ± 2.89 | 83.27 ± 4.06 |
| Cr | 154.63 ± 5.41 | 142.79 ± 6.52 | 140.25 ± 5.98 | 141.83 ± 4.87 |
The initial and final concentrations of Cr, Ni, and Zn in the control samples ± standard deviation.
| Element | Concentration mg kg−1 Dry Weight ± Standard Deviation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Cr stems and leaves t = 0 | <d.l | <d.l | <d.l |
| Cr stems and leaves t = tfinal | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | <d.l |
| Cr roots t = 0 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | <d.l | <d.l |
| Cr roots t = tfinal | 0.01 ± 0.00 | <d.l | <d.l |
| Ni stems and leaves t = 0 | 1.85 ± 0.08 | 6.12 ± 0.28 | 5.76 ± 0.08 |
| Ni stems and leaves t = tfinal | 2.01 ± 0.06 | 6.25 ± 0.19 | 6.76 ± 0.12 |
| Ni roots t = 0 | 2.55 ± 0.10 | 4.14 ± 0.52 | 1.97 ± 0.05 |
| Ni roots t = tfinal | 2.85 ± 0.07 | 4.56 ± 0.47 | 1.81 ± 0.05 |
| Zn stems and leaves t = 0 | 13.39 ± 0.45 | 28.79 ± 0.60 | 24.10 ± 0.95 |
| Zn stems and leaves t = tfinal | 13.25 ± 0.55 | 32.55 ± 0.42 | 23.55 ± 0.88 |
| Zn roots t = 0 | 16.82 ± 0.50 | 16.12 ± 0.09 | 17.96 ± 0.88 |
| Zn roots t = tfinal | 17.76 ± 0.61 | 17.65 ± 0.08 | 18.33 ± 0.95 |
The initial concentrations of Cr, Ni, and Zn in plants ± standard deviation.
| Element | Concentration mg kg−1 Dry Weight ± Standard Deviation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Cr stems and leaves | <d.l | <d.l | <d.l |
| Cr roots | 0.14 ± 0.00 | <d.l | <d.l |
| Ni stems and leaves | 1.98 ± 0.09 | 6.32 ± 0.30 | 5.53 ± 0.06 |
| Ni roots | 2.86 ± 0.09 | 3.80 ± 0.45 | 1.97 ± 0.07 |
| Zn stems and leaves | 13.97 ± 0.50 | 28.24 ± 0.65 | 24.75 ± 1.10 |
| Zn roots | 16.79 ± 0.47 | 16.44 ± 0.09 | 18.25 ± 0.90 |
Figure 2Metal content in studied plant species. Values are mean ± standard deviation. (a) Cr in stems and leaves, and roots; (b) Ni in stems and leaves, and roots; (c) Zn in stems and leaves, and roots.
ANOVA and Tukey test results for Cr, Ni, and Zn.
| Cr Stems and Leaves | Sum of Squares |
| Mean Square |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between groups | 9457.54 | 2 | 4728.77 | 1115.96 | 2.34 × 10−14 | 3.89 | |
| Within groups | 50.87 | 12 | 4.24 | ||||
| Total | 9508.41 | 14 | |||||
| mean | Std. error |
| lower | upper | |||
|
|
| 34.62 | 0.92 | 37.60 | 31.15 | 38.10 | <0.05 |
|
|
| 26.71 | 0.92 | 29.01 | 23.24 | 30.19 | <0.05 |
|
|
| 61.34 | 0.92 | 66.62 | 57.86 | 64.81 | <0.05 |
| Cr roots | Sum of groups |
| Mean square |
|
| ||
| Between groups | 39,951.43 | 2 | 19,975.71 | 338.42 | 1.44 × 10−12 | 3.89 | |
| Within groups | 429.27 | 12 | 35.77 | ||||
| Total | 40,380,70 | ||||||
| mean | Std. error |
| lower | upper | |||
|
|
| 90.47 | 2.67 | 33.83 | 80.36 | 100.57 | <0.05 |
|
|
| 121.70 | 2.67 | 45.97 | 111.60 | 131.79 | <0.05 |
|
|
| 31.22 | 2.67 | 11.67 | 21.13 | 41.31 | <0.05 |
| Ni stems and leaves | Sum of squares |
| Mean square |
|
| ||
| Between groups | 411.61 | 2 | 205.81 | 819.49 | 1.47 × 10−34 | 3.89 | |
| Within groups | 3.01 | 12 | 0.25 | ||||
| Total | 14 | ||||||
| Mean | Std. error |
| Lower | Upper | |||
|
|
| 2.75 | 0.22 | 12.27 | 1.90 | 3.60 | <0.05 |
|
|
| 9.48 | 0.22 | 42.30 | 8.63 | 10.32 | <0.05 |
|
|
| 12.23 | 0.22 | 54.57 | 11.38 | 13.07 | <0.05 |
| Ni roots | Sum of squares |
| Mean square |
|
| ||
| Between groups | 4459.05 | 2 | 3229.53 | 1061.87 | 3.15 × 10−14 | 3.89 | |
| Within groups | 36.50 | 12 | 3.04 | ||||
| Total | 6495.55 | 14 | |||||
| Mean | Std. error |
| Lower | Upper | |||
|
|
| 18.21 | 0.78 | 23.36 | 15.27 | 21.16 | <0.05 |
|
|
| 50.20 | 0.78 | 64.37 | 47.26 | 53.14 | <0.05 |
|
|
| 31.99 | 0.78 | 41.01 | 29.04 | 34.93 | <0.05 |
| Zn stems and leaves | Sum of squares |
| Mean square |
|
| ||
| Between groups | 9457.54 | 2 | 4728.77 | 1115.60 | 2.34 × 10−14 | 3.89 | |
| Within groups | 50.86 | 12 | 4.24 | ||||
| Total | 9508.41 | 14 | |||||
| Mean | Std. error |
| Lower | Upper | |||
|
|
| 83.87 | 3.16 | 26.52 | 71.94 | 95.79 | <0.05 |
|
|
| 95.45 | 3.16 | 30.19 | 83.52 | 107.238 | <0.05 |
|
|
| 11.59 | 3.16 | 3.67 | −0.34 | 23.52 | 0.06 |
| Zn roots | Sum of squares |
| Mean square |
|
| ||
| Between groups | 2118.66 | 2 | 1059.33 | 4.41 | 0.04 | 3.89 | |
| Within groups | 2880.03 | 12 | 240.00 | ||||
| Total | 4998.69 | 14 | |||||
| Mean | Std. error |
| Lower | Upper | |||
|
|
| 2.31 | 6.93 | 0.33 | −23.83 | 28.44 | 0.97 |
|
|
| 26.28 | 6.93 | 3.79 | 0.14 | 52.43 | 0.05 |
|
|
| 23.98 | 6.93 | 3.46 | −2.16 | 50.12 | 0.07 |
Figure 3Phytoremediation factors ± standard deviation for Ni, Zn, and Cr in all studied species. (a) Translocation factor; (b) bioconcentration factor.
Figure 4Removal efficiency ± standard deviation for Ni, Zn, and Cr for all studied species.