| Literature DB >> 35329007 |
Shanguang Zhao1, Selina Khoo1, Siew-Cheok Ng2, Aiping Chi3.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the association between complex brain functional networks and the metabolites in urine in subclinical depression. Electroencephalography (EEG) signals were recorded from 78 female college students, including 40 with subclinical depression (ScD) and 38 healthy controls (HC). The phase delay index was utilized to construct functional connectivity networks and quantify the topological properties of brain networks using graph theory. Meanwhile, the urine of all participants was collected for non-targeted LC-MS metabolic analysis to screen differential metabolites. The global efficiency was significantly increased in the α-2, β-1, and β-2 bands, while the characteristic path length of β-1 and β-2 and the clustering coefficient of β-2 were decreased in the ScD group. The severity of depression was negatively correlated with the level of cortisone (p = 0.016, r = -0.40). The metabolic pathways, including phenylalanine metabolism, phenylalanine tyrosine tryptophan biosynthesis, and nitrogen metabolism, were disturbed in the ScD group. The three metabolic pathways were negatively correlated (p = 0.014, r = -0.493) with the global efficiency of the brain network of the β-2 band, whereas they were positively correlated (p = 0.014, r = 0.493) with the characteristic path length of the β-2 band. They were mainly associated with low levels of L-phenylalanine, and the highest correlation sparsity was 0.11. The disturbance of phenylalanine metabolism and the phenylalanine, tryptophan, tyrosine biosynthesis pathways cause depressive symptoms and changes in functional brain networks. The decrease in the L-phenylalanine level may be related to the randomization trend of the β-1 frequency brain functional network.Entities:
Keywords: brain–gut axis; complex brain network; phase lag index; subclinical depression
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35329007 PMCID: PMC8951207 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Demographic information of participants (Mean ± SD).
| Variable | ScD ( | HC ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 18.72 ± 0.36 | 18.51 ± 0.42 |
| Height, cm | 162.71 ± 6.62 | 160.70 ± 6.73 |
| Weight, kg | 52.37 ± 4.72 | 50.00 ± 1.92 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 20.79 ± 2.73 | 19.43 ± 1.61 |
| SDS | 10.57 ± 5.47 | 66.71 ± 5.38 *** |
| BDI-II | 3.46 ± 0.73 | 24.86 ± 2.02 *** |
Note: HC, healthy controls; ScD, subclinical depression; BMI, body mass index; SDS, Self-rating Depression Scale; BDI-Ⅱ, Beck Depression Inventory Ⅱ; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1Differential metabolites (A) and metabolic pathways (B) between ScD and HC groups; Note: FC > 1 means the metabolite is up-regulated in ScD. FC < 1 means the metabolite is down-regulated; 1, nitrogen metabolism; 2, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis; 3, phenylalanine metabolism.
Figure 2Brain network connectivity graphs of ScD and HC groups; on the right is the difference network diagram (red: ScD > HC; blue: ScD < HC); the strength of the connection between the nodes is indicated by the color of the line.
Figure 3Topology properties of brain network based on sparsity threshold (0.05 < S < 0.4); the bar chart represents a comparison after averaging all thresholds with significant differences. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4Correlation between E and L of functional brain network and differential metabolites; × represents a significant correlation. The maximum correlation (red and blue square) was found at the sparsity of 0.11.
Figure 5The relationship between brain function network and peripheral metabolic system.