| Literature DB >> 35328835 |
Karen Araño Tagulao1, Allan B I Bernardo2, Loi Hoi Kei1, Cristina Sousa Coutinho Calheiros1,3.
Abstract
Mangrove forests are one of the most ecologically valuable ecosystems in the world and provide a wide variety of ecosystem services to coastal communities, including cities. Macao, a highly urbanized coastal city located on the southern coast of China west of the Pearl River, is home to several species of mangroves with many associated flora and fauna. Mangrove forests in Macao are vulnerable to threats due to pressure from rapid and massive urban developments in the area, which led to mangrove loss in the past decades. To address this issue, the local authorities established special Ecological Zones for the management of the local mangroves. To reinforce local conservation efforts, educating the local population about the value of mangroves, especially school students, is of utmost importance. To evaluate the impact of environmental education activities on the environmental orientation, knowledge, and values of students toward mangrove conservation in Macao, a quasi-experimental study was undertaken. The effectiveness of a mangroves exhibition and field visit were evaluated using the New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) Scale-Macao version in a group of local school students who participated in the activities. Overall, the results provided consistently positive evaluations of the impact of the environmental education program. The strongest improvements were found in the students' pro-environmental orientations, knowledge about mangroves, and value for environmental protection.Entities:
Keywords: NEP-New Ecological Paradigm; conservation; environmental orientation; environmental protection; urban mangroves
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35328835 PMCID: PMC8954131 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063147
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Students viewing the mangroves-related materials at the exhibition gallery.
Figure 2Guided visit to the local mangrove site.
Revised New Ecological Paradigm Scale—Macao Version (adapted from [26]).
| 1. We are approaching the limit of the number of people the earth can support. |
| 2. Humans have the right to modify the mangrove environment to suit their needs. |
| 3. When humans interfere with mangroves, it often produces disastrous consequences. |
| 4. Human ingenuity will ensure that we do not make the earth unlivable. |
| 5. Humans are severely abusing the mangroves. |
| 6. The mangrove ecosystem has plenty of natural resources if we just learn how to develop them. |
| 7. Plants and animals in mangroves have as much right as humans to exist. |
| 8. The balance of nature in the mangrove ecosystem is strong enough to cope with the impacts of modern industrial nations. |
| 9. Despite our special abilities, humans are still subject to the laws of nature. |
| 10. The mangrove crisis has been greatly exaggerated. |
| 11. The earth is like a spaceship with very limited room and resources. |
| 12. Humans were meant to rule over the rest of nature. |
| 13. The balance of nature in mangroves is very delicate and easily upset. |
| 14. Humans will eventually learn enough about how nature works to be able to control it. |
| 15. If things continue on their present course, we will soon experience a major environmental catastrophe. |
Items on knowledge and attitudes.
| Knowledge and Attitudes Dimension | Items |
|---|---|
| Environmental knowledge | I already know about mangroves. |
| Exhibition knowledge | Exhibition visits help me understand more about mangroves. |
| Environmental connection | I feel more connected with nature when classes are held in outdoor spaces. |
| Environmental value | Wetlands, like mangroves, are important for coastal cities like Macao. |
| Environmental protection | Mangroves should be protected and conserved. |
Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents.
| Description | Categories | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 45 |
| Female | 38 | |
| Age (years) | 12 | 18 |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| Grade Level | 7 | 18 |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 9 |
Summary of descriptive statistics for NEP-Macao items (n = 78).
| Pre-Test | Post-Test | Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measure |
|
| Skewness | Kurtosis |
|
| Skewness | Kurtosis | |
| NEP-Macao (complete scale) | 3.589 | 0.365 | 0.225 | −0.380 | 3.91 | 0.29 | 0.067 | −0.161 | 0.321 |
| NEP Item 1 | 3.744 | 0.797 | −0.292 | −0.228 | 4.154 | 0.722 | −1.728 | 5.878 | 0.041 |
| NEP Item 2 | 2.923 | 1.003 | 0.316 | −0.648 | 3.295 | 1.186 | −0.646 | −0.923 | 0.372 |
| NEP Item 3 | 3.769 | 0.719 | 0.378 | −0.982 | 4.321 | 0.497 | 0.454 | −1.014 | 0.552 |
| NEP Item 5 | 3.641 | 0.805 | −0.321 | 0.549 | 4.026 | 0.789 | −1.022 | 1.357 | 0.385 |
| NEP Item 7 | 4.077 | 0.864 | −0.894 | 1.035 | 4.577 | 0.57 | −1.388 | 3.376 | 0.5 |
| NEP Item 9 | 3.936 | 0.671 | −0.190 | −0.003 | 4.167 | 0.59 | −0.439 | 1.618 | 0.231 |
| NEP Item 11 | 3.859 | 0.936 | −0.589 | −0.404 | 4.154 | 0.927 | −1.319 | 1.655 | 0.259 |
| NEP Item 12 | 3.564 | 1.135 | −0.327 | −0.924 | 3.769 | 1.127 | −0.868 | −0.126 | 0.205 |
| NEP Item 13 | 3.449 | 0.696 | 0.069 | −0.149 | 3.782 | 0.595 | 0.104 | −0.385 | 0.333 |
| NEP Item 14 | 2.59 | 0.904 | 0.7 | −0.048 | 2.551 | 0.935 | 0.63 | −0.108 | −0.039 |
| NEP Item 15 | 3.923 | 0.923 | −0.659 | 0.207 | 4.256 | 0.612 | −0.553 | 1.277 | 0.333 |
Summary of descriptive statistics for environmental knowledge and beliefs (n = 78).
| Pre-Test | Post-Test | Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measure |
|
| Skewness | Kurtosis |
|
| Skewness | Kurtosis | |
| Environmental knowledge | 2.885 | 1.006 | −0.234 | −0.594 | 3.897 | 0.847 | −2.174 | 5.735 | 1.012 |
| Exhibition knowledge | 3.949 | 0.754 | −0.101 | −0.749 | 4.513 | 0.528 | −0.323 | −1.311 | 0.564 |
| Environmental connection | 3.769 | 0.896 | −0.856 | 1.131 | 4.154 | 0.994 | −1.781 | 3.482 | 0.385 |
| Environmental value | 3.692 | 0.708 | 0.072 | −0.345 | 4.449 | 0.501 | 0.21 | −2.008 | 0.757 |
| Environmental protection | 4.308 | 0.726 | −0.757 | 0.059 | 4.654 | 0.505 | −0.967 | −0.363 | 0.346 |
Survey Questionnaire.
| Age: | ||||
| Gender: | ||||
| Grade Level: | ||||
| 1. We are approaching the limit of the number of people the earth can support. | ||||
| 2. Humans have the right to modify the mangrove environment to suit their needs. | ||||
| 3. When humans interfere with mangroves, it often produces disastrous consequences. | ||||
| 4. Human ingenuity will ensure that we do not make the earth unlivable. | ||||
| 5. Humans are severely abusing the mangroves. | ||||
| 6. The mangrove ecosystem has plenty of natural resources if we just learn how to develop them. | ||||
| 7. Plants and animals in mangroves have as much right as humans to exist. | ||||
| 8. The balance of nature in the mangrove ecosystem is strong enough to cope with the impacts of modern industrial nations. | ||||
| 9. Despite our special abilities, humans are still subject to the laws of nature. | ||||
| 10. The mangrove crisis has been greatly exaggerated. | ||||
| 11. The earth is like a spaceship with very limited room and resources. | ||||
| 12. Humans were meant to rule over the rest of nature. | ||||
| 13. The balance of nature in mangroves is very delicate and easily upset. | ||||
| 14. Humans will eventually learn enough about how nature works to be able to control it. | ||||
| 15. If things continue on their present course, we will soon experience a major environmental catastrophe. | ||||
| 16. I already know about mangroves. | ||||
| 17. Exhibition visits help me understand more about mangroves. | ||||
| 18. I feel more connected with nature when classes are held in outdoor spaces. | ||||
| 19. Wetlands, like mangroves, are important for coastal cities like Macao. | ||||
| 20. Mangroves should be protected and conserved. | ||||