Literature DB >> 3532883

Do physicians need objective measurements to diagnose asthma?

E Adelroth, F E Hargreave, E H Ramsdale.   

Abstract

The frequency with which disagreement occurs between the clinician's diagnosis of asthma and the objective measurement of methacholine airway responsiveness is not known. We have examined this in 51 consecutive new adult patients presenting with symptoms consistent with asthma but with normal spirometry. Disagreement between the physician's assessment and the result of the methacholine test occurred in 20 patients (39%). Of these, 13 had a clinical diagnosis of asthma but normal responsiveness and 7 had an unexpected increase in methacholine responsiveness. There was no difference in the type of symptoms experienced whether or not there was agreement between the test and the physician's assessment. Thus, an objective measurement like a methacholine inhalation test is clinically useful when spirometry is normal. A normal methacholine test in the presence of symptoms suggestive of asthma should alert the physician to the need for further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3532883     DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1986.134.4.704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  9 in total

1.  Non-sensitising air pollution at workplaces and adult onset asthma.

Authors:  U Flodin; P Jönsson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Does the methacholine test reproduce symptoms?

Authors:  Marianne Lévesque; Heberto Ghezzo; Jocelyne L'Archevêque; Jean-Luc Malo
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 3.  Diagnostic and therapeutic value of airway challenges in asthma.

Authors:  Donald W Cockcroft; Beth E Davis
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 4.  The natural history of bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Authors:  J B Clough; S T Holgate
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1989

Review 5.  Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma Consensus Group.

Authors:  L P Boulet; A Becker; D Bérubé; R Beveridge; P Ernst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-11-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Screening for asthma in children.

Authors:  A Jones
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Factors affecting peak expiratory flow variability and bronchial reactivity in a random population sample.

Authors:  B G Higgins; J R Britton; S Chinn; K K Lai; P G Burney; A E Tattersfield
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Exacerbations of asthma without sputum eosinophilia.

Authors:  M O Turner; P Hussack; M R Sears; J Dolovich; F E Hargreave
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness of cell counts in blown nasal secretions.

Authors:  Parameswaran Nair; Sarah Goodwin; Frederick E Hargreave
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2011-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.