| Literature DB >> 35328245 |
Jiun-Lin Yan1,2, Yao-Lian Chen3, Moa-Yu Chen1, Bo-An Chen4, Jiung-Xian Chang5, Ching-Chung Kao5, Meng-Chi Hsieh5, Yi-Ting Peng5, Kuan-Chieh Huang5, Pin-Yuan Chen1.
Abstract
A midline shift (MLS) is an important clinical indicator for intracranial hemorrhage. In this study, we proposed a robust, fully automatic neural network-based model for the detection of MLS and compared it with MLSs drawn by clinicians; we also evaluated the clinical applications of the fully automatic model. We recruited 300 consecutive non-contrast CT scans consisting of 7269 slices in this study. Six different types of hemorrhage were included. The automatic detection of MLS was based on modified Keypoint R-CNN with keypoint detection followed by training on the ResNet-FPN-50 backbone. The results were further compared with manually drawn outcomes and manually defined keypoint calculations. Clinical parameters, including Glasgow coma scale (GCS), Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), and 30-day mortality, were also analyzed. The mean absolute error for the automatic detection of an MLS was 0.936 mm compared with the ground truth. The interclass correlation was 0.9899 between the automatic method and MLS drawn by different clinicians. There was high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of MLS at 2 mm (91.7%, 80%) and 5 mm (87.5%, 96.7%) and MLSs greater than 10 mm (85.7%, 97.7%). MLS showed a significant association with initial poor GCS and GCS on day 7 and was inversely correlated with poor 30-day GOS (p < 0.001). In conclusion, automatic detection and calculation of MLS can provide an accurate, robust method for MLS measurement that is clinically comparable to the manually drawn method.Entities:
Keywords: CT; automatic detection; intracranial hemorrhage; midline shift
Year: 2022 PMID: 35328245 PMCID: PMC8947005 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030693
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1Figure 1 shows the method for manually drawing the midline shift (A). Firstly. identify the midline of the brain (yellow line), then measure the distance perpendicular to the septum pellucidum (red line). The manually selected keypoints were defined as shown in (B), including the anterior-most point of the anterior falx (C), the posterior-most point of the posterior falx (D), and the endpoints of the septum pellucidum (E,F). The MLS was calculated by measuring the distance between the middle point of line AD and line BC.
Figure 2The architecture of Keypoint R-CNN. The Kepoint R-CNN contains ResNet-FPN-50 as a backbone, a region proposal network as a ROI generator, and three heads to realize the automatic detection of MLS.
General Characteristics.
| Total Number | 300 | |
| CT scan (slices) | 7269 | |
| Age (mean ± SD, range) | 48.1 ± 15.1 | |
| Types of hemorrhage * | ICH | 153 |
| Acute SDH | 90 | |
| Chronic SDH | 55 | |
| EDH | 5 | |
| IVH | 53 | |
| SAH | 115 | |
| Surgical cases | 93 | |
| ICP insertion | 61 | |
| Initial GCS | 3–8 | 67 |
| 9–13 | 74 | |
| 14–15 | 159 | |
| GCS day 7 | 3–8 | 60 |
| 9–13 | 60 | |
| 14–15 | 172 | |
| GOS score day 30 | 1 | 44 |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 69 | |
| 4 | 141 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| Positive pupil reflex, initial | Right (+/−) | 244/36 |
| Left (+/−) | 245/41 | |
| ICP, day 0 (cmH2O, mean ± SD, range) | 18.1 ± 7.9, 0–30 | |
| ICP, day 3 (cmH2O, mean ± SD, range) | 8.9 ± 9.3, 0–70 | |
* Patients may have mixed types of hemorrhage at the same time.
Cause of Intracranial Hemorrhage.
| Cause of Intracranial Hemoprrhage | ||
|---|---|---|
| Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage | 153 | |
| Trauma | 43 | |
| Spontaneous | 80 | |
| Secondary * | 21 | |
| Postoperative | 9 | |
| Acute Subdural hematoma (ASDH) | 90 | |
| Trauma | 68 | |
| Secondary * | 18 | |
| Postoperative | 4 | |
| Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) | 115 | |
| Traumatic | 72 | |
| Nontraumatic ** | 43 | |
| Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) | 55 | |
| Traumatic | 43 | |
| Nontraumatic *** | 12 | |
| Epidural hemorrhage | 5 | |
| Intraventricular hemorrhage | 53 | |
* Secondary causes of hemorrhage included neoplasm, infarction with hemorrhagic transformation, and vascular lesions; ** Nontraumatic SAH included, spontaneous ICH associate SAH, vascular lesion, tumor bleeding, and postoperative changes; *** Nontraumatic CSDH indicated those without clear trauma history.
Different methods for midline shift measurement.
| MLS MA * | MLS R * | MLS RA * | MLS GT # | MLS Predict # | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slices | 300 | 300 | 300 | 6456 | 7570 |
| Mean (mm) | 3.387 | 3.683 | 3.639 | 3.383 | 3.384 |
| Median | 1.300 | 0.0 | 2.000 | 1.490 | 1.520 |
| Max | 29.00 | 32.00 | 29.10 | 25.43 | 24.49 |
| Min | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.166 | 0.1987 |
| SD | 5.154 | 5.752 | 5.224 | 4.670 | 4.512 |
| Mean of MAE + | 0.213 | 0.936 | |||
| Max of MAE | 6.227 | 6.038 | |||
| CI95 Diff | 2.819–3.955 | 3.050–4.317 | 3.062–4.216 | 2.854–3.913 | 2.872–3.897 |
No significant difference was observed between different methods for the calculation of the midline shift. * Manually selected the most representative slice from each patient by the attending neurosurgeon (MLS MA), by the resident doctor (MLS R), and by a research associate (MLS RA). # MLS GT was the results of keypoint calculation, and MLS Predict was calculated by the automatic MLS detection method; + MAE: mean absolute of error was compared with that of the manual measurement made by the attending surgeon.
Sensitivity and specificity for detection of midline shift.
| Threshold (mm) | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Train | 2 | 89.7% | 72.7% |
| Valid | 2 | 87.5% | 85.7% |
| Test | 2 | 91.7% | 80.0% |
| Train | 5 | 94.0% | 96.5% |
| Valid | 5 | 94.1% | 92.9% |
| Test | 5 | 87.5% | 96.7% |
| Train | 10 | 84.6% | 98.5% |
| Valid | 10 | 83.3% | 96.0% |
| Test | 10 | 85.7% | 97.4% |
Figure 3Figure 3 shows the midline shift measured by different methods in different patients with various initial GCSs (A) and GCS on day 7 (B). The MLS_MA indicates that the MLS was manually measured. MLS_GT represents the MLS measured by the calculation from the automated defined keypoints. MLS_pred is the MLS measurement generated by using the automated detection method. GCS 3–8 (orange), 9–12 (green), and 13–15 (purple) indicates the degree of coma scale in different patients. The MLS was inversely correlated to the coma scale score.
Figure 4Figure 4 shows the midline shift measured by different methods in different patients with various 30 days Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). The MLS was inversely correlated to the GOS in all three different measurements (MLS_Yan: manual measurement; MLS_GT: calculated from keypoint detection; MLS_pred: automated MLS detection).
Figure 5Figure 5 shows the receiver operation curve of MLS measurement by using manual drawing, key point detection and automatic detection methods for the prediction of 30-day mortality and initial and day 7 severe GCS (GCS < 9). There was no difference between different methods.