| Literature DB >> 35327310 |
Xingang Xu1, Tianyuan Zhao1, Jianing Ma1, Qi Song1, Qiao Wei2, Weihong Sun1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two-stage variable temperature drying (VTD) on the quality and drying efficiency of paddy rice in the hot air-drying process. A constant temperature of 50 °C (CTD) was used as a control group. VTD and CTD methods were applied in a 15 ton batch type recirculating grain dryer. Three aspects (appearance quality, physical and chemical properties, taste quality) of the paddy rice samples from the dryer were measured and compared. It was observed that paddy rice with an initial moisture content of 25.3% (wet basis) was dried to 14% (wet basis). Compared to CTD, the VTD method could reduce the drying time and fissuring rate by 0.7 h and 42%, respectively. It had a head rice yield (HRY) of 78.45%, compared to 76.45% by CTD. The fatty acid content of the VTD samples was 2.28% lower than those of CTD, and it exhibited a 34% decrease in amylose content. These results show that two-stage VTD is an advanced hot air-drying method that can be used to improve the quality of dried paddy rice, maintain efficiency, and reduce the cost of the drying process by minimizing the rate of energy consumption.Entities:
Keywords: drying; moisture content; paddy rice; variable temperature
Year: 2022 PMID: 35327310 PMCID: PMC8949603 DOI: 10.3390/foods11060888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Independent variables and actual levels used in single factor experiment design.
| Level | Temperature of First Stage (°C) | Temperature of Second Stage (°C) | Drying Time (min) | Tempering Time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 75 | 40 | 12 | 60 |
| 2 | 70 | 45 | 14 | 70 |
| 3 | 65 | 50 | 16 | 80 |
| 4 | 60 | 55 | 18 | 90 |
| 5 | 55 | 60 | 20 | 100 |
Figure 1The scheme of the 15 ton batch type recirculating grain dryer: (1) the tempering section; (2) the drying section. Subfigures come from 5HXJ grain dryer instructions.
The dimensions of the 15 ton batch type recirculating grain dryer.
| Model | Weight of Dryer (kg) | Length, Width and Height (mm) | The Power of the Dryer (kw) | Capacity(kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5HXJ-15 | 3420 | 3575 × 2990 × 11,595 | 9.04 | Paddy rice: 2800–15,000 |
| Wheat: 3400–18,200 |
Figure 2The single factor experiments results. (a) the head rice yield of the paddy rice in the first stage, the moisture content of rice samples was 23% ± 0.1%, (b) the head rice yield of the paddy rice in the second stage, the moisture content of rice samples was 18% ± 0.1%, (c) the head rice yield of the paddy rice at different drying time.
Factors and their coded and actual levels used in response surface methodology.
| Level | A, Temperature of First Stage (°C) | B, Temperature of Second Stage (°C) | C, Drying Time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65 | 50 | 12 |
| 0 | 60 | 45 | 14 |
| −1 | 55 | 40 | 16 |
The results of response surface methodology.
| Response | Equation from the RSM | R-Squared | Adj R-Squared | Pred R-Squared | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| = 70 − 2.19A − 1.7B − 1.22C − 1.05AB − 1.16AC − 0.1BC | <0.0001 | 0.9623 | 0.9367 | 0.8971 |
| Total Drying Time | = 11.58 − 0.91A − 1.96B − 0.4C + 0.2AB + 0.025AC + 0.13BC + 0.73A2 − 0.12B2 + 1.11C2 | <0.0001 | 0.9856 | 0.9670 | 0.7898 |
Comparison of four hot air-drying methods.
| Drying Method | Drying Temperature (°C) | Cycle Speed (Hz) | Initial Moisture Content (%) | Final | Drying Time (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTD | 50 | 50 | 25 ± 0.3 | 14.0 ± 0.5 | 14.2 ± 0.2 a |
| 30 | 29 ± 0.5 | 14.0 ± 0.5 | 14.7 ± 0.4 a | ||
| VTD | 60, 45 | 50 | 25 ± 0.3 | 14.0 ± 0.5 | 13.5 ± 0.2 b |
| 30 | 29 ± 0.5 | 14.0 ± 0.5 | 14.5 ± 0.2 a |
Values expressed as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). According to Duncan’s multiple range test, different superscript letters in the last column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Quality indicators for the appearance of rice under different drying methods: (a) the husked rice yield of the paddy rice dried at VTD and CTD; (b) the fissuring rate of the paddy rice dried at VTD and CTD; (c) the head rice yield of the paddy rice dried at VTD and CTD; (d) total color difference value (ΔE) of the paddy rice dried at VTD and CTD.
Chemical indicators of the paddy rice.
| Test | Crude Fat (%) | Fat Acidity (mg KOH/100 g) | Amylose Content (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| VTD | 1.67 ± 0.21 | 16.73 ± 0.52 | 12.35 ± 0.13 ** |
| CTD | 1.66 ± 0.31 | 17.12 ± 0.35 | 18.67 ± 0.06 |
Values expressed as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). According to the independent sample t-test, ** indicated groups within one column differ significantly at p < 0.01.
Figure 4SEM of starch extracted from paddy rice under 50 Hz CTD and 50 Hz VTD: (a,b) 50 Hz CTD; (c,d) 50 Hz VTD.
Figure 5RVA profiles of two samples.
Comparison of the RVA profiles.
| Test | Peak | Minimum Viscosity | Breakdown | Final | Setback | Peak Time | Pasting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTD | 2550 ± 82 ** | 1091 ± 24 ** | 1459 ± 74 | 1653 ± 27 ** | 562 ± 14 ** | 5.37 ± 0.08 ** | 72.6 ± 0.9 |
| CTD | 2971 ± 83 | 1567 ± 78 | 1404 ± 79 | 2203 ± 78 | 636 ± 6 | 5.75 ± 0.10 | 71.9 ± 0.4 |
Values expressed as the mean ± standard error (n = 5). According to the independent sample t-test, ** indicated groups within one column differ significantly at p < 0.01.
Figure 6The sensory qualities of cooked rice.
Textural features of cooked rice.
| Drying Method | Hardness (g) | Adhesiveness (g s) | Springiness (%) | Gumminess (g) | Chewiness (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTD | 1929.9 ± 78.5 | −203.2 ± 102.3 | 88.9 ± 3.3 | 916.5 ± 105.7 | 812.9 ± 69.8 |
| VTD | 1619.9 ± 71.3 ** | −291.3 ± 107.7 | 89.9 ± 0.5 | 853.9 ± 40.0 | 767.3 ± 39.3 |
Values expressed as the mean ± standard error (n = 5). According to the independent sample t test, ** indicated groups within one column differ significantly at p < 0.01.