| Literature DB >> 35327201 |
Brisa Del Mar Torres-Martínez1, Rey David Vargas-Sánchez1,2, Gastón Ramón Torrescano-Urrutia1, Martin Esqueda1, Javier Germán Rodríguez-Carpena3, Juana Fernández-López4, Jose Angel Perez-Alvarez4, Armida Sánchez-Escalante1.
Abstract
Edible mushrooms are considered an important source of nutritional and bioactive compounds. In this review, the findings of macronutrients, bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, and antimicrobials against foodborne pathogens of some Pleurotus spp., as well as their potential use as an ingredient in the meat industry are discussed. The results show that Pleurotus spp. are an important source of proteins and amino acids, carbohydrates, minerals, and vitamins. Additionally, the presence of some bioactive components, such as polysaccharides (α-glucans, β-glucans, and so on), proteins/enzymes and peptides (eryngin, pleurostrin, and others) phenolic acids (p-coumaric, chlorogenic, cinnamic, ferulic, gallic, protocatechuic, and others) and flavonoids (chrysin, naringenin, myricetin, quercetin, rutin, or the like) has been demonstrated. Several works evidenced the use of Pleurotus spp. in some meat and meat products (patties, sausages, paste, and suchlike) as a novel ingredient in order to improve their chemical composition and functional health promoting properties, as well as to increase their physicochemical and sensory attributes. In conclusion, the use of Pleurotus is a promissory strategy for the development of natural additives rich in nutritional and bioactive components for meat and meat product formulation.Entities:
Keywords: bioactive compounds; chemical composition; edible mushrooms; meat products
Year: 2022 PMID: 35327201 PMCID: PMC8954082 DOI: 10.3390/foods11060779
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Taxonomic description and fruit bodies of Pleurotus ostreatus.
Proximate composition (% dry matter) of some Pleurotus species.
| Species | Protein | Fat | Ash | Carbohydrates | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 85.9 | [ |
|
| 11.0 | 1.5 | 6.2 | 81.4 | [ |
|
| 23.2 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 50.1 | [ |
|
| 26.34 | 3.67 | 10.37 | 38.17 | [ |
|
| 20.56 | 4.3 | 9.02 | 42.83 | [ |
Phenolic components identified in some Pleurotus spp.
| Specie | Compound | References |
|---|---|---|
| Phenolic acids: gallic, protocatechuic, cinnamic, | [ | |
| Phenolic acids: chlorogenic, syringic, ferulic, cinnamic, | [ | |
|
| Phenolic acids: gallic, homonogentisic, protocatechuic, chlorogenic, vanillic | [ |
| Phenolic acids: gallic, caffeic, vanillic, | [ | |
|
| Phenolic acids: 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic, chlorogenic, syringic, ferulic, cinnamic, | [ |
| Phenolic acids: chlorogenic, | [ | |
| Flavonoids: rutin | [ | |
|
| Phenolic acids: cinnamic | [ |
Pleurotus spp. enhanced meat products quality.
| Meat Product | Mushroom | Relevant Results | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chicken patties | Decreased lightness, yellowness, hardness, and chewiness while increase springiness | [ | |
| Low fat content without threatening sensorial properties | [ | ||
| Highest antioxidant activity | [ | ||
| Reduction of fat, increased the ash content, no difference recorded in sensory attributes | [ | ||
| Lower costs of production, enhancement of nutritional composition | [ | ||
| Chicken nugget | Higher lightness, chewiness, springiness, water activity, and moisture | [ | |
| Chicken sausage | Increased moisture and fiber but reduced the ash content, crude fat, and crude protein | [ | |
| The addition improves the taste and texture | [ | ||
| Higher nutritional composition: increment total dietary fiber, low fat content, and β-glucan except for protein | [ | ||
| Beef brain sausage | 50:50 treatment presents the best characteristics and preference in organoleptic test | [ | |
| Beef patties | Lowest reduction in diameter, thickness, and weight loss duringcooking, besides improved flavor, juiciness, tenderness, and acceptance. | [ | |
| Reduce fat and sodium content besides cooking loss, hardness, and gumminess | [ | ||
| Decreased fat content | [ | ||
| No significant differences in terms of appearance, aroma, taste, and texture in comparison with control | [ | ||
| Beef and chicken patties | Improved protein efficiency ratio | [ | |
| Pork sausages | Reduced fat and energy contents, while protein, moisture, total dietary fiber, cooking loss, and water holding capacity increased | [ | |
| Frankfurter sausages | Fiber contents were improved as well as texture | [ | |
| Beef Meatballs | Higher protein, fat, better protein while lower cooking losses | [ | |
| It matched the physical properties to control treatment (100% meat) | [ | ||
| Enhanced the organoleptic characteristics and reduced the fat content | [ | ||
| Improved the chewiness | [ | ||
| Salami | Prevent lipid and protein oxidation | [ | |
| Beef paste | Reduce the hardness, chewiness, and gumminess. The amino acids content and flavor component were enhanced | [ | |
| Abon Quail shredded meat | Reduce price and texture of quail, also increased moisture, and decreased | [ |