| Literature DB >> 35326600 |
Kazuhide Shimizu1,2, Kaoru Tamura1, Shoko Hara1,3, Motoki Inaji1,3, Yoji Tanaka1, Daisuke Kobayashi4, Takashi Sugawara1, Hiroaki Wakimoto2, Tadashi Nariai1,3, Kenji Ishii3, Ichiro Sakuma5, Taketoshi Maehara1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is widely employed to assist fluorescence-guided surgery for malignant brain tumors. Positron emission tomography with 11C-methionine (MET-PET) represents the activity of brain tumors with precise boundaries but is not readily available. We hypothesized that quantitative 5-ALA-induced fluorescence intensity might correlate with MET-PET uptake in gliomas.Entities:
Keywords: 5-ALA; 5-aminolevulinic acid; MET-PET; glioblastoma; glioma
Year: 2022 PMID: 35326600 PMCID: PMC8946621 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061449
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Patient Characteristics.
| Case Number | Age (Years) | Sex | Localization | Histology | WHO Grade | Tumor Status | IDH-1 | Ki67 | Gd Enhancement | AED | Fluorescence Intesnsity | Met SUV | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T/N | Tumor | Normal | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 54 | M | Parietal | GBM | IV | Recurrent | Wild type | 23.5 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Strong | 2.83 | 5.72 | 2.02 |
| 2 | 78 | F | Temporal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 18.9 | Ring/Solid | None | Strong | 3.82 | 4.96 | 1.3 |
| 3 | 59 | M | Temporal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 27.4 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Strong | 4.78 | 6.84 | 1.43 |
| 4 | 67 | F | Temporal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 43.4 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Strong | 4.66 | 8.44 | 1.81 |
| 5 | 78 | M | Frontal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 82.8 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Strong | 3.05 | 4.48 | 1.47 |
| 6 | 37 | F | Frontal | GBM | IV | Recurrent | Mutant | 35.4 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Strong | 2.51 | 6.7 | 2.67 |
| 7 | 65 | M | Temporal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 18.9 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Strong | 3.65 | 4.02 | 1.1 |
| 8 | 67 | F | Temporal | GBM | IV | Recurrent | Wild type | 43.8 | Ring/Solid | None | Strong | 1.51 | 2.71 | 1.8 |
| 9 | 53 | M | Temporal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 30.9 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Strong | 2.95 | 4.04 | 1.37 |
| 10 | 72 | F | Frontal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 24.2 | Ring/Solid | NA | Strong | 4 | 8.15 | 2.04 |
| 11 | 38 | F | Frontal | GBM | IV | Recurrent | Mutant | 48 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Strong | 4.04 | 9.65 | 2.39 |
| 12 | 70 | M | Temporal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 16.9 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Strong | 4.91 | 7.42 | 1.51 |
| 13 | 26 | M | Parietal | GBM | IV | Recurrent | Unknown | NA | Ring/Solid | None | Strong | 2.8 | 4.79 | 1.71 |
| 14 | 72 | F | Parietal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 39.5 | None/Slight | None | Strong | 1.6 | 3.27 | 2.04 |
| 15 | 77 | M | Frontal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 23.6 | Ring/Solid | Others | Strong | 3.82 | 5.46 | 1.43 |
| 16 | 81 | F | Frontal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 32.5 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Strong | 2.75 | 5.67 | 2.06 |
| 17 | 69 | M | Frontal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 45 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Strong | 3.66 | 8.09 | 2.21 |
| 18 | 46 | M | Temporal | GBM | IV | New | Wild type | 28.6 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Strong | 3.84 | 6.45 | 1.68 |
| 19 | 52 | F | Temporal | AA | III | New | Mutant | 9.8 | None/Slight | None | Weak | 1.93 | 3.24 | 1.68 |
| 20 | 54 | M | Parietal | AA | III | Recurrent | Mutant | 4.7 | None/Slight | LEV | Weak | 2.22 | 1.71 | 0.77 |
| 21 | 23 | M | Temporal | AA | III | New | Wild type | 16.2 | None/Slight | LEV | None | 1.82 | 2.35 | 1.29 |
| 22 | 44 | F | Frontal | AA | III | New | Mutant | 14 | None/Slight | LEV | None | 2.57 | 4.65 | 1.81 |
| 23 | 23 | F | Frontal | AA | III | New | Wild type | 8.4 | None/Slight | LEV | Weak | 2.01 | 2.87 | 1.43 |
| 24 | 40 | F | Frontal | AA | III | New | Wild type | 18.5 | Ring/Solid | LEV | Moderate | 3.77 | 7.43 | 1.97 |
| 25 | 58 | M | Frontal | AA | III | New | Mutant | 5.2 | None/Slight | LEV | Strong | 1.87 | 3.99 | 2.13 |
| 26 | 33 | M | Insula | AA | III | Recurrent | Mutant | 21.3 | None/Slight | LEV | Strong | 2.84 | 5.4 | 1.9 |
| 27 | 33 | M | Insula | AA | III | Recurrent | Mutant | 15.2 | None/Slight | LEV | Strong | 3.04 | 7.23 | 2.38 |
| 28 | 43 | M | Frontal | AA | III | New | Mutant | 12.9 | None/Slight | LEV | Strong | 2.32 | 3.78 | 1.63 |
| 29 | 31 | M | Insula | DA | II | New | Mutant | 3.3 | None/Slight | LEV | None | 2.07 | 3.72 | 1.8 |
| 30 | 77 | F | Temporal | DA | II | New | Wild type | 1 | None/Slight | None | Moderate | 2.19 | 3.96 | 1.81 |
| 31 | 37 | F | Insula | DA | II | Recurrent | Mutant | 5.8 | None/Slight | LEV | Moderate | 1.52 | 2.47 | 1.63 |
| 32 | 42 | M | Temporal | DA | II | New | Mutant | 5.1 | None/Slight | LEV | None | 2.02 | 4.96 | 2.46 |
AA, Anaplastic Astrocytoma; DA, Diffuse Astrocytoma; GBM, Glioblastoma; NA; Not Available; Gd, Gadolinium; AED, Antiepileptic drug; LEV, levetiracetam.
Figure 1Quantification of intraoperative 5-ALA-induced fluorescence intensity from resected tumor samples.
Figure 2Illustrative cases. (a) A 67-year-old female with a newly diagnosed tumor in the left temporal lobe. Preoperative imaging showed ring enhancement on T1Gd MRI and high uptake on MET-PET. The SUV max (T/N ratio) of the MET-PET scan was 4.66. Bright red 5-ALA-induced fluorescence from the surgical specimen was captured and the intensity was detected by the quantification system. The peak at 635 nm was scaled out of the measurement range. There is a second peak of around 700 nm. This peak became apparent due to the high signals and was consistent with previous studies in which this second peak was noted [36]. Histopathological analysis revealed high cellularity with microvascular proliferation in hematoxylin and eosin-stained section. Immunohistochemistry with Ki-67 labeling showed abundant proliferating tumor cells with 43.4% positivity. The final diagnosis was Glioblastoma, IDH wild type. (b) A 44-year-old female with a newly diagnosed tumor in the left frontal lobe. In the preoperative imaging, the tumor showed no enhancement on MRI, while the SUV max (T/N ratio) of the MET-PET scan was only mildly elevated (2.57). Repeated scanning of the tumor specimens failed to detect 5-ALA-induced fluorescence. Histopathology revealed densely proliferating tumor cells with Ki-67 index of 14.0%, without evidence of microvascular proliferation or necrosis. The final diagnosis was Anaplastic astrocytoma, IDH mutant.
Figure 3Relationships between MET-PET uptake and Ki-67 index versus quantified 5-ALA-induced fluorescence intensity. (a,b) Comparison between 4 fluorescence intensity groups. Both MET-PET (a) and Ki-67 index (b) were the highest in the strong fluorescence group. The one way ANOVA test revealed that the means of the 4 groups are not equal for both Ki-67 index and MET-PET uptake. However, the Tukey method’s posthoc analysis found no statistical significance in any pair. (c,d) Comparison of two fluorescence intensity groups rearranged based on signal visibility, Visible (including Strong and Moderate groups) or Non-visible (Weak and None), for MET-PET uptake (c) and Ki-67 index (d). Unpaired t tests were significant for MET-PET uptake (c, p < 0.001) and Ki-67 (d, 0.0091). The data are shown by means (solid bars) and standard deviation (error bars), with each dot representing a tumor.
Figure 4Relationships between other clinical parameters versus quantified 5-ALA-induced fluorescence intensity in mosaic plots. Y-axis indicates the probability and the color indicates each group to be compared with the visibility of the fluorescence (Visible or Non-visible). Legends are on the right side of each panel. (a) Gd enhancement of tumor on the MRI, (b) IDH status, and (c) use of AED versus 5-ALA induced fluorescence intensity classified into two groups; Visible (including Strong and Moderate groups) or Non-visible (Weak and None). Pearson Chi-Square test yielded significance for the enhancement (a, p = 0.0007) and IDH status (b, p = 0.0434) but not for AED use (c, p = 0.6996).