| Literature DB >> 35326296 |
Yi-Cheng Tai1, Yi-Sheng Tai2,3, Chang-Hsien Ou4, Chun-Chung Lui5, Hao-Kuang Wang6, Hung-Chang Kuo7, Shih-Pin Hsu1,8.
Abstract
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak can be spontaneous or nonspontaneous. The management options include conservative treatments, blood patch, and surgical repairs. We compared clinical symptoms, image findings, management options, hospitalization, and relapse rates among different causes of CSF leaks. Eighty-one patients were recruited: 20 with spontaneous and 61 with nonspontaneous CSF leaks. Nonspontaneous causes included lumbar puncture, surgery, and trauma. Surgery sites comprised sphenoid, spine, skull base, and calvaria. Spontaneous CSF leak came from the sphenoid or spine. Age, gender, body mass index, initial symptoms, hospitalization, treatment courses, and recurrence rates showed no difference between the groups. The spontaneous group had higher CSF accumulations on their MRIs. MRI pachymeninge enhancement showed the highest sensitivity (78.6%) for intracranial hypotension. Meningitis occurred in 1/3 of sphenoid, skull base, and calvarian surgeries. Earlier reoperation was correlated with shorter hospitalization (r = 0.651), but the recurrence rates were similar. Longer intervals between surgery and CSF leak encouraged reoperation. Among the spontaneous spine and lumbar puncture-related CSF leaks, 57.1% of them responded to 4 days of conservative treatment. Among the trauma-related CSF leaks, 90.9% of them required surgical repair. The demographic data and symptoms were similar in various groups of CSF leak. The symptom onset durations and treatment strategies were different. However, the recurrence rates were similar.Entities:
Keywords: CSF; blood patch; cerebrospinal fluid; leak; spontaneous
Year: 2022 PMID: 35326296 PMCID: PMC8945904 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12030340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Figure 1Study algorithm.
Demographic data of spontaneous and nonspontaneous CSF leak.
| Spontaneous | Nonspontaneous | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient number | 20 | 61 | |
| Age | 43.6 ± 9.2 | 43.1 ± 15.2 | 0.888 |
| Gender (M:F) | 6:14 | 31:30 | 0.105 |
| Onset duration (days) | 8.9 ± 9.4 | 3.6 ± 4.7 | 0.033 |
| Headache as the first symptom | 14 (70%) | 29 (47.5%) | 0.081 |
| Headache pain score | 5.4 ± 2.4 | 4.3 ± 2.1 | 0.093 |
| Meningitis | 2 (10%) | 10 (16.4%) | 0.721 |
| MRI of CSF accumulation | 16 (80%) | 31 (51%) | 0.035 |
| Management | |||
| Conservative | 8 (40%) | 21 (34.4%) | 0.652 |
| Blood patch | 7 (35%) | 2 (3.2%) | <0.001 |
| Surgery | 5 (25%) | 38 (62.4%) | 0.047 |
| Conservative treatment duration (days) | 6.5 ± 4.5 | 11.6 ± 18.1 | 0.048 |
| Hospitalization (days) | 10.6 ± 4.2 | 13.7 ± 13.2 | 0.109 |
| Recurrence | 8 (40%) | 13 (21.3%) | 0.098 |
| Days before recurrence | 58.9 ± 87.0 | 34.5 ± 38.4 | 0.517 |
| Recurrence management | 3 | 2 | 0.325 |
| Blood patch | 3 | 0 | 0.042 |
| Surgery | 2 | 11 | 0.018 |
| Recurrence management duration (days) | 9.4 ± 3.0 | 17.5 ± 9.3 | 0.02 |
| 3rd recurrence | 1 (5%) | 1 (1.6%) | 1 |
Subgroup analysis of nonspontaneous CSF leak.
| Nonspontaneous CSF Leak | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sphenoid Surgery | Spine Surgery | Skull Base Surgery | Calvarial Surgery | Lumbar Puncture | Trauma | ||
| Patient number | 16 | 18 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 11 | |
| Open procedure | 10 (62.5%) | 15 (83.3%) | 6 (100%) | 3 (100%) | N/A | N/A | 0.229 |
| Number of operations | 1 ± 0 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 3.7 ± 0.9 | 1 | N/A | <0.001 |
| From last procedure to symptom onset (days) | 13 ± 20.7 | 18.6 ± 18.3 | 31.2 ± 37.8 | 201 ± 196 | 1.7 ± 0.8 | N/A | <0.001 |
| Symptom onset duration (days) | 2 ± 2.3 | 6.6 ± 6.5 | 3.7 ± 4.6 | 4.7 ± 3.9 | 1.9 ± 0.8 | 2 ± 1.7 | 0.048 |
| Headache: rhinorrhea | 6:10 | 11:0 1 | 1:4 2 | 1:0 3 | 7:0 | 3:8 | 6/15 5 |
| Headache VAS | 2.2 ± 2.4 | 5.9 ± 1.5 | 0.75 ± 1.3 | 0 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | <0.001 4 |
| Meningitis | 5 (31.25%) | 0 | 2 (33.3%) | 1 (33.3%) | 0 | 2 (18.2%) | 1/15 5 |
| Treatment | |||||||
| Conservative | 4 (25%) | 8 (44.4%) | 1 (16.7%) | 1 (33.3%) | 5 (71.4%) | 2 (18.2%) | 1/15 5 |
| Surgery | 12 (75%) | 10 (55.6%) | 5 (83.3%) | 2 (66.7%) | 0 | 9 (81.8%) | 4/15 5 |
| Blood patch | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (28.6%) | 0 | 1/15 5 |
| Conservative treatment duration (days) | 9 ± 10.4 | 11.3 ± 14.8 | 4.2 ± 3.2 | 11.3 ± 5.7 | 4 ± 2.9 | 24.7 ± 31.6 | 0.131 |
| Hospitalization days | 21.9 ± 25.2 | 14.5 ± 18.5 | 10.3 ± 4.2 | 21 ± 7.3 | 4.6 ± 3.1 | 14.9 ± 7.9 | 0.372 |
| MRI with CSF accumulation | 6 (18.75%) | 15 (83.3%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (54.5%) | 5/15 5 |
| Recurrence | 3 (18.75%) | 6 (33.3%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (36.4%) | 0/15 5 |
| Days before recurrence | 23 ± 22.0 | 20.3 ± 14.9 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 67.5 ± 51.2 | 0.157 |
| Recurrence management | 0.692 | ||||||
| Conservative | 1 (33.3%) | 1 (16.7%) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0 | |
| Surgery | 2 (66.7%) | 5 (83.3%) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 4 (100%) | |
| Recurrence management duration (days) | 30.3 ± 5.6 | 10.2 ± 1.6 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 16.8 ± 6.4 | 0.002 |
1 Three patients with low back pain, two with neck pain, one with dizziness, and one with lump of the lumbar spine; 2 one patient with right abducens palsy; 3 one patient with conscious disturbance and one with fever; 4 Kruskal–Wallis test, calvarial surgery was excluded because of insufficient case number; 5 number of significant Fisher exact tests among total 15 tests. Please see supplementary data for more details. N/A: not applicable.
Figure 2Subgroup analysis of surgery-related and spinal CSF leak. Panel (A): in all surgery-related CSF leak, only “interval from the last operation to CSF leak” was related to clinical decision to reoperate. Panel (B): in all surgery-related CSF leak, there was a strong correlation between preop supportive durations and total hospitalization duration, which indicated that earlier reoperation can shorten hospital stay. Panel (C): In spontaneous spinal and lumbar puncture-related CSF leak, patients had, on average, 4 days of conservative treatments before being referred for blood patch. Patients without blood patch needed an average of 7.33 days of conservative treatments. However, there was no difference in total hospital stay.
Subgroup analysis of spontaneous CSF leak.
| Spontaneous CSF Leak | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sphenoid | Spinal | Unknown | |||||
| Cervical | Thoracic | Lumbar | Total | ||||
| Patient number | 6 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 3 | |
| Symptom onset (days) | 17 ± 11.1 | 3.3 ± 2.8 | 4 | 3 ± 1 | 3.3 ± 2.4 | 14 ± 5.1 | |
| Headache: rhinorrhea | 0:6 | 7:0 | 1:0 | 3:0 | 11:0 | 3:0 | <0.001 |
| Headache VAS | N/A | 5.1 ± 2 | 3 | 5.3 ± 3.4 | 5 ± 2.5 | 7 ± 0.8 | |
| Meningitis | 2 (33.3%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Treatment | |||||||
| Conservative | 1 (16.7%) | 3 (42.9%) | 0 | 1 (33.3%) | 4 (36.4%) | 3 (100%) | 0.6 |
| Nonconservative | 5 (83.3%) | 4 (57.1%) | 1 (100%) | 2 (66.7%) | 7 (63.6%) | 0 | |
| Conservative treatment duration (days) | 5.6 ± 5.1 | 7.6 ± 5 | 13 | 5.3 ± 1.9 | 6.7 ± 4.3 | 7.3 ± 2.6 | |
| Hospitalization days | 12.8 ± 3.9 | 9.4 ± 4.4 | 13 | 11 ± 2.2 | 10.2 ± 3.9 | 7.3 ± 2.6 | |
| MRI with intracranial hypotension | 6 (100%) | 6 (85.7%) | 1 (100%) | 3 (100%) | 10 (91%) | 1 (33.3%) | 1 |
| MRI with CSF accumulation | 6 (100%) | 6 (85.7%) | 1 (100%) | 3 (100%) | 10 (91%) | 0 | 1 |
| Recurrence | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 (36.3%) | 1 | 0.80 |
| Days before recurrence | 128 ± 112 | 22.5 ± 15.3 | 0 | 3 | 12 ± 15.2 | 30 | |
| Recurrence management | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.786 |
| Blood patch | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0.125 |
| Surgery | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.429 |
| Recurrence management duration (days) | 9 ± 0 | 9.5 ± 5.6 | 0 | 15 | 8.5 ± 5.7 | 5 | |
| 3rd recurrence | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
* Comparison between sphenoid and total spinal CSF leak.
Figure 3MRI findings of intracranial hypotension. Panels (A–C) were T1-weighted images with contrast enhancement (arrows). Panel (A) revealed generalized enhancement of the meninges, while panel (B) showed partial enhancement of the frontotemporal region, and panel (C) showed partial enhancement of the occipital region. Panel (D): subdural fluid accumulation on the left hemisphere (arrow) on T2-weighted image. Panel (E): engorgement of the superior sagittal sinus (arrows) and transverse sinus (asterisks) on T2-weighted image. Panel (F): T1-weighted image with contrast enhancement demonstrates pituitary hyperemia (arrow). Panel (G): T1-weighted image without contrast shows brain sagging with cerebellar tonsil herniation (arrow).