Literature DB >> 3532592

[Therapy and prevention of reflux esophagitis. Results of a multicenter study with cimetidine. I: Epidemiology and results of acute therapy].

J R Siewert, R Ottenjann, K Heilmann, A Neiss, H Döpfer.   

Abstract

In a sequential observational study efficacy and safety of two dosage regimens of cimetidine for the treatment of reflux-oesophagitis (RE) were examined. 22 office-based specialists took part in the trial. 187 patients received 1600 mg cimetidine (400 mg q.i.d.) daily and 136 patients received 800 mg cimetidine (400 mg b.i.d.) daily, over twelve weeks. The two dosages proved to be equally effective. In the group of patients with RE of stage I at the beginning of the trial, the healing rates were 82% under 1600 mg cimetidine/die and 86% under 800 mg cimetidine/die. In the group of those patients, who entered the study with RE of stage II, in both dosage groups the lesions of 87% of the patients were healed completely or had decreased to stage I. The severity of the mucosal lesions was judged endoscopically, based on a classification scheme modified according to Savary and Miller. The incidence of unwanted symptoms was not significantly different in both dosage groups (1600 mg: 5.3%, 800 mg: 3.4%); none of the symptoms which occurred was judged as definitely caused by cimetidine. The patient collective of the trial was characterized epidemiologically; out of the risk factors examined, only duration of RE history and number of previous RE episodes correlated with the severity of the disease, smoking and alcohol consumption showed no influence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3532592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0044-2771            Impact factor:   2.000


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of pantoprazole magnesium and pantoprazole sodium in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial.

Authors:  Jasper Hein
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  [Correct diagnosis for indication in gastroesophageal reflux disease].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; E Bollschweiler; Ch Gutschow; P Malfertheiner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Head-to-head comparison of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of erosive esophagitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Hong Wang; Jia-Qing Huang; Ge-Fan Zheng; Harry Hua-Xiang Xia; Wai-Man Wong; Shiu-Kum Lam; Benjamin Chun-Yu Wong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Vicryl-scarf-induced scarring around esophagogastric junction as treatment of esophageal reflux disease. An experimental study in the dog.

Authors:  H Feussner; O P Horvath; J R Siewert
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Long-term maintenance treatment of reflux esophagitis with omeprazole. Prospective study in patients with H2-blocker-resistant esophagitis.

Authors:  H Koop; R Arnold
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Effects of pantoprazole 20 mg in mildgastroesophageal reflux disease: Once-daily treatment in the acute phase, and comparison of on-demand versus continuous treatment in the long term.

Authors:  Werner Janssen; Eberhard Meier; Gudrun Gatz; Bernd Pfaffenberger
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2005-07

7.  Reoperation following failed fundoplication.

Authors:  J R Siewert; J Isolauri; H Feussner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Pilot study of on-demand therapy with pantoprazole 20mg for long-term treatment in patients with mild gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Theo Scholten; Uwe Pustlauk; Peter Sander; Martina Bohuschke; Gudrun Gatz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.859

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.