Literature DB >> 35325357

Effects of Magnetite Nanoparticles and Static Magnetic Field on Neural Differentiation of Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Ana T Semeano1,2,3, Fabiano A Tofoli4, Juliana C Corrêa-Velloso1, Ana P de Jesus Santos1, Ágatha Oliveira-Giacomelli1, Rafaela R Cardoso4, Mateus A Pessoa5, Edroaldo Lummertz da Rocha5, Gustavo Ribeiro4, Merari F R Ferrari4, Lygia V Pereira4, Yang D Teng6, Denise F S Petri7, Henning Ulrich8.   

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental processes of pluripotent cells, such as proliferation and differentiation, are influenced by external natural forces. Despite the presence of biogenic magnetite nanoparticles in the central nervous system and constant exposure to the Earth's magnetic fields and other sources, there is scant knowledge regarding the role of electromagnetic stimuli in neurogenesis. Moreover, emerging applications of electrical and magnetic stimulation to treat neurological disorders emphasize the relevance of understanding the impact and mechanisms behind these stimuli. Here, the effects of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) in polymeric coatings and the static external magnetic field (EMF) were investigated on neural induction of murine embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). The results show that the presence of 0.5% MNPs in collagen-based coatings facilitates the migration and neuronal maturation of mESCs and hiPSCs in vitro. Furthermore, the application of 0.4 Tesla EMF perpendicularly to the cell culture plane, discernibly stimulates proliferation and guide fate decisions of the pluripotent stem cells, depending on the origin of stem cells and their developmental stage. Mechanistic analysis reveals that modulation of ionic homeostasis and the expression of proteins involved in cytostructural, liposomal and cell cycle checkpoint functions provide a principal underpinning for the impact of electromagnetic stimuli on neural lineage specification and proliferation. These findings not only explore the potential of the magnetic stimuli as neural differentiation and function modulator but also highlight the risks that immoderate magnetic stimulation may affect more susceptible neurons, such as dopaminergic neurons.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomagnetic effects; Dopaminergic neurons; Embryonic stem cells; Magnetic field; Magnetic nanoparticles; Neural differentiation; iPSCs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35325357     DOI: 10.1007/s12015-022-10332-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep        ISSN: 2629-3277            Impact factor:   6.692


  38 in total

1.  Neuronal differentiation involves a shift from glucose oxidation to fermentation.

Authors:  Maynara Fornazari; Isis C Nascimento; Arthur A Nery; Camille C Caldeira da Silva; Alicia J Kowaltowski; Henning Ulrich
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.945

2.  Neuronal differentiation of P19 embryonal carcinoma cells modulates kinin B2 receptor gene expression and function.

Authors:  Antonio Henrique B Martins; Rodrigo R Resende; Paromita Majumder; Marcella Faria; Dulce E Casarini; Attila Tárnok; Walter Colli; João Bosco Pesquero; Henning Ulrich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Hybrid composites of xanthan and magnetic nanoparticles for cellular uptake.

Authors:  Vânia Blasques Bueno; Anielle Martins Silva; Leandro Ramos Souza Barbosa; Luiz Henrique Catalani; Erico Teixeira-Neto; Daniel Reinaldo Cornejo; Denise Freitas Siqueira Petri
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Evolution and possible storage of information in a magnetite system of significance for brain development.

Authors:  Fredrik C Størmer; Ivar Mysterud; Tore Slagsvold
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Investigation of age-related variations in biogenic magnetite levels in the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Jon Dobson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Defining reference genes for qPCR normalization to study biotic and abiotic stress responses in Vigna mungo.

Authors:  Anirban Kundu; Anju Patel; Amita Pal
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 4.570

7.  PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes.

Authors:  Vamsi K Mootha; Cecilia M Lindgren; Karl-Fredrik Eriksson; Aravind Subramanian; Smita Sihag; Joseph Lehar; Pere Puigserver; Emma Carlsson; Martin Ridderstråle; Esa Laurila; Nicholas Houstis; Mark J Daly; Nick Patterson; Jill P Mesirov; Todd R Golub; Pablo Tamayo; Bruce Spiegelman; Eric S Lander; Joel N Hirschhorn; David Altshuler; Leif C Groop
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Modulation of mouse embryonic stem cell proliferation and neural differentiation by the P2X7 receptor.

Authors:  Talita Glaser; Sophia La Banca de Oliveira; Arquimedes Cheffer; Renata Beco; Patrícia Martins; Maynara Fornazari; Claudiana Lameu; Helio Miranda Costa Junior; Robson Coutinho-Silva; Henning Ulrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The role of purinergic receptors in stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Constanze Kaebisch; Dorothee Schipper; Patrick Babczyk; Edda Tobiasch
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 7.271

10.  Novel Conducting and Biodegradable Copolymers with Noncytotoxic Properties toward Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Aruã C da Silva; Ana Teresa S Semeano; André H B Dourado; Henning Ulrich; Susana I Cordoba de Torresi
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2018-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.