Literature DB >> 35325208

Loss of SALT OVERLY SENSITIVE 1 prevents virescence in chloroplast K+/H+ EFFLUX ANTIPORTER-deficient mutants.

Rachael Ann DeTar1,2, Ricarda Höhner1, Nikolay Manavski2, Marius Blackholm2, Jörg Meurer2, Hans-Henning Kunz1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35325208      PMCID: PMC9237680          DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiac142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.005


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The importance of plastid K+/H+ EFFLUX ANTIPORTERs (KEAs) for organelle function and photosynthesis has drawn a lot of research interest over the last years (Aranda-Sicilia et al., 2012; Armbruster et al., 2014; Kunz et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2017). Our group recently reported that the loss of KEA1 and KEA2, the two inner envelope membrane carriers, affects ion homeostasis, rRNA processing in the stroma, and concomitant plastid gene expression (PGE). As a consequence, the GENOMES UNCOUPLED 1 (GUN1)-dependent retrograde signaling (RS) pathway is activated to halt organelle biogenesis through suppression of GOLDEN2-LIKE (GLK) transcription factors and their targets, photosynthesis-associated nuclear-encoded genes (PhANGs) (DeTar et al., 2021). These insights were enabled by a unique salt rescue phenomenon inherent to the virescent (pale young leaves) of kea1kea2 loss-of-function mutants (Kunz et al., 2014). When mutant plants are treated with moderate concentrations of NaCl, they exhibit a recovery in plastid rRNA metabolism, higher rates of PGE, more wild-type (WT)-like expression of nuclear-encoded genes, and finally greener rosettes with higher chlorophyll (Chl) content and increased photosynthetic rates (DeTar et al., 2021). Here, we endeavor to better understand the mechanism of the salt rescue in kea1kea2 through the isolation and characterization of a genetic suppressor of the kea1kea2 phenotype. Plants rely on high cellular K content (≥100 mM). Soil salinity or NaCl treatment induce K deprivation in species unadapted to saline habitats (Shin and Adams, 2014). We and others have found that loss of KEA1/2 results in a dangerous K excess in leaf tissue (Höhner et al., 2016; Sánchez-McSweeney et al., 2021). Exogenous NaCl treatment can counter these effects, resetting K+ concentrations in kea1kea2 leaves to WT level (DeTar et al., 2021). This may occur either through reduced K+ root-level uptake or by preventing K+ long-distance transfer into leaves. These questions inspired us to test if a similar rescue effect in kea1kea2 can be achieved without external Na through genetic manipulation of the plant’s K:Na ratio via the plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter (SODIUM OVERLY SENSITIVE) SOS1 (Shi et al., 2000, 2002). SOS1 is thought to extrude Na+ ions from the root during salt stress and to control long-distance transport of Na+ via entry or reuptake from the xylem (Shi et al., 2002; Shin and Adams, 2014). sos1 loss-of-function mutants exhibit decreased K content, lower rates of K+ uptake, less K+ root-to-shoot translocation, increased Na level, and severe salt sensitivity (Wu et al., 1996; Zhu et al., 1998; Shi et al., 2002). Publicly available data from the ionomics database iHub confirm an average three-fold increase in Na accumulation in several untreated sos1 null mutant alleles (Baxter et al., 2007). Therefore, we generated two independent triple T-DNA insertion lines (Supplemental Figure S1 and Supplemental Table S1) kea1-1kea2-1sos1-15 (ABRC stock: CS72656) and kea1-2kea2-2sos1-16 (CS72657) and compared their respective phenotypic features to their parental lines (Figure 1 and Supplemental Figure S2). The introgression of both independent sos1 loss-of-function insertions resulted in visibly reduced chlorosis in kea1kea2sos1 plants without any additional NaCl input beyond what was already present in the growth substrate (Figure 1A and Supplemental Figure S2A). Concurrently, triple mutants had increased levels of Chl a and b compared with kea1kea2 plants, but no alteration of Chl a/b ratio (Figure 1C). The additional loss of SOS1 function in kea1kea2 also partially relieved the suppression of photosynthesis as the theoretical maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) in the triple mutant increased compared with the double mutant (Fv/Fm; Figure 1, B and C and Supplemental Figure S2, B and C). The kea1kea2sos1 line exhibited WT-level energy partitioning into photochemistry (ΦII) and regulated non-photochemical quenching (ΦNPQ), yet increased partitioning to nonregulated non-photochemical quenching (ΦNO; Figure 1C and Supplemental Figure S2C). In contrast, the kea1kea2 double mutant exhibited decreased ΦII, increased ΦNPQ, and equivalent ΦNO compared with WT. These parameters indicate the kea1kea2sos1 lines partition as much harvested photoenergy to electron transfer as the WT, at the cost of sustaining higher levels of photodamage. In contrast, kea1kea2 partitions more energy to safe NPQ dissipation, thus minimizing photodamage, but at the cost of less energy routed toward photochemistry. Generally, the phenotypic trends for kea1kea2sos1 mirror the published behavior for exogenous-salt treated kea1kea2, indicating that loss-of-function of SOS1 is a genetic mechanism of phenotypic recovery for kea1kea2. A defect in KEA1 and KEA2 did not benefit the salt tolerance in triple mutants, that is kea1kea2sos1 were similarly NaCl sensitive as sos1 single mutant controls (Supplemental Figure S3).
Figure 1

Loss of SOS1 in the kea1kea2 background results in phenotypic recovery. A, RGB and B, false color image of the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) for WT, kea1-1kea2-1, sos1-15, and loss-of-function triple line kea1-1kea2-1sos1-15. C, Heatmap showing percent change from WT for assorted parameters. Asterisks denote genotypes where the mean for the given parameter was significantly different from the WT (P < 0.05 based on Tukey’s HSD test if data for all genotypes were normally distributed, or pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test if one or more genotype did not exhibit normal distribution of values). Chl parameters include concentration per unit fresh weight for Chl a, Chl b, total Chl, and Chl a/b ratio (n = 4). Pulse-amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorescence parameters include theoretical maximum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), quantum yield of PSII (ΦII), quantum yield of ΦNPQ, and quantum yield of ΦNO (n = 7 for all PAM fluorescence parameters). D, The leaf ionome of each mutant line in comparison to the WT. The y-axis shows the modified z-score for a respective element in each line compared with WT (n = 5–6). Elements for which the modified z-score is greater than 1.0 are likely substantially different in concentration from WT in corresponding mutant. Rubidium (Rb+) uptake over time as a proxy for Potassium (K+) uptake in (E) shoots and (F) roots of hydroponically grown plants (±sd). Asterisks denote points which are significantly different from the WT at a given timepoint (n = 3, P < 0.05 from Tukey’s HSD or pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test). G, Representative RNA probing of plastid rRNAs from aforementioned genotypes. Fragment sizes are indicated on the right-hand side of each blot in kilonucleotides (knt). Map of probe binding positions and expected fragments shown in Supplemental Figure S4A. Asterisks indicate fragments with altered abundance in the kea1kea2 mutant (n = 2; biorep shown in Supplemental Figure S4B). H, Representative immunoblot of chloroplast proteins on leaf extracts from WT (three concentrations), sos1-15, kea1-1kea2-1, and kea1-1kea2-1sos1-15 mutants (n = 2; accompanying Coomassie-stained gel shown in Supplemental Figure S4C, bioreplicate shown in Supplemental Figure S4D). I, The expression of the GOLDEN-LIKE 1 (GLK1) transcription factor based on RT-qPCR (±sd, n = 3). Asterisks denote points which are significantly different from the WT (P-value < 0.05 based on Tukey’s HSD test).

Loss of SOS1 in the kea1kea2 background results in phenotypic recovery. A, RGB and B, false color image of the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) for WT, kea1-1kea2-1, sos1-15, and loss-of-function triple line kea1-1kea2-1sos1-15. C, Heatmap showing percent change from WT for assorted parameters. Asterisks denote genotypes where the mean for the given parameter was significantly different from the WT (P < 0.05 based on Tukey’s HSD test if data for all genotypes were normally distributed, or pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test if one or more genotype did not exhibit normal distribution of values). Chl parameters include concentration per unit fresh weight for Chl a, Chl b, total Chl, and Chl a/b ratio (n = 4). Pulse-amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorescence parameters include theoretical maximum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), quantum yield of PSII (ΦII), quantum yield of ΦNPQ, and quantum yield of ΦNO (n = 7 for all PAM fluorescence parameters). D, The leaf ionome of each mutant line in comparison to the WT. The y-axis shows the modified z-score for a respective element in each line compared with WT (n = 5–6). Elements for which the modified z-score is greater than 1.0 are likely substantially different in concentration from WT in corresponding mutant. Rubidium (Rb+) uptake over time as a proxy for Potassium (K+) uptake in (E) shoots and (F) roots of hydroponically grown plants (±sd). Asterisks denote points which are significantly different from the WT at a given timepoint (n = 3, P < 0.05 from Tukey’s HSD or pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test). G, Representative RNA probing of plastid rRNAs from aforementioned genotypes. Fragment sizes are indicated on the right-hand side of each blot in kilonucleotides (knt). Map of probe binding positions and expected fragments shown in Supplemental Figure S4A. Asterisks indicate fragments with altered abundance in the kea1kea2 mutant (n = 2; biorep shown in Supplemental Figure S4B). H, Representative immunoblot of chloroplast proteins on leaf extracts from WT (three concentrations), sos1-15, kea1-1kea2-1, and kea1-1kea2-1sos1-15 mutants (n = 2; accompanying Coomassie-stained gel shown in Supplemental Figure S4C, bioreplicate shown in Supplemental Figure S4D). I, The expression of the GOLDEN-LIKE 1 (GLK1) transcription factor based on RT-qPCR (±sd, n = 3). Asterisks denote points which are significantly different from the WT (P-value < 0.05 based on Tukey’s HSD test). Next, we investigated if the kea1kea2sos1 recovery phenotype, that is reduced chlorosis and higher photosynthetic efficiency, corresponded with WT levels of various elements in leaf tissue (Figure 1D, Supplemental Figure S2D and Table 1, Supplemental Table S2). We used an established total X-ray fluorescence protocol (Höhner et al., 2016) to determine the ionome of rosettes from the WT, kea1kea2, sos1, and the triple mutant. To streamline the presentation of the ionomics data, we calculated a modified z-score akin to previous high-throughput ionomics experiments (Campos et al., 2021). Z-score is calculated as , where and represent the means of the mutant and the WT, and and represent the standard deviations. A mutant allele z-score greater than 1 indicates the mean concentration for a given element is substantially different from the WT. We also checked for statistically significant differences between all genotypes for each element (P-value < 0.05, Table 1 and Supplemental Table S2) based on Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test if data were normally distributed, or Pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test if one or more genotypes did not exhibit normal distribution of values. Phosphorus (P) and rubidium (Rb) were significantly increased in both independent kea1kea2 double mutant lines, replicating previous results (Höhner et al., 2019; DeTar et al., 2021). K levels were significantly increased in the kea1-1kea2-1 with a similar trend recorded in the kea1-2kea2-2 double mutant. Intriguingly, the concentrations of these elements dropped so much in kea1kea2sos1 mutants that they did not differ from the WT, suggesting that the triple mutant ionome is mostly reset. This again reflects the effect recorded after exogenous Na+ treatment of kea1kea2 (DeTar et al., 2021) and indicates that the phenotypic rescue is linked to rebalancing the ionome.
Table 1

Leaf elements of WT and mutant alleles

ElementWT
sos1-15
kea1-1kea2-1
kea1-1kea2-1sos1-15
Conc. (µg*mg−1 DW)Std. DevConc. (µg*mg−1 DW)Std. DevMod. Z-scoreConc. (µg*mg−1 DW)Std. DevMod. Z-scoreConc. (µg*mg−1 DW)Std. DevMod. Z-score
Phosphorus9.892.0310.42.270.12 15.9 1.97 1.50 12.01.160.77
Sulfur8.573.858.664.000.019.472.230.158.772.450.00
Chlorine0.6400.6600.4820.2700.170.3610.1410.350.2850.1270.59
Potassium40.03.8539.94.040.01 50.8 5.44 1.17 42.94.800.13
Calcium44.25.9346.611.620.1448.16.760.3150.312.340.14
Manganese0.0550.0200.0610.0290.120.0450.0210.250.0580.0240.46
Iron0.0610.0220.0680.0210.170.0750.0220.310.0960.0350.31
Nickel0.0010.0000.0010.0000.260.0020.0010.300.0040.0040.09
Copper0.0060.0010.0070.0000.680.0070.0010.800.0070.0000.46
Zinc0.1600.0640.1210.0140.500.1130.0080.640.1040.0080.83
Rubidium0.0100.0010.0100.0010.12 0.015 0.002 1.40 0.0120.0030.48
Strontium0.0480.0120.0510.0130.100.0510.0090.130.0530.0140.02

Bold values with indicate means statistically different from all other genotypes for that element (n = 3 for Cu and Zn; n = 5–6 for all other elements, P-value < 0.05 with Tukey’s honest significance test or pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test if one or more genotype did not exhibit normal distribution of values).

Leaf elements of WT and mutant alleles Bold values with indicate means statistically different from all other genotypes for that element (n = 3 for Cu and Zn; n = 5–6 for all other elements, P-value < 0.05 with Tukey’s honest significance test or pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test if one or more genotype did not exhibit normal distribution of values). We have previously shown that kea1kea2 phenotypes coincide with K overaccumulation. We hypothesized that introgression of the sos1 loss-of-function allele results in increased competition between K+ and Na+ for root-to-shoot translocation, thus preventing overaccumulation of K in the aerial tissues. To test this, we performed Rb+ uptake assays as a proxy for K+ import into plants. Arabidopsis plants of different genotypes were grown hydroponically in 50 mL conical tubes filled with ¼ Murashige–Skoog Medium for about 4 weeks total. At the beginning of the uptake experiment, the growth media was exchanged with 1 mM rubidium (dissolved in 2.5 mM MES, pH 5.8 with KOH) for 24 h in total, with sampling of shoot (Figure 1E) and root (Figure 1F) tissue for Rb at regular intervals. We found significantly higher Rb transport into kea1kea2 shoots compared with the WT after 8 and 24 h (P < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD or pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test). In the kea1kea2sos1 triple mutant, shoot Rb was only significantly above WT at the 8 h data point, but not different from the WT after 24 h. All changes in root-level accumulation of Rb between genotypes were minor relative to the extreme accumulation of Rb in kea1kea2 shoots. We interpret these data to suggest that loss of SOS1 in the kea1kea2 background does not impair root-level uptake of K+, but rather slows root-to-shoot translocation of K+. Confirming other reports (Wu et al., 1996), we also found a slightly reduced root-to-shoot Rb+ translocation in the sos1 single mutant. kea1kea2 plants have pronounced chloroplast rRNA maturation defects, which can be rescued by exogenous Na (DeTar et al., 2021). The lack of KEA1/2 transport activity may affect rRNA secondary structure and interactions with RNA processing factors. Thus, we evaluated how a SOS1 loss-of-function influences rRNA maturation in kea1kea2. kea1kea2sos1 triple mutants had lower levels of unprocessed 23S rRNA precursors (Figure 1G, red asterisks, Supplemental Figure S4, A and B and Supplemental Table S3) compared with the kea1kea2 mutant. The triple mutant also recovered WT levels of processed 4.5S and 5S rRNA (Figure 1G, red asterisks). As expected, the sos1 single mutant did not show any plastid rRNA processing defects. Thus, rebalancing the ion homeostasis via SOS1 loss-of-function also recovers rRNA processing in the kea1kea2 background. Consequently, this should recover stromal protein synthesis and promote the expression of PhANGs. This was tested through immunoblotting of a subset of plastid-encoded proteins, including the large subunit of Rubisco (RbcL) and the D1 reaction center of PSII (PsbA). For nuclear-encoded plastid targeted proteins, we probed the LIGHT HARVESTING COMPLEX I (Lhcb1), the small subunit of Rubisco (RbcS), and TRANSLOCON AT THE INNER ENVELOPE MEMBRANE OF CHLOROPLASTS 110 (TIC110), a component of the protein import apparatus. We normalized loading of SDS gels to fresh weight rather than Chl or total protein to preclude any artificial biases in favor of the kea1kea2 mutant, which has lower Chl content and reduced protein production (DeTar et al., 2021). In line with our previous study, the kea1kea2 mutant exhibited decreased levels of plastid-encoded proteins RbcL and PsbA, which were partially recovered by introducing the sos1 mutation (Figure 1H). The two PhANGs RbcS and Lhcb1 are known to be dynamically downregulated in response to loss of PGE. Indeed, both proteins were also downregulated in kea1kea2, yet recovered in kea1kea2sos1. TIC110 was slightly higher or unchanged in abundance in kea1kea2 as observed before (DeTar et al., 2021). See Supplemental Figure S4C for Coomassie staining, that is protein loading corresponding to immunoblot in Figure 1H and Supplemental Figure S4D for an independent bioreplicate immunoblot. Collectively, our results suggest that both the nuclear-encoded and plastome-encoded portions of the plastid proteome are recovered by loss of SOS1 in the kea1kea2 mutant, as was observed with exogenous salt treatment (DeTar et al., 2021). Finally, KEA1/2 loss and subsequent disruption of PGE trigger GUN1-dependent RS to downregulate the expression of PhANGs (DeTar et al., 2021). This is mediated by suppression of the GOLDEN-LIKE 1 (GLK1) transcription factor (Waters et al., 2009; Martin et al., 2016). GLK1 expression was quantified using RT-qPCR (Figure 1I). As previously observed, the expression of GLK1 was significantly lower in kea1kea2 compared with the WT. GLK1 expression was unaffected in the sos1 single mutant line and the kea1kea2sos1 line compared with the WT (P < 0.05 based on Tukey’s HSD test). These results explain the recovery of steady-state protein levels for the two PhANGs LHCB1 and RBCS. In summary, the additional loss-of-function of SOS1 in the kea1kea2 background induces a similar phenotypic recovery as observed when kea1kea2 mutants are treated with exogenous Na. This shows that the exact mechanism of rebalancing K levels is less important to prevent the kea1kea2 virescent phenotype, that is alleviate the defects of chloroplast rRNA processing, PGE, and photosynthesis in the kea1kea2 background. The Rb+ uptake experiments indicate that root-level K+ import is not per se higher in kea1kea2, but rather point to an increased root-to-shoot K+ translocation in mutants compared with the WT (Figure 2, A and B). In contrast, kea1kea2sos1 exhibits WT levels of root-to-shoot Rb/K translocation (Figure 2C). This provides evidence for the hypothesis that chloroplast K+ transport may play a direct or indirect role in moderating overall plant K levels. While K is a key nutrient, our research has shown that plants can have too much of a good thing. Plants carefully maintain ion gradients not only to optimize membrane potentials and nutrition, but to minimize ion toxicity.
Figure 2

Model of SOS1 loss-of-function-mediated recovery of kea1kea2 phenotype. A, In WT leaf cells, potassium (K) equilibrium within the plant and the chloroplasts is maintained via K uptake and translocation. Optimal K level promotes plastid rRNA maturation and PGE. GLK1/PhANG expression in the nucleus progresses. B, In kea1kea2, K translocation into leaf tissue is increased compared with WT so that K accumulates in rosettes. Higher K disturbs proper stromal rRNA maturation and PGE, which activates GUN1 and RS resulting in GLK1 and PhANG suppression. Hence, kea1kea2 plants are small, chlorotic, and developmentally compromised. C, In kea1kea2sos1 mutants, loss of SOS1 leads to Na accumulation and less K translocation into rosettes, that is, K leaf levels are lower than in kea1kea2. This prevents perturbation of the chloroplast ionome and allows for proper rates of rRNA maturation and PGE. GUN1 and RS remain inactive which allows for the expression of GLK1 and PhANGs. Consequentially, kea1kea2sos1 plants are greener and more photosynthetically active. However, pleiotropic effects from the joint loss of KEA1/2 and SOS1 trigger ΦNO and prevent size recovery.

Model of SOS1 loss-of-function-mediated recovery of kea1kea2 phenotype. A, In WT leaf cells, potassium (K) equilibrium within the plant and the chloroplasts is maintained via K uptake and translocation. Optimal K level promotes plastid rRNA maturation and PGE. GLK1/PhANG expression in the nucleus progresses. B, In kea1kea2, K translocation into leaf tissue is increased compared with WT so that K accumulates in rosettes. Higher K disturbs proper stromal rRNA maturation and PGE, which activates GUN1 and RS resulting in GLK1 and PhANG suppression. Hence, kea1kea2 plants are small, chlorotic, and developmentally compromised. C, In kea1kea2sos1 mutants, loss of SOS1 leads to Na accumulation and less K translocation into rosettes, that is, K leaf levels are lower than in kea1kea2. This prevents perturbation of the chloroplast ionome and allows for proper rates of rRNA maturation and PGE. GUN1 and RS remain inactive which allows for the expression of GLK1 and PhANGs. Consequentially, kea1kea2sos1 plants are greener and more photosynthetically active. However, pleiotropic effects from the joint loss of KEA1/2 and SOS1 trigger ΦNO and prevent size recovery.

Supplemental data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article. Genotyping of kea1kea2sos1 lines. Loss of SOS1 results in phenotypic recovery of kea1kea2 in independent lines. kea1kea2sos1 alleles exhibit similar salt sensitivity as respective sos1 lines. rRNA probe map and additional bioreplicates and loading controls for RNA and immunoblots. Genotypes and primers used in this study. Leaf elements of independent kea1kea2 and sos1 lines. 80mer RNA probes used in this study. Click here for additional data file.
  16 in total

1.  The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter.

Authors:  H Shi; M Ishitani; C Kim; J K Zhu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The putative plasma membrane Na(+)/H(+) antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance Na(+) transport in plants.

Authors:  Huazhong Shi; Francisco J Quintero; Jose M Pardo; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 3.  Transport, signaling, and homeostasis of potassium and sodium in plants.

Authors:  Eri Adams; Ryoung Shin
Journal:  J Integr Plant Biol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.061

4.  Purdue ionomics information management system. An integrated functional genomics platform.

Authors:  Ivan Baxter; Mourad Ouzzani; Seza Orcun; Brad Kennedy; Shrinivas S Jandhyala; David E Salt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Arabidopsis KEA2, a homolog of bacterial KefC, encodes a K(+)/H(+) antiporter with a chloroplast transit peptide.

Authors:  María Nieves Aranda-Sicilia; Olivier Cagnac; Salil Chanroj; Heven Sze; María Pilar Rodríguez-Rosales; Kees Venema
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-04-21

6.  1,135 ionomes reveal the global pattern of leaf and seed mineral nutrient and trace element diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ana Carolina A L Campos; William F A van Dijk; Priya Ramakrishna; Tom Giles; Pamela Korte; Alex Douglas; Pete Smith; David E Salt
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  SOS1, a Genetic Locus Essential for Salt Tolerance and Potassium Acquisition.

Authors:  S. J. Wu; L. Ding; J. K. Zhu
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  GLK transcription factors coordinate expression of the photosynthetic apparatus in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Mark T Waters; Peng Wang; Muris Korkaric; Richard G Capper; Nigel J Saunders; Jane A Langdale
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Genetic analysis of salt tolerance in arabidopsis. Evidence for a critical role of potassium nutrition.

Authors:  J K Zhu; J Liu; L Xiong
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Phytochrome and retrograde signalling pathways converge to antagonistically regulate a light-induced transcriptional network.

Authors:  Guiomar Martín; Pablo Leivar; Dolores Ludevid; James M Tepperman; Peter H Quail; Elena Monte
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.