Literature DB >> 35324881

Lessons Learned from Programmatic Gains in HIV Service Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic - 41 PEPFAR-Supported Countries, 2020.

Kiva A Fisher, Sadhna V Patel, Neha Mehta, Andrea Stewart, Amy Medley, Emily Kainne Dokubo, Judith D Shang, Janell Wright, Jose Rodas, Shirish Balachandra, Francois Kitenge, Minlangu Mpingulu, Macarena C García, Luis Bonilla, Silas Quaye, Michael Melchior, Ketmala Banchongphanith, Kunjanakorn Phokhasawad, Kondwani Nkanaunena, Alice Maida, Aleny Couto, Jose Mizela, Jahun Ibrahim, Ogbanufe Obinna Charles, Samuel S Malamba, Canisious Musoni, Alex Bolo, Sudhir Bunga, Rangsima Lolekha, Wiphawee Kiatchanon, Ramona Bhatia, Chi Nguyen, John Aberle-Grasse.   

Abstract

The U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) supports country programs in identifying persons living with HIV infection (PLHIV), providing life-saving treatment, and reducing the spread of HIV in countries around the world (1,2). CDC used Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) data* to assess the extent to which COVID-19 mitigation strategies affected HIV service delivery across the HIV care continuum† globally during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Indicators included the number of reported HIV-positive test results, the number of PLHIV who were receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), and the rates of HIV viral load suppression. Percent change in performance was assessed between countries during the first 3 months of 2020, before COVID-19 mitigation efforts began (January-March 2020), and the last 3 months of the calendar year (October-December 2020). Data were reviewed for all 41 countries to assess total and country-level percent change for each indicator. Then, qualitative data were reviewed among countries in the upper quartile to assess specific strategies that contributed to programmatic gains. Overall, positive percent change was observed in PEPFAR-supported countries in HIV treatment (5%) and viral load suppression (2%) during 2020. Countries reporting the highest gains across the HIV care continuum during 2020 attributed successes to reducing or streamlining facility attendance through strategies such as enhancing index testing (offering of testing to the biologic children and partners of PLHIV)§ and community- and home-based testing; treatment delivery approaches; and improvements in data use through monitoring activities, systems, and data quality checks. Countries that reported program improvements during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic offer important information about how lifesaving HIV treatment might be provided during a global public health crisis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35324881      PMCID: PMC8956337          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7112a2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


The U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) supports country programs in identifying persons living with HIV infection (PLHIV), providing life-saving treatment, and reducing the spread of HIV in countries around the world (,). CDC used Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) data* to assess the extent to which COVID-19 mitigation strategies affected HIV service delivery across the HIV care continuum globally during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Indicators included the number of reported HIV-positive test results, the number of PLHIV who were receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), and the rates of HIV viral load suppression. Percent change in performance was assessed between countries during the first 3 months of 2020, before COVID-19 mitigation efforts began (January–March 2020), and the last 3 months of the calendar year (October–December 2020). Data were reviewed for all 41 countries to assess total and country-level percent change for each indicator. Then, qualitative data were reviewed among countries in the upper quartile to assess specific strategies that contributed to programmatic gains. Overall, positive percent change was observed in PEPFAR-supported countries in HIV treatment (5%) and viral load suppression (2%) during 2020. Countries reporting the highest gains across the HIV care continuum during 2020 attributed successes to reducing or streamlining facility attendance through strategies such as enhancing index testing (offering of testing to the biologic children and partners of PLHIV) and community- and home-based testing; treatment delivery approaches; and improvements in data use through monitoring activities, systems, and data quality checks. Countries that reported program improvements during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic offer important information about how lifesaving HIV treatment might be provided during a global public health crisis. During 2020, 41 countries received PEPFAR support for direct HIV service delivery. To determine gains in HIV service delivery, MER indicators were analyzed to identify programmatic changes in 1) the number of reported positive HIV test results, 2) the number of PLHIV receiving ART, and 3) the percentage of PLHIV receiving ART with suppressed HIV viral load** during 2020 to assess change before and during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of sites ranged from three to 1,520 per country. The analysis was limited to sites within each country that reported indicator data during both periods. The number of treatment sites in each country that reported during both periods was proportional to the size of the PEPFAR ART program. Overall percent change for all 41 countries from January–March to October–December 2020 was calculated for each of the three indicators. The percent change for each indicator was further analyzed for countries in the highest quartile for each indicator. A thematic analysis was conducted using qualitative MER narratives for each indicator among countries in the upper quartile to identify specific adaptive strategies that were reported to contribute to gains for each indicator. This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy. Among all 41 countries, programmatic gains (i.e., positive percent changes) were observed in the number of PLHIV reported to be currently receiving treatment and the percentage who had achieved viral load suppression before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Positive percent change among all sites reported across the 41 countries was reported for the number of PLHIV currently receiving treatment (5%) and for HIV viral load suppression (2%). However, an overall negative percent change (−19%) was reported in HIV-positive test results (Figure). Percent change at the country level varied by indicator. Positive percent change was observed in the number of HIV-positive test results reported in 16 (39%) countries, the number of persons receiving ART in 36 (88%) countries, and HIV viral load suppression rates in and 29 of 34 countries with reported data (85%).
FIGURE

Percent change in HIV-positive test results* (A), number of persons with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy (B), and rates of viral load suppression (C) — U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, 41 countries, January–March to October–December 2020

Abbreviations: ART = antiretroviral therapy; UNAIDS = Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; WHO = World Health Organization.

* Number of persons who received a positive HIV test result. https://datim.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000084446-MER-Indicator-Reference-Guides

† Number of adults and children who are currently receiving ART in accordance with the nationally approved treatment protocol (or WHO/UNAIDS standards) at the end of the reporting period. https://datim.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000084446-MER-Indicator-Reference-Guides

§ Percentage of viral load suppression. Only sites that are in the highest quartile in both prepandemic (January–March 2020) and pandemic (October–December 2020) periods are included. Thirty-four of the 41 countries were included; seven countries did not report data for the viral load indicator.

Percent change in HIV-positive test results* (A), number of persons with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy (B), and rates of viral load suppression (C) — U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, 41 countries, January–March to October–December 2020 Abbreviations: ART = antiretroviral therapy; UNAIDS = Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; WHO = World Health Organization. * Number of persons who received a positive HIV test result. https://datim.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000084446-MER-Indicator-Reference-Guides † Number of adults and children who are currently receiving ART in accordance with the nationally approved treatment protocol (or WHO/UNAIDS standards) at the end of the reporting period. https://datim.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000084446-MER-Indicator-Reference-Guides § Percentage of viral load suppression. Only sites that are in the highest quartile in both prepandemic (January–March 2020) and pandemic (October–December 2020) periods are included. Thirty-four of the 41 countries were included; seven countries did not report data for the viral load indicator. Twenty-three (56%) countries were in the upper quartile for at least one indicator, and six (15%) reported the highest overall percent change for two of the three indicators. One country (Nicaragua) showed gains across all three indicators. Countries reporting increases for any of the three indicators spanned all regions where PEPFAR supports HIV programs, including eight countries in West Africa, three in East Africa, two in Southern Africa, five in Central America, four in Asia, and one in the Caribbean. Among countries in the highest quartile, a median increase of 43% was reported in the number of HIV-positive test results identified (range = 25%–430%), 23% in the number of PLHIV receiving ART (range = 11%–965%), and 6% in HIV viral load suppression rates (range = 5%–62%) from January–March to October–December 2020 (during the COVID-19 pandemic) (Table).
TABLE

Countries with upper quartile gains in HIV service delivery* — U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, 23 countries, January–March and October–December 2020

CountryNo. of sitesJan–Mar 2020, no. or %Oct–Dec 2020, no. or %% Change
No. of HIV-positive test results
Indonesia
37
132
700
430.3
Laos
3
63
192
204.8
Liberia
11
180
523
190.6
El Salvador
10
102
181
77.5
Panama
7
65
100
53.8
Nicaragua
5
47
67
42.6
Vietnam
69
1,987
2,767
39.3
Nigeria
1,288
77,099
102,742
33.3
Dominican Republic
17
1,702
2,181
28.1
Rwanda
146
1,450
1,825
25.9
Burkina Faso
17
1,022
1,276
24.9
No. of PLHIV currently receiving ART§
Liberia
12
1,023
10,895
965.0
Nicaragua
6
886
1,328
49.9
Nigeria
1,435
907,653
1,177,770
29.8
Ghana
44
12,181
15,353
26.0
Democratic Republic of the Congo
516
134,107
166,081
23.8
Thailand
36
45,159
55,770
23.5
Togo
24
28,433
34,777
22.3
South Sudan
65
27,926
32,267
15.5
Mozambique
1,520
1,224,808
1,378,579
12.6
Laos
7
6,699
7,517
12.2
Senegal
4
3,347
3,708
10.8
% Viral load suppression
Nicaragua
5
51
83
62.1
Cameroon
142
78
90
15.6
Mozambique
563
82
88
7.6
Panama
8
73
77
6.5
Guatemala
8
83
88
6.3
Côte d'Ivoire
490
84
88
5.6
Democratic Republic of the Congo
510
88
93
5.2
Honduras
6
85
90
5.1
Malawi64189934.7

Abbreviations: ART  = antiretroviral therapy; PLHIV = persons living with HIV; UNAIDS = Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; WHO = World Health Organization.

* Percent change in number of HIV-positive test results, persons with HIV on antiretroviral treatment, and percentage with viral load suppression.

† Number of persons who received a positive HIV test result. https://datim.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000084446-MER-Indicator-Reference-Guides

§ Number of adults and children who are currently receiving ART in accordance with the nationally approved treatment protocol (or WHO/UNAIDS standards) at the end of the reporting period. https://datim.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000084446-MER-Indicator-Reference-Guides

¶ Percentage of viral load suppression. Only sites in the highest quartile in both prepandemic (January–March 2020) and pandemic (October–December 2020) periods are included. Thirty-four of the 41 countries were included; seven countries did not report data for the viral load indicator.

Abbreviations: ART  = antiretroviral therapy; PLHIV = persons living with HIV; UNAIDS = Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; WHO = World Health Organization. * Percent change in number of HIV-positive test results, persons with HIV on antiretroviral treatment, and percentage with viral load suppression. † Number of persons who received a positive HIV test result. https://datim.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000084446-MER-Indicator-Reference-Guides § Number of adults and children who are currently receiving ART in accordance with the nationally approved treatment protocol (or WHO/UNAIDS standards) at the end of the reporting period. https://datim.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000084446-MER-Indicator-Reference-Guides ¶ Percentage of viral load suppression. Only sites in the highest quartile in both prepandemic (January–March 2020) and pandemic (October–December 2020) periods are included. Thirty-four of the 41 countries were included; seven countries did not report data for the viral load indicator. Review of quarterly aggregate MER narrative reports among countries in the upper quartile of positive HIV tests reported and case finding approaches attributed success to enhancing index testing and community- and home-based testing approaches tailored to geographic locations and populations at increased risk for HIV. Country programs in the upper quartile for increases in HIV treatment during the analytic time frame were associated with policy shifts toward multimonth dispensing of HIV treatment; streamlining facility visits (e.g., appointment spacing); facilitating community, peer, and home ART delivery options; improvements in data systems and management processes (e.g., patient tracking and tracing and site-level monitoring); and the use of telecommunication methods for improving client services. Gains in HIV viral load suppression among upper quartile programs were attributed to addressing a backlog of sample testing associated with the shifting priorities early in COVID-19 responses and reagent stockouts as well as improved patient monitoring and data quality. Tracking and tracing efforts among PLHIV with elevated viremia and aligning viral load testing with medication pick-up were reported as strategies to improve rates of viral load suppression.

Discussion

During 2020, many countries experienced disruptions to routine health care service delivery and challenges with infrastructure, human resources, and medical supplies as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Early estimates projected negative pandemic-related impacts on HIV service delivery (). This report highlights the capacity of PEPFAR-supported countries to adapt HIV programs to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly related to gains in HIV treatment and viral load suppression. Strategies reported among countries with gains in HIV programming included finding effective ways to reduce the frequency and duration of facility visits; streamlining service provision through community approaches, telecommunications, or messaging services; and enhancing quality and use of MER data and improving data systems for program improvement. PLHIV who are receiving ART experience less severe outcomes related to COVID-19 infection than do those who are not receiving ART (,), making access to HIV testing and treatment services critically important as the COVID-19 pandemic continues. Countries reporting increases in identifying new HIV infections attributed accomplishments to increasing community- and home-based testing and index testing approaches. Case finding efforts based on community-based and index testing have historically provided opportunities for early identification of PLHIV and reaching persons outside of facility settings (,). Scaling up community-based testing during the COVID-19 pandemic might have helped relieve some of the strain on health care infrastructure by reducing the overall number of persons visiting facilities for HIV testing services. Gains in identification of new HIV-positive persons was reported by the lowest percentage (39%) of countries, compared with gains in HIV treatment (88%) and viral load suppression (85%), in line with PEPFAR recommendations*** to focus efforts on retaining known PLHIV on treatment. HIV treatment gains were reported from a variety of programmatic strategies, including facility-, community-, peer-, and telecommunications-based approaches; improved data use related to patient tracking and tracing activities; and site-level monitoring. Facilities reported activities that reduced onsite attendance such as community home delivery models. Multimonth dispensing of ART, a strategy known to be successful in providing ART to PLHIV among countries affected by COVID-19 (), was also used by PEPFAR programs. Reports of viral load testing coverage being negatively affected across PEPFAR-supported countries early in the COVID-19 pandemic have been described (). Countries were able to align laboratory services with current SARS-CoV-2 testing needs to provide increases in HIV viral load testing activities over time (); several countries were able to regain losses in viral load testing coverage, as well as show gains in viral load suppression, by focusing on tracking and tracing efforts among PLHIV with high levels of viremia, addressing stockout and testing backlog challenges, and aligning viral load testing with medication pickup. The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, data are cross-sectional and reported quarterly in aggregate, precluding the ability to monitor and track persons across time. Second, data quality varies across country programs, and narrative reports were not systematically collected. Third, timing of the effect of COVID-19 on SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity and implemented mitigation measures has varied at the country level. The time frame selected for this analysis covers all reporting quarters within the calendar year to account for COVID-19 pandemic fluctuations and precedes any possible effects related to national COVID-19 vaccination rollout. Fourth, country context can affect overall results based on the capacity to adapt local infrastructures and to make programmatic shifts, including program approaches and strategies, or changes in implementing partners. To reduce the potential effects of programmatic shifts, only PEPFAR-supported facilities that reported data during both periods were included in the analysis. Finally, some countries are reaching HIV epidemic control and therefore might not have had extensive programmatic improvements, and the maintenance of those gains would not have been reflected in positive percent change in indicators. Given that lower percent change did not inherently represent reductions in program performance, the narrative analysis was restricted to countries in the upper quartile of percent change during the specified time frame. The number of sites ranged widely among countries; however, the numbers are proportional to the country size and PEPFAR ART program. Although this variation might have affected the magnitude of overall percent change across indicators, particularly in the smallest programs, the direction of change provided valuable information in assessing programmatic gains across the HIV care continuum. Qualitative data were reviewed from countries that reported the highest percentage of programmatic gains to help identify specific strategies that might have improved HIV service delivery, considering the stress placed on HIV programs as countries worked toward mitigating SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Programs can learn from these strategies and assess their implementation feasibility to help develop sustainable activities as well as adapt programs during a global health crisis. These findings demonstrate how community- and home-based approaches, in conjunction with improving data use for program improvement, can effectively reduce facility visits in PEPFAR-supported countries and therefore help mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission while preserving life-saving services for PLHIV.

What is already known about the topic?

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected health care infrastructure worldwide.

What is added by this report?

In 41 U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)–supported countries, overall gains were observed in HIV treatment (5%) and viral load suppression (2%) during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Among countries with the largest overall programmatic gains, strategies that facilitated HIV program improvements included enhanced index testing and community- and home-based testing; multimonth dispensing of medications; streamlining clinic visits; aligning medication pick-up with viral load testing; and improvements in data use.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Lessons learned from PEPFAR-supported countries reporting the most programmatic progress in HIV programs provide important insights into strategies that can be used to realize programmatic gains during a global health crisis.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of community and facility-based HIV testing to address linkage to care gaps in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Monisha Sharma; Roger Ying; Gillian Tarr; Ruanne Barnabas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The COVID-19 pandemic as a catalyst for differentiated care models to end the HIV epidemic in the United States: applying lessons from high-burden settings.

Authors:  Lauren F Collins; Jonathan A Colasanti; Minh L Nguyen; Caitlin A Moran; Cecile D Lahiri; Vince C Marconi; Wendy S Armstrong; N Sarita Shah
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  COVID-19 Severity and COVID-19-Associated Deaths Among Hospitalized Patients with HIV Infection - Zambia, March-December 2020.

Authors:  Duncan Chanda; Peter A Minchella; Davies Kampamba; Megumi Itoh; Jonas Z Hines; Sombo Fwoloshi; Mary Adetinuke Boyd; Kalongo Hamusonde; Lameck Chirwa; Kotey Nikoi; Robert Chirwa; Mpanji Siwingwa; Suilanji Sivile; Khozya D Zyambo; Aggrey Mweemba; Nyuma Mbewe; Katongo H Mutengo; Kennedy Malama; Simon Agolory; Lloyd B Mulenga
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study.

Authors:  Alexandra B Hogan; Britta L Jewell; Ellie Sherrard-Smith; Juan F Vesga; Oliver J Watson; Charles Whittaker; Arran Hamlet; Jennifer A Smith; Peter Winskill; Robert Verity; Marc Baguelin; John A Lees; Lilith K Whittles; Kylie E C Ainslie; Samir Bhatt; Adhiratha Boonyasiri; Nicholas F Brazeau; Lorenzo Cattarino; Laura V Cooper; Helen Coupland; Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg; Amy Dighe; Bimandra A Djaafara; Christl A Donnelly; Jeff W Eaton; Sabine L van Elsland; Richard G FitzJohn; Han Fu; Katy A M Gaythorpe; William Green; David J Haw; Sarah Hayes; Wes Hinsley; Natsuko Imai; Daniel J Laydon; Tara D Mangal; Thomas A Mellan; Swapnil Mishra; Gemma Nedjati-Gilani; Kris V Parag; Hayley A Thompson; H Juliette T Unwin; Michaela A C Vollmer; Caroline E Walters; Haowei Wang; Yuanrong Wang; Xiaoyue Xi; Neil M Ferguson; Lucy C Okell; Thomas S Churcher; Nimalan Arinaminpathy; Azra C Ghani; Patrick G T Walker; Timothy B Hallett
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 26.763

5.  Notes from the Field: Impact of the COVID-19 Response on Scale-Up of HIV Viral Load Testing - PEPFAR-Supported Countries, January-June 2020.

Authors:  Shirley Lee Lecher; Mary Naluguza; Christina Mwangi; Jonathan N'tale; Dianna Edgil; George Alemnji; Heather Alexander
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 6.  HIV/SARS-CoV-2 coinfection: A global perspective.

Authors:  Osman N Kanwugu; Parise Adadi
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 20.693

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.