| Literature DB >> 35324762 |
Ernesto Infusino1, Ilaria Guagliardi2, Simona Gaglioti1, Tommaso Caloiero2.
Abstract
Knowledge of spring waters' chemical composition is paramount for both their use and their conservation. Vast surveys at the basin scale are required to define the nature and the location of the springs and to identify the hydrochemical facies of their aquifers. The present study aims to evaluate the hydrochemical facies and the vulnerability to nitrates of 59 springs falling in the Sila Massif in Calabria (southern Italy) and to identify their vulnerability through the analysis of physicochemical parameters and the use of the Langelier-Ludwig diagram. A spatial analysis was performed by the spline method. The results identified a mean value of 4.39 mg NO3-/L and a maximum value of 24 mg NO3-/L for nitrate pollution in the study area. Statistical analysis results showed that the increase in electrical conductivity follows the increase in alkalinity values, a correlation especially evident in the bicarbonate Ca-Mg waters and linked to the possibility of higher nitrate concentrations in springs. These analyses also showed that nitrate vulnerability is dependent on the geological setting of springs. Indeed, the Sila igneous-metamorphic batholith, often strongly affected by weathering processes, contributes to not buffering the nitrate impacts on aquifers. Conversely, anthropogenic activities, particularly fertilization practices, are key factors in groundwater vulnerability.Entities:
Keywords: correlation; hydrogeochemical characterization; nitrate vulnerability; spring waters; statistical analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35324762 PMCID: PMC8950697 DOI: 10.3390/toxics10030137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxics ISSN: 2305-6304
Figure 1Map of the geographical and geological setting of the study area, with the locations of the samples.
Basic statistics for analyzed water parameters.
| Parameter | Min | Max | Mean | Median | Lower Quartile | Upper Quartile | Standard Deviation | Skewness | Kurtosis | CV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 5.46 | 8.6 | 6.86 | 6.82 | 6.5 | 7.24 | 0.58 | 0.36 | 0.51 | 8.48 |
| EC (µS/cm) | 51.3 | 710.61 | 179.37 | 152 | 102.9 | 236 | 110.7 | 2.2 | 8.13 | 61.72 |
| H (°f) | 2.01 | 33.6 | 7.7 | 6 | 3.7 | 9.8 | 5.5 | 2.23 | 7.7 | 71.35 |
| TDS (mg/L) | 0.12 | 533 | 132.73 | 113 | 78.11 | 175.9 | 83.97 | 2.1 | 7.92 | 63.27 |
| Ca2+ (mg/L) | 3.61 | 110 | 16.42 | 14.4 | 8.61 | 20 | 14.53 | 4.77 | 29.92 | 88.48 |
| Mg2+ (mg/L) | 0.97 | 20.47 | 7.92 | 6.8 | 3.1 | 12.07 | 5.5 | 0.6 | −0.81 | 69.7 |
| K+ (mg/L) | 0.009 | 2.92 | 1.46 | 1.56 | 1.1 | 1.85 | 0.55 | −0.3 | 0.25 | 37.3 |
| Na+ (mg/L) | 4.51 | 59 | 11.27 | 9.05 | 6.96 | 12.5 | 8.3 | 3.87 | 19.25 | 73.7 |
| HCO3− (mg/L) | 8 | 209.82 | 63.08 | 35.12 | 17 | 98.94 | 56.99 | 0.97 | −0.11 | 90.34 |
| Cl− (mg/L) | 7.80 | 85.12 | 18.07 | 14.9 | 10.72 | 21.14 | 11.97 | 3.62 | 17.41 | 66.26 |
| SO42− (mg/L) | 0.07 | 25 | 2.08 | 0.6 | 0.31 | 0.9 | 4.52 | 3.67 | 14.66 | 216.62 |
| NO3− (mg/L) | 0.06 | 24 | 4.38 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 5.65 | 5.38 | 2.14 | 5 | 124.11 |
CV (%) = coefficient of variation; EC = electrical conductivity; H = hardness; TDS = total dissolved solutes.
Figure 2Bivariate plots of TDS (a), H (b), EC (c) and A (d) vs. altitude.
Figure 3Bivariate plots of IA vs. EC (a) Bivariate plots of IA vs. EC and (b) IA classification of the spring waters according to geology.
Pearson correlation coefficients for analyzed parameters.
| EC | TDS | pH | H | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | Na+ | K+ | Cl− | SO42− | NO3− | A | Altitude | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC |
| ||||||||||||
| TDS |
|
| |||||||||||
| pH | 0.11 | 0.08 |
| ||||||||||
| H |
|
| 0.12 |
| |||||||||
| Ca2+ |
|
| 0.17 |
|
| ||||||||
| Mg2+ |
|
| 0.14 |
|
|
| |||||||
| Na+ |
|
| 0.01 | 0.47 | 0.45 |
|
| ||||||
| K+ |
|
| 0.05 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.23 |
| |||||
| Cl− |
|
| −0.04 |
|
| 0.33 |
|
|
| ||||
| SO42− | 0.32 | 0.32 | −0.08 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.18 |
| −0.03 | 0.22 |
| |||
| NO3− |
|
| −0.10 | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.29 |
| 0.33 |
| 0.26 |
| ||
| A | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.15 | 0.48 | 0.41 |
|
| −0.11 | −0.07 | 0.37 | 0.02 |
| |
| Altitude |
|
| 0.05 |
| −0.48 |
| −0.43 |
|
| −0.15 | −0.43 | −0.16 |
|
Coefficients are significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed), and those higher than 0.5 are shown in bold.
Figure 4Langelier–Ludwig (LL) diagram (a) and classification of the spring waters (LL quadrants) according to geology (b).
Figure 5(a) Correlations between EC and A, (b) Na+ and Cl− and (c) NO3− and altitude according to classification of water springs in LL diagram.
Mean concentrations of NH4+, NO2− and NO3− detected in the three sampling sites.
| Measurement Site | Coordinates | NH4+ | NO2− | NO3− |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sant’Antonello in Montalto Uffugo | 39°28′47″ N | 0.8296 | 0.0462 | 3.3287 |
| 16°14′28″ E | ||||
| Settimo in Montalto Uffugo | 39°25′15″ N | 0.6304 | 0.0150 | 1.1121 |
| 16°12′38″ E | ||||
| Bonis | 39°28′50″ N | 2.1325 | 0.0249 | 1.8664 |
| 16°30′12″ E |
Figure 6Spatial distribution of nitrates in the study area.