| Literature DB >> 35324731 |
Jessica Nguyen1, Arjun Patel2, Andrew Gensburg3, Rehman Bokhari3, Peter Lamar4, Joshua Edwards4.
Abstract
Studies show an association between cadmium (Cd) exposure and prediabetes or type II diabetes mellitus. We have previously reported that Cd causes decreased levels of serum leptin in rats following 12 weeks of daily Cd dosing (0.6 mg/kg/b.w./day). Since leptin plays an important role in metabolism, we examined the effects of Cd on rats and db/db mice, which are deficient in leptin receptor activity. We gave rats and mice daily subcutaneous injections of saline (control) or CdCl2 at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg of Cd for 2 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of no dosing. At the end of the 4-week study, exposure to Cd resulted in a more rapid increase in blood glucose levels following an oral glucose tolerance test in db/db vs. lean mice. During the two weeks of no Cd dosing, individual rat bodyweight gain was greater (p ≤ 0.05) in Cd-treated animals. At this time point, the combined epididymal and retroperitoneal fat pad weight was significantly greater (p ≤ 0.05) in the Cd-treated lean mice compared to saline-treated controls. Although this pilot study had relatively low N values (4 per treatment group for mice and 6 for rats) the results show that clinically relevant levels of Cd exposure resulted in diabetogenic as well as obesogenic effects.Entities:
Keywords: cadmium; db/db mouse; diabetes mellitus; leptin; obesity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35324731 PMCID: PMC8949435 DOI: 10.3390/toxics10030107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxics ISSN: 2305-6304
Levels of metals in renal cortex (µg/g wet weight) after 2 weeks of 0.6 mg/kg/b.w./day of Cd dosing and 2 subsequent weeks of no Cd dosing; control animals received equal volume vehicle (saline) injections. Asterisk (*) indicate significant differences between control vs. cadmium treatment groups for whole data set; a = significant differences compared to Cd treatment within the same species/strain. All data are expressed as mean ± standard error µg/g wet weight. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-tests test; p ≤ 0.05; n = 4 per group for mice and n = 6 for rats per group.
| Boron | Cadmium | Calcium | Copper | Iron | Magnesium | Manganese | Molybdenum | Phosphorus | Potassium | Sodium | Zinc * | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control lean mouse | 12.8 ± 6.5 | a 0.82 ± 0.33 | 121 ± 44 | 5.62 ± 1.0 | 81.5 ± 10 | 255 ± 19 | 2.02 ± 0.24 | 0.88 ± 0.3 | 4373 ± 279 | 5271 ± 433 | 1290 ± 150 | 41.0 ± 5.9 |
| Cadmium lean mouse | 7.73 ± 1.1 | 45.4 ± 3.6 | 91.1 ± 3.0 | 5.72 ± 0.52 | 74.2 ± 7.6 | 260 ± 13 | 2.14 ± 0.05 | 0.68 ± 0.04 | 4338 ± 239 | 5246 ± 411 | 1305 ± 143 | 45.0 ± 2.6 |
| Control db/db mouse | 4.28 ± 0.61 | a 0.4 ± 0.04 | 81.2 ± 2.7 | 5.1 ± 0.17 | 68.2 ± 5.6 | 243 ± 8.4 | 1.81 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.02 | 3938 ± 100 | 4797 ± 277 | 1080 ± 111 | 32 ± 0.41 |
| Cadmium db/db mouse | 4.88 ± 1.0 | 46.3 ± 5.7 | 91.9 ± 16 | 5.87 ± 0.43 | 82.2 ± 7.5 | 246 ± 7.1 | 1.96 ± 0.08 | 0.80 ± 0.07 | 3983 ± 125 | 4944 ± 385 | 1157 ± 140 | 46.7 ± 4.8 |
| Control rat | 2.22 ± 0.38 | a 0.26 ± 0.07 | 89.5 ± 4.8 | a 7.42 ± 0.21 | 51.6 ± 4.4 | 212 ± 5.8 | 0.95 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.05 | 3281 ± 83 | 3691 ± 172 | 1026 ± 38 | 31.1 ± 2.1 |
| Cadmium rat | 2.59 ± 0.66 | 71.24 ± 2.9 | 83.7 ± 7.3 | 22.8 ± 1.8 | 53.6 ± 7.2 | 194 ± 3.7 | 0.92 ± 0.02 | 0.52 ± 0.12 | 3059 ± 57 | 3425 ± 89 | 1100 ± 58 | 42.3 ± 2.3 |
Figure 1OGTT data following two weeks of 0.6 mg/kg/b.w./day of Cd dosing and two subsequent weeks of no Cd dosing for db/db mice (A), lean mice (B) and rats (C). No statistically significant changes were detected; however, all but one db/db mouse administered Cd had blood glucose levels that exceeded the 600 mg/dL at the 30 min time point, the upper limit of the measuring range of the vsglucose meter (dotted line). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-tests test; p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant; N = 4 per group for mice and N = 6 for rats per group; data are mean ± SE.
Figure 2Serum leptin levels following two weeks of 0.6 mg/kg/b.w./day of Cd dosing and two subsequent weeks of no Cd dosing. Asterisk (*) indicates significant differences between saline control and Cd-treated db/db mice. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-tests test; p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant; N = 4 per group for mice and N = 6 for rats per group; data are mean ± SE.
Figure 3Changes in individual body weight during two weeks of 0.6 mg/kg/b.w./day of Cd dosing and two subsequent weeks of no Cd dosing for db/db mice (A), lean mice (B) and rats (C). Data are percentage of weight gain in Cd-treated animals relative to age-matched saline-treated control animals. Time point “0” is when the last Cd dose was administered. Asterisk (*) indicates significant differences between Cd-treated and week-matched control animals using non-percentage weekly weight gain data. When grouped by control vs. Cd-treatment, the db/db mice (A) showed significant differences; however, the multiple comparisons post hoc tests did not show significant differences at any specific time point. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-tests test; p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant; N = 4 per group for mice and N = 6 for rats per group; data are mean ± SE. Note that the deviation in body weight only occurred after Cd dosing had stopped or at time point “0”.
Figure 4Changes in fat pad weights (epidydimal and retroperitoneal) after two weeks of 0.6 mg/kg/b.w./day of Cd dosing and two subsequent weeks of no Cd dosing for db/db mice (A), lean mice (B) and rats (C). Time point “0” is when last Cd dose was administered. Asterisk (*) indicates significant differences between Cd-treated and control animals. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-tests test; p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant; N = 4 per group for mice and N = 6 for rats per group; data are mean ± SE.