| Literature DB >> 35324730 |
Peipei Zhang1,2,3,4, Xiuxian Song1,2,3,4, Yue Zhang1,2, Jianan Zhu1,2,4, Huihui Shen1,2,3,4, Zhiming Yu1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Blooms of the toxic dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi could threaten the survival of marine life, and modified clay (MC) is considered a promising method for the control of harmful algal blooms. Here, using marine medaka as the model organism, the toxicity of K. mikimotoi before and after MC disposal was investigated. The results showed that only a certain density of intact K. mikimotoi cells could cause obvious damage to fish gills and lead to rapid death. A systematic analysis of morphology, physiology, and molecular biology parameters revealed that the fish gills exhibited structural damage, oxidative damage, osmotic regulation impairment, immune response activation, and signal transduction enhancement. MC can flocculate K. mikimotoi rapidly in water and reduce its toxicity by reducing the density of intact algae cells and hemolytic toxicity. The results indicate that MC is an effective and safe method for controlling K. mikimotoi blooms.Entities:
Keywords: Karenia mikimotoi; harmful algal bloom; marine medaka; marine toxicity tests; modified clay
Year: 2022 PMID: 35324730 PMCID: PMC8949556 DOI: 10.3390/toxics10030105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxics ISSN: 2305-6304
Figure 1The effect of MC on the cell morphology of K. mikimotoi. (A) Morphology of the normal algal cell. (B) Morphology of the residual algal cells exposed by MC. (C) Morphology of the algae cells flocculated exposed by MC.
The relationship between hemolytic toxicity and the cell density of K. mikimotoi.
| Correlations | Algal Cell Density | Hemolytic Toxicity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Algal cell density | Pearson Correlation | 1 | 0.974 ** |
| Sig.(2-tailed) | 0.000 | ||
| N | 18 | 18 | |
**. Correlation is significant at 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Figure 2Changes of hemolytic toxicity of residual algal cells.
The effects of different components of K. mikimotoi on the survival of marine medaka.
| Time (h) | Intact Algal Cell Density (Cells/mL) | 3000 Cells/mL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1000 | 3000 | 5000 | 10000 | The Cell-Free Culture Supernatant | The Ruptured Cell Suspension | |
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
indicates all were alive, indicates some were alive, indicates all were dead.
Figure 3Surface morphology of the gills of different groups of marine medaka. (A1–A3) Surface. morphology of the normal gills in SW group. (B1–B3) Surface morphology of the gills exposed by MC. (C1–C3) Surface morphology of the gills exposed to K. mikimotoi. (D1–D3) Surface morphology of gills exposed in the KMMC group for 3 h. (E1–E3) Surface morphology of the gills exposed to KMMC for 24 h.
Figure 4Changes in the biochemical and physiological indexes of different groups of marine medaka. (A) NKA activity, (B) SOD activity, (C) CAT activity, and (D) MDA content; * significant difference compared with SW group at p < 0.05.
Figure 5The number of DEGs in fish gills in each treatment group. (A) The numbers of up-regulated genes and down-regulated genes in each treatment group. (B) Venn diagram.
Figure 6Catalogues of DEGs in biological process, cellular component, and molecular function items.
Figure 7KEGG pathways of marine medaka gills in different treatment groups, p < 0.05 is significant.
Figure 8Correlation analysis between RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR validation results of genes.