| Literature DB >> 35324706 |
José Carlos Rodríguez Tito1, Liliana Maria Gomez Luna1,2, Wim Noppe Noppe3, Inaudis Alvarez Hubert4.
Abstract
The factors related to cyanotoxin occurrence and its social impact, with comprehension and risk perception being the most important issues, are not yet completely understood in the Cuban context. The objectives of this research were to determine the risk extension and microcystin-LR levels, and to identify the environmental factors that trigger the toxic cyanobacteria growth and microcystin-LR occurrence in 24 water reservoirs in eastern Cuba. Samplings were performed in the early morning hours, with in situ determination and physicochemical analysis carried out in the laboratory. Microcystin-LR were determined in water and within the cells (intracellular toxins) using UPLC-MS analysis after solid phase extraction. The reservoirs studied were found to be affected by eutrophication, with high levels of TN:TP ratio and phytoplankton cell concentrations, high water temperatures and low transparency, which cause collateral effect such as cyanobacterial bloom and microcystin-LR occurrence. In Hatillo, Chalóns, Parada, Mícara, Baraguá, Cautillo, La Yaya, Guisa and Jaibo reservoirs, concentrations of MC-LR higher than the WHO limits for drinking water (1 µg·L-1), were detected.Entities:
Keywords: TN:TP; UPLC–MS; cyanobacteria; microcystin-LR; water reservoir
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35324706 PMCID: PMC8952431 DOI: 10.3390/toxins14030209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Physicochemical analysis in the studied reservoirs in eastern Cuba.
Figure 2Total nutrient concentrations in the studied reservoirs in eastern Cuba.
Figure 3Cyanobacteria cell concentration in 24 studied reservoirs at the eastern of Cuba.
Microcystin-LR concentration in studied water reservoirs in eastern Cuba; ND: not detected; bold = concentration higher than 1 µg·L−1.
| Reservoirs | MC-LR | MC-LR |
|---|---|---|
| Céspedes | 0.04 | ND |
| Gilbert | 0.10 | ND |
| Gota Blanca | 0.19 | ND |
| Hatillo |
|
|
| Charco Mono | ND | 0.015 |
| Chalóns |
|
|
| Parada |
|
|
| Mícara |
|
|
| Joturo | 0.35 | ND |
| Baraguá |
|
|
| Camazán | 0.14 | ND |
| Bio | 0.20 | 0.06 |
| Cauto el Paso | ND | ND |
| Guisa | 0.95 |
|
| Bueycito | 0.53 | 0.21 |
| Paso Malo | ND | ND |
| Cautillo |
|
|
| La Yaya |
|
|
| Jaibo | 0.83 |
|
| Clotilde | ND | ND |
| Los Plátanos | ND | ND |
| Moa | ND | ND |
| Nipe | ND | ND |
| Gibara | ND | ND |
Correlation of biotic and abiotic parameters in the 24 water reservoirs. (* = significant at p < 0.05; ** = significant at p < 0.01; *** = significant at p < 0.001). Water Temp (Temperature); Air Temp (Air Temperature); Cond (Conductivity); DO (Dissolved Oxygen; Chl a (Chlorophyll a); Secchi (Transparency); Phyto (Phytoplankton concentration cells); Cyano (Cyanobacteria concentration cells); Phyco (Phycocyanin); TN (Total nitrogen); TP (Total phosphorus); MC-LR Water (MC-LR concentration in water); MC-LR Intrac (intracellular MC-LR concentration).
| Air | Cond | DO | pH | Chl | Secchi | Phyto | Cyano | Phyco | TN | TP | MC-LR Water | MC-LR Intrac | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water temp | 0.77 | −0.21 | −0.51 | 0.12 | −0.26 | −0.41 * | 0.37 * | 0.09 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.38 * | 0.08 | 0.30 |
| Air temp | - | 0.08 | −0.37 * | 0.01 | −0.20 | −0.25 | 0.47 * | 0.06 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.50 * | −0.11 | −0.28 |
| Cond | - | 0.19 | 0.08 | −0.45 * | 0.36 * | −0.29 | −0.46 * | −0.31 | −0.10 | −0.31 | 0.14 | −0.03 | |
| DO | - | −0.29 | −0.23 | 0.41 * | −0.26 | 0.09 | −0.36 * | 0.03 | −0.12 | 0.01 | −0.26 | ||
| pH | - | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.26 | −0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | −0.60 * | −0.38 | |||
| Chl | - | 0.41 * | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.36 * | −0.17 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.38 | ||||
| Secchi | - | −0.27 | −0.15 | −0.12 | 0.01 | −0.39 | −0.13 | 0.01 | |||||
| Phyto | - | 0.53 ** | 0.39 * | 0.16 | 0.42 * | −0.43 * | −0.40 | ||||||
| Cyano | - | 0.16 | 0.39 * | 0.28 | −0.62 ** | −0.55 * | |||||||
| Phyto | - | −0.19 | 0.37 * | 0.25 | 0.14 | ||||||||
| TN | - | 0.39 * | −0.67 ** | −0.37 | |||||||||
| TP | - | −0.18 | −0.26 | ||||||||||
| MC-LR water | - | 0.91 |
Figure 4Principal component analysis (PCA) of different environmental variable measures in 24 reservoirs in eastern Cuba.
Figure 5Localization of the selected reservoirs for the study, and associated watersheds.
Figure 6Calibration curve for microcystin-LR (MC-LR) analysis with UPLC–MS.