| Literature DB >> 35323815 |
Xiaofeng Fang1,2, Shihao Wei1, Shuai Liu1, Ruo Li1, Ziyi Zhang1, Yanbiao Liu1,3, Xingran Zhang1, Mengmeng Lou1, Gang Chen1,3, Fang Li1,3.
Abstract
Metal-phenol coordination is a widely used method to prepare nanofiltration membrane. However, the facile, controllable and scaled fabrication remains a great challenge. Herein, a novel strategy was developed to fabricate a loose nanofiltration membrane via integrating blending and interfacial coordination strategy. Specifically, iron acetylacetonate was firstly blended in Polyether sulfone (PES) substrate via non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS), and then the loose selective layer was formed on the membrane surface with tannic acid (TA) crosslinking reaction with Fe3+. The surface properties, morphologies, permeability and selectivity of the membranes were carefully investigated. The introduction of TA improved the surface hydrophilicity and negative charge. Moreover, the thickness of top layer increased about from ~30 nm to 119 nm with the increase of TA assembly time. Under the optimum preparation condition, the membrane with assembly 3 h (PES/Fe-TA3h) showed pure water flux of 175.8 L·m-2·h-1, dye rejections of 97.7%, 97.1% and 95.0% for Congo red (CR), Methyl blue (MB) and Eriochrome Black T (EBT), along with a salt penetration rate of 93.8%, 95.1%, 97.4% and 98.1% for Na2SO4, MgSO4, NaCl and MgCl2 at 0.2 MPa, respectively. Both static adhesion tests and dynamic fouling experiments implied that the TA modified membranes showed significantly reduced adsorption and high FRR for the dye solutions separation. The PES/Fe-TA3h membrane exhibited high FRR of 90.3%, 87.5% and 81.6% for CR, EBT and MB in the fouling test, stable CR rejection (>97.2%) and NaCl permeation (>94.6%) in 24 h continuous filtration test. The combination of blending and interfacial coordination assembly method could be expected to be a universal way to fabricate the loose nanofiltration membrane for effective fractionation of dyes and salts in the saline textile wastewater.Entities:
Keywords: antifouling; dye/salt separation; metal-coordination; nanofiltration; polyphenol
Year: 2022 PMID: 35323815 PMCID: PMC8954445 DOI: 10.3390/membranes12030340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Figure 1Schematic diagram of cross-flow experimental device: 1. Feed liquid; 2. Peristaltic pump; 3. Pressure gauge; 4. Membrane assembly; 5. Measured film; 6. Penetrating fluid.
Figure 2Schematic representation of the fabrication process of loss nanofiltration membrane and selective separation of dye and salt.
Figure 3(a) Digital photographs of membrane surface, (b) TGA curves and (c) ATR-FTIR spectra of the PES, PES/Fe and PES/Fe-TA membrane.
Figure 4(a) The water contact angle and (b) zeta potentials of the PES, PES/Fe and PES/Fe-TA membranes.
Figure 5The surface (a–d) and cross section morphology (e–h) of PES/Fe-TA membranes with different TA assembly times.
Figure 6The pure water flux and CR rejection of PES/Fe-TA membrane at different TA assembly times.
Figure 7(a) Filtration performance of single dye solution, (b) rejections of salts, (c) filtration performance for the dye/salt mixture solution for the PES/Fe-TA3h membrane and (d) photographs of feed and penetration solutions.
Comparison of the performance of the NF membranes in the literature.
| Membranes | Permeate Flux | Congo Red | NaCl | Pressure (MPa) | Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C(g/L) | R(%) | C(g/L) | R(%) | ||||
|
|
| 0.1 | 99.8 | 1 | 17.2 | 0.2 | [ |
| TiO2-HMDI | 30.5 | 0.035 | 97.4 | 1 | 2.7 | 0.2 | [ |
| PSF/GO | 73.7–95.4 | 0.1 | 99.9 | 1 | <5 | 0.2 | [ |
| PAN-PEI-GA | 51.0 | 0.1 | 97.1 | 1 | 5 | 0.2 | [ |
| PAN-DR80 | 113.6 | 0.1 | 99.8 | 1 | 12.4 | 0.4 | [ |
| Fe(III)-phos-(PEI)/HPAN | 12.1 | 0.1 | 99.5 | 1 | 7.5 | 0.2 | [ |
| CaCO3/PEI-GA | 141 | 0.1 | 99.6 | 1 | 6.9 | 0.3 | [ |
| PST-1 | 52.3 | 0.1 | 99.0 | 1 | <7 | 0.6 | [ |
| TAIP M4 | 31.5 | 0.2 | 99.4 | 2 | 5.4 | 0.1 | [ |
| PDA/SBMA/HPAN | 68.8 | 0.5 | 98.2 | 1 | 5.0 | 0.4 | [ |
| LNFM-2 | 212.9 | 0.2 | 99.6 | 1 | 5.6 | 0.4 | [ |
| PES/Fe-TA3h | 77.0 | 0.1 | 97.7 | 2 | 2.6 | 0.2 | This work |
Figure 8The dye adsorption content (a) and digital photos of surface color (b) on PES, PES/Fe and PES/Fe-TA3h membranes with static adsorption for different dyes.
Figure 9(a) The time-dependent normalized flux during the filtration of CR, EBT and MB solution and (b) antifouling indexes for the PES/Fe-TA3h membrane.
Figure 10The long-term operation stability of the PES/Fe-TA3h membrane for the CR/NaCl mixture solution (feed: 0.1 g/L CR and 2 g/L NaCl).