| Literature DB >> 35323032 |
Maisha F Jabeen1,2, Nicholas D Sanderson3,2, Dona Foster3, Derrick W Crook3,2, Jennifer L Cane1,2, Catherine Borg1,2, Clare Connolly1,2, Samantha Thulborn1,2, Ian D Pavord1,2, Paul Klenerman4, Teresa L Street3,2, Timothy S C Hinks1,2.
Abstract
Previous metagenomic studies in asthma have been limited by inadequate sequencing depth for species-level bacterial identification and by heterogeneity in clinical phenotyping. We hypothesize that chronic bacterial airways infection is a key "treatable trait" whose prevalence, clinical phenotype and reliable biomarkers need definition. In this study, we have applied a method for Oxford Nanopore sequencing for the unbiased metagenomic characterization of severe asthma. We optimized methods to compare performance of Illumina MiSeq, Nanopore sequencing, and RT-qPCR on total sputum DNA extracts against culture/MALDI-TOF for analysis of induced sputum samples from highly phenotyped severe asthma during clinical stability. In participants with severe asthma (n = 23) H. influenzae was commonly cultured (n = 8) and identified as the dominant bacterial species by metagenomic sequencing using an optimized method for Illumina MiSeq and Oxford Nanopore. Alongside superior operational characteristics, Oxford Nanopore achieved near complete genome coverage of H. influenzae and demonstrated a high level of agreement with Illumina MiSeq data. Clinically significant infection was confirmed with validated H. influenzae plasmid-based quantitative PCR assay. H. influenzae positive patients were found to have sputum neutrophilia and lower FeNO. In conclusion, using an optimized method of direct sequencing of induced sputum samples, H. influenzae was identified as a clinically relevant pathogen in severe asthma and was identified reliably using metagenomic sequencing. Application of these protocols in ongoing analysis of large patient cohorts will allow full characterization of this clinical phenotype. IMPORTANCE The human airways were once thought sterile in health. Now metagenomic techniques suggest bacteria may be present, but their role in asthma is not understood. Traditional culture lacks sensitivity and current sequencing techniques are limited by operational problems and limited ability to identify pathogens at species level. We optimized a new sequencing technique-Oxford Nanopore technologies (ONT)-for use on human sputum samples and compared it with existing methods. We found ONT was effective for rapidly analyzing samples and could identify bacteria at the species level. We used this to show Haemophilus influenzae was a dominant bacterium in the airways in people with severe asthma. The presence of Haemophilus was associated with a "neutrophilic" form of asthma - a subgroup for which we currently lack specific treatments. Therefore, this technique could be used to target chronic antibiotic therapy and in research to characterize the full breadth of bacteria in the airways.Entities:
Keywords: Haemophilus influenzae; Illumina; Oxford Nanopore; asthma; bacteria; microbiome; sputum
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35323032 PMCID: PMC9045196 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02279-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Spectr ISSN: 2165-0497
Clinical characteristics and airway inflammatory cell parameters of participants according to presence of airway H. influenzae
| Characteristic | Severe asthma ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex, | 13 (57) | 9 (69) | 4 (31) | 0.66 |
| Age (yr), mean (SD) | 67 (10) | 69 (9) | 62 (10) | 0.07 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 28.4 (6.10) | 28.2 (6.20) | 28.8 (28.2) | 0.83 |
| Presence of atopy, | 11 (48) | 6 (55) | 5 (46) | 0.33 |
| Presence of nasal polyps, | 7 (30) | 4 (57) | 3 (43) | 0.61 |
| Ex-smoker, | 12 (52) | 7 (58) | 5 (42) | 0.49 |
| Pack yr, mean (SD) | 12 (10) | 11 (6) | 14 (15) | 0.62 |
| Baseline inhaled corticosteroid use (BDP eq., mcg/d), median (Range) | 2,000 (1,700) | 2,000 (1,700) | 2,000 (1,200) | 0.97 |
| Maintenance oral corticosteroid, | 9 (39) | 8 (89) | 1 (11) | 0.06 |
| Unscheduled GP/hospital visits in 12 mo, median (range) | 4 (7) | 4 (5) | 5 (6) | 0.79 |
| Corticosteroid courses in 12 mo, median (range) | 3 (10) | 2 (10) | 3 (9) | 0.84 |
| Antibiotic courses in 12 mo, median (range) | 0 (7) | 0 (7) | 2 (6) | 0.4 |
| FEV1 (% predicted), mean (SD) | 69.6 (16.8) | 69.9 (15.1) | 68.9 (20.8) | 0.58 |
| FEV1/FVC, mean (SD) | 0.58 (0.10) | 0.56 (0.10) | 0.62 (0.10) | 0.21 |
| FeNO (ppb), mean (SD) | 62 (68) | 75 (74) | 40 (53) | 0.26 |
| Blood eosinophils (×109/L), mean (SD) | 0.50 (0.44) | 0.53 (0.35) | 0.45 (0.58) | 0.56 |
| Sputum eosinophils (%), median (range) | 0.50 (23) | 1 (23) | 0.10 (2) |
|
| Sputum neutrophils (%), median (range) | 72 (79) | 54 (65) | 93 (37) |
|
| Sputum inflammatory phenotype, | ||||
| Total with valid data | 21 | 13 | 8 | |
| Eosinophilic | 5 (24) | 5 (38) | 0 (0) | |
| Neutrophilic | 13 (62) | 5 (38) | 8 (0) | |
| Mixed granulocytic | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Paucigranulocytic | 3 (14) | 3 (23) | 0 (0) |
BMI, body mass index; GP, general practitioner; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1s; FVC, forced vital capacity; FeNO, exhaled nitric oxide; 1. Percentages given are provided from subjects with valid daata; Inflammatory phenotyes: eosinophilic >3% sputum eosinophils, neutrophilic >61% sputum neutrophils and <3% eosinophils, mixed granulocytic >61% sputum neutrophils and >3% eosinophils, paucigranulocytic <61% sputum neutrophils and <3% eosinophils.
Comparisons between groups made using unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney test. P values < 0.05 are highlighted in bold.
FIG 1Presence of H. influenzae is associated with sputum neutrophilia; sputum differential cell counts stratified by presence or absence of H. influenzae by Oxford Nanopore sequencing and quantitative PCR. Statistical significance of eosinophil: neutrophil ratio assessed by Mann-Whitney test (P = 0.03).
Summary of sputum microbiology; pilot data (n = 23), sputum differential (neutrophilia >61%, eosinophilia >3%), FeNO (high: >45 ppb), culture, MALDI-TOF speciation, DNA sequencing by Oxford Nanopore; RT-qPCR for Eubacteria 16S and specific pathogens: H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae, M. catarrhalis, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus (positive >1 × 106 copies/mL)
| PID | Age (yrs) | Sex | Smoking status (pack yrs) | H. inf qPCR (×106 copies/mL) | S. pneu qPCR (×106 copies/mL) | M. cat qPCR (×106 copies/mL) | P. aeru qPCR (×106 copies/mL) | S. aur qPCR (×106 copies/mL) | Total 16S qPCR (×106 copies/mL) | Sputum neutrophils (%) | Sputum eosinophils (%) | FeNO (ppb) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1054 | 53 | M | Ex (10) | + | 93.5 |
|
| − | − | − | 8510 |
| 0.5 | nd |
| 278 | 50 | M | Ex (40) | + | 86.5 |
| − | 0.79 | − | − | 2832 |
| 0 | 11 |
| 133 | 60 | F | Never | + | 66.6 |
|
| − | − | − | 1643 |
| 0 | 29 |
| 297 | 76 | F | Never | + | 66.6 |
|
| − | − | − | 1042 |
| 0 | 21 |
| 288 | 67 | M | Ex (9) | + | 58.0 |
| − | − | − | 0.02 | 572 |
| 0.2 |
|
| 29 | 76 | F | Ex (10) | + | 47.1 |
| 0.17 | − | − | − | 633 |
| 0.5 | 9 |
| 214 | 54 | M | Ex (<1) | + | 17.1 |
| − | − | − | − | 338 |
| 0 | 20 |
| 1049 | 57 | F | Never | − | 51.3 |
| − | − | − | − | 297 |
| 2 | 20 |
| 235 | 57 | M | Never | − | 3.3 | 0.70 | − | − | − | − | 335 | 20.5 | 0.5 | 37 |
| 306 | 69 | F | Never | − | 0.03 | 0.30 | − | − | − | − | 1006 |
| 1 |
|
| 187 | 66 | M | Ex (12) | − | 0.05 | 0.03 | − | − | − | − | 1822 | 25.2 |
|
|
| 1052 | 79 | M | Never | − | 0.1 | 0.02 | − |
| − | − | 695 |
| 1.2 |
|
| 294 | 62 | F | Never | − | 0.05 | 0.02 | − | − | − | − | 43 | nd | 0.5 | 28 |
| 1055 | 70 | F | Ex (15) | − | 0.6 | 0.01 | − | − | − | − | 91 | 58.2 |
|
|
| 1053 | 59 | M | Ex (10) | − | 0.5 | 0.01 | − | − | − | − | 1754 |
| 0.7 |
|
| 1041 | 73 | F | Ex (8) | − | 1.0 | 0.01 | − | − | − | − | 286 | 43.2 | 0.5 | 8 |
| 5 | 67 | M | Never | − | 0.07 | − | − | − | − | − | 661 | 53.7 | 11 | 8 |
| 275 | 76 | F | Never | − | 2.8 | − |
| − | − | − | 696 |
| 0.7 | 20 |
| 315 | 61 | M | Never | − | 0.05 | − | − | − | − | − | 115 | 22.2 | 0.2 |
|
| 1060 | 86 | M | Ex (8) | − | 0.0 | − | − | − | − | − | 58 | 32.7 |
| 16 |
| 279 | 60 | F | Never | − | 0.05 | − | − | − | − | − | 216 | nd | nd | 48 |
| 295 | 81 | M | Ex (20) | − | 0.4 | − | − | − | − | − | 191 |
| 0 |
|
| 1058 | 72 | M | Ex (3) | − | 1.0 | − | − | − | − | − | 95 | 41.5 |
|
|
Values above indicated thresholds levels shown in bold denotes pathogen not detected by PCR. Participants are ranked according to detection of H. influenae by quantitative PCR. +, denotes pathogen detected; −, denotes pathogen not detected by standard culture or by PCR.
Agreement between Oxford Nanopore and Illumina MiSeq in HI+ samples; displayed in “top 5” bacterial species occupying the majority of total bacterial reads per sample (n = 8)
| PID | Oxford Nanopore technologies | % Bacterial reads | Ilumina MiSeq | % Bacterial reads |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1054 |
| 93.5 |
| 90.9 |
|
| 0.8 |
| 1.3 | |
|
| 0.3 |
| 0.4 | |
|
| 0.3 |
| 0.3 | |
|
| 0.2 |
| 0.1 | |
| 278 |
| 86.5 |
| 82.6 |
|
| 1.3 |
| 0.1 | |
|
| 0.3 |
| 0.1 | |
|
| 0.2 |
| 0.1 | |
|
| 0.2 |
| 0.1 | |
| 133 |
| 66.6 |
| 72.9 |
|
| 7.3 |
| 8.8 | |
|
| 2.7 |
| 0.6 | |
|
| 0.6 |
| 0.2 | |
|
| 0.5 |
| 0.2 | |
| 297 |
| 66.6 |
| 67.6 |
|
| 12.8 |
| 14.4 | |
|
| 3.2 |
| 0.1 | |
|
| 0.4 |
| 0.1 | |
|
| 0.3 |
| 0.1 | |
| 288 |
| 58.0 |
| 79.8 |
|
| 3.7 |
| 0.9 | |
|
| 1.0 |
| 0.5 | |
|
| 0.9 |
| 0.5 | |
|
| 0.7 |
| 0.4 | |
| 29 |
| 47.1 |
| 69.4 |
|
| 4.6 |
| 4.6 | |
|
| 1.8 |
| 1.0 | |
|
| 0.9 |
| 1.0 | |
|
| 0.9 |
| 0.8 | |
| 214 |
| 17.1 |
| 80.7 |
|
| 15.4 |
| 0.3 | |
|
| 3.6 |
| 0.3 | |
|
| 1.9 |
| 0.2 | |
|
| 1.3 |
| 0.2 | |
| 1049 |
| 51.3 |
| 53.7 |
|
| 10.9 |
| 29.9 | |
|
| 5.2 |
| 0.6 | |
|
| 0.8 |
| 0.3 | |
|
| 0.6 |
| 0.2 |
FIG 2Heatmap of relative abundance of species sequenced by sample using ONT; Z-scores, denoted by shade, represent the number of standard deviations above the mean number of bases per taxon for each sample. Total bacterial reads detected per sample are also shown in stacked bar chart.
FIG 3Heatmap of relative abundance of species sequenced by sample using Illumina MiSeq; Z-scores, denoted by shade, represent the number of standard deviations above the mean number of bases per taxon for each sample. Total bacterial reads detected per sample are also shown in stacked bar chart.
H. influenzae genome coverage breadth and depth with Oxford Nanopore; total and H. inf specific reads and bases in HI+ samples shown with coverage breadth (percentage of reference sequences covered), average coverage depth (at positions with ≥1 read) and number of positions on the H. influenzae genome with 1/5/10 read depth
| PID | Bacterial reads | Bacterial bases |
| Legth of | Coverage breadth | Avg coverage depth | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 read depth | 5 reads depth | 10 reads depth | ||||||||||
| 1054 | 88101 | 82374 | 93.5 | 4.97E + 08 | 4.85E + 08 | 97.7 | 1.83E + 06 | 94.2 | 243.3 | 1.72E + 06 | 1.71E + 06 | 1.70E + 06 |
| 278 | 28460 | 24609 | 86.5 | 1.14E + 08 | 1.12E + 08 | 97.9 | 1.83E + 06 | 93.4 | 53.6 | 1.71E + 06 | 1.70E + 06 | 1.69E + 06 |
| 133 | 6054 | 4031 | 66.6 | 2.43E + 07 | 2.16E + 07 | 89.1 | 1.83E + 06 | 92.7 | 10.1 | 1.70E + 06 | 1.63E + 06 | 7.48E + 05 |
| 297 | 9228 | 6142 | 66.6 | 4.32E + 07 | 3.52E + 07 | 81.6 | 1.83E + 06 | 92.9 | 17.5 | 1.70E + 06 | 1.69E + 06 | 1.60E + 06 |
| 288 | 2775 | 1610 | 58.0 | 9.06E + 06 | 8.47E + 06 | 93.5 | 1.83E + 06 | 90.7 | 4.2 | 1.66E + 06 | 6.80E + 05 | 9.49E + 03 |
| 29 | 2604 | 1226 | 47.1 | 6.97E + 06 | 5.85E + 06 | 83.8 | 1.83E + 06 | 88.9 | 3.2 | 1.63E + 06 | 3.36E + 05 | 1.06E + 02 |
| 214 | 1344 | 230 | 17.1 | 8.53E + 05 | 6.68E + 05 | 78.4 | 1.83E + 06 | 24.2 | 1.3 | 4.43E + 05 | 0.00E + 00 | 0.00E + 00 |
| 1049 | 4632 | 2376 | 51.3 | 1.62E + 07 | 1.21E + 07 | 74.5 | 1.83E + 06 | 92.1 | 6.1 | 1.69E + 06 | 1.21E + 06 | 1.04E + 05 |
FIG 4Comparison of read lengths and genome coverage for H. influenzae using Oxford Nanopore compared with Illumina MiSeq; breadth and depth of H. influenzae genome coverage with Oxford Nanopore and Illumina MiSeq in all samples.
FIG 5SNP distance matrix; pairwise comparisons between metagenomic sequences from clinical samples and sequenced clinical H. influenzae isolates from 4 patients following Oxford Nanopore sequencing are shown.
FIG 6Spiking recovery in sputum samples by Oxford Nanopore (ONT) and by qPCR. Recovery of spiked organisms (H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, M. Catarrhalis) on metagenomic sequencing using Oxford Nanopore, expressed as (a) % target bacterial genome coverage breadth and (c) % bacterial reads; or (b) detected by pathogen specific PCR.