| Literature DB >> 35322239 |
Timothée Bruel1,2, Jérôme Hadjadj3, Piet Maes4, Delphine Planas5,6, Aymeric Seve7, Isabelle Staropoli5, Florence Guivel-Benhassine5, Françoise Porrot5, William-Henry Bolland5,8, Yann Nguyen3, Marion Casadevall3, Caroline Charre9,10,11, Hélène Péré12,13, David Veyer12,13, Matthieu Prot14, Artem Baidaliuk14, Lize Cuypers15, Cyril Planchais16, Hugo Mouquet16, Guy Baele4, Luc Mouthon3, Laurent Hocqueloux7, Etienne Simon-Loriere14, Emmanuel André15,17, Benjamin Terrier3, Thierry Prazuck7, Olivier Schwartz18,19.
Abstract
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Omicron BA.1 sublineage has been supplanted in many countries by the BA.2 sublineage. BA.2 differs from BA.1 by about 21 mutations in its spike. In this study, we first compared the sensitivity of BA.1 and BA.2 to neutralization by nine therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In contrast to BA.1, BA.2 was sensitive to cilgavimab, partly inhibited by imdevimab and resistant to adintrevimab and sotrovimab. We then analyzed sera from 29 immunocompromised individuals up to 1 month after administration of Ronapreve (casirivimab and imdevimab) and/or Evusheld (cilgavimab and tixagevimab) antibody cocktails. All treated individuals displayed elevated antibody levels in their sera, which efficiently neutralized the Delta variant. Sera from Ronapreve recipients did not neutralize BA.1 and weakly inhibited BA.2. Neutralization of BA.1 and BA.2 was detected in 19 and 29 out of 29 Evusheld recipients, respectively. As compared to the Delta variant, neutralizing titers were more markedly decreased against BA.1 (344-fold) than BA.2 (nine-fold). We further report four breakthrough Omicron infections among the 29 individuals, indicating that antibody treatment did not fully prevent infection. Collectively, BA.1 and BA.2 exhibit noticeable differences in their sensitivity to therapeutic mAbs. Anti-Omicron neutralizing activity of Ronapreve and, to a lesser extent, that of Evusheld is reduced in patients' sera.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35322239 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01792-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Med ISSN: 1078-8956 Impact factor: 87.241