| Literature DB >> 35321451 |
Abstract
As the core of artificial intelligence, machine learning has strong application advantages in multi-criteria intelligent evaluation and decision-making. The level of sustainable development is of great significance to the safety evaluation of coal mining enterprises. BP neural network is a classical algorithm model in machine learning. In this paper, the BP neural network is applied to the sustainable development level decision-making and safety evaluation of coal mining enterprises. Based on the analysis of the evaluation method for sustainable development of coal enterprises, the evaluation index system of sustainable development of coal enterprises is established, and a multi-layer forward neural network model based on error backpropagation algorithm is constructed. Based on the system theory of man, machine, environment, and management, and taking the four single elements and the whole system in a coal mine as the research object, this paper systematically analyzes and studies the evaluation and continuous improvement of coal mine intrinsic safety. The BP neural network evaluation model is used to analyze and study the intrinsic safety of coal mines, the shortcomings of the intrinsic safety construction of coal mines are found, and then improvement measures are put forward to effectively promote the safe production of coal mines and finally realize the intrinsic safety goal of the coal mine.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35321451 PMCID: PMC8938146 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5233845
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Evaluation index system of sustainable development of coal enterprises.
Figure 2BP neural network model.
Normalization rules of neural network input data.
| Evaluation index | Network input | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | Value | Range | Value | Range | Value | |
| Employee medical insurance rate (%) | ≤10 | 0.1 | (10, 100) | Y/100 | 100 | 1 |
| Per capita housing area of employees (m2/person) | = 0 | 0 | (0, 20) | Y/20 | ≥20 | 1 |
| Average education level of employees | Below medium | 0.3–0.5 | Fairly good | 0.7 | Good | 0.9 |
| Enrollment rate of employees' children (%) | ≤10 | 0.1 | (10, 100) | (Y-80)/(120–80) | 100 | 1 |
| Reserve production ratio (%) | ≤80 | 0.1 | (80, 120) | Y/100 | ≥120 | 1 |
| Recovery ratio (%) | ≤10 | 0.1 | (10, 100) | Y/100 | 100 | 1 |
| Comprehensive utilization degree of resources | Below medium | 0.3–0.5 | Fairly good | 0.7 | Good | 0.9 |
| Proportion of noncoal industry (%) | ≤10 | 0.1 | (10, 100) | Y/100 | 100 | 1 |
| Total efficiency of raw coal (t/person) | = 0 | 0 | (0, 4) | Y/4 | ≥4 | 1 |
| Per capita income of miners (yuan/month) | ≤1000 | 0.1 | (1000, 10000) | Y/10000 | ≥10000 | 1 |
| Ratio of profits and taxes on funds (%) | = 0 | 0 | (0, 20) | Y/20 | ≥20 | 1 |
| Land reclamation rate of mining area (%) | ≤10 | 0.1 | (10, 100) | Y/100 | 100 | 1 |
| Standard rate of noise control in mining area (%) | ≤10 | 0.1 | (10, 100) | Y/100 | 100 | 1 |
| Standard rate of wastewater treatment in mining area (%) | ≤10 | 0.1 | (10, 100) | Y/100 | 100 | 1 |
| Standard rate of waste gas treatment in mining area (%) | ≤10 | 0.1 | (10, 100) | Y/100 | 100 | 1 |
| Standard rate of solid waste discharge in mining area (%) | ≤10 | 0.1 | (10, 100) | Y/100 | 100 | 1 |
| Million ton mortality (%) | = 0 | 1 | (0, 1) | (1-Y)/1 | ≥1 | 0 |
Figure 3Coal mine safety evaluation classification model.
Scoring standard for coal mine safety evaluation.
| Safety grade | Safety classification | Evaluation score | Characterization state |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intrinsic safety I | [90,100) | Safe coal mine (ideal) |
| 2 | Intrinsic safety II | [80,90) | Basic safety (good) |
| 3 | Intrinsic safety III | [70,80) | Coal mine with poor safety, early warning status (general) |
| 4 | Intrinsic safety IV | [60,70) | Unsafe coal mine, medium alarm status (poor) |
| 5 | Failure to achieve intrinsic safety | [0,60) | Unsafe coal mine, heavy alarm state (bad) |
Figure 4Network training and model application steps.
Network learning sample.
| Evaluation index | Network learning sample (enterprises) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
| Employee medical insurance rate (%) | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.50 |
| Per capita housing area of employees (m2/person) | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.74 |
| Average education level of employees | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Enrollment rate of employees' children (%) | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.94 |
| Reserve production ratio (%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Recovery ratio (%) | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.77 |
| Comprehensive utilization degree of resources | 0.80 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Proportion of non-coal industry (%) | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.38 |
| Total efficiency of raw coal (t/person) | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.70 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.45 |
| Per capita income of miners (Yuan/month) | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.45 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| Ratio of profits and taxes on funds (%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
| Land reclamation rate of mining area (%) | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.33 |
| Standard rate of noise control in mining area (%) | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.50 |
| Standard rate of wastewater treatment in mining area (%) | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.54 |
| Standard rate of waste gas treatment in mining area (%) | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.91 |
| Standard rate of solid waste discharge in mining area (%) | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
| Million ton mortality (%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.94 |
Evaluation results.
| Enterprises | Network output value | Sustainable development level | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.8806 | First level | Sustainable development |
| 2 | 0.8952 | First level | Sustainable development |
| 3 | 0.7277 | second level | Primary sustainable development |
| 4 | 0.8096 | second level | Primary sustainable development |
| 5 | 0.5891 | Third level | Transition from traditional development to sustainable development |
| 6 | 0.6122 | Third level | Transition from traditional development to sustainable development |
| 7 | 0.3963 | Fourth level | Traditional development |
| 8 | 0.2293 | Fourth level | Traditional development |
Data of coal mine safety.
| Man | Machine | Environment | Management | Expected value | Simulated value of BP neural network | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.90 | / |
| 2 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.90 | / |
| 3 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.91 | / |
| 4 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.88 | / |
| 5 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.87 | / |
| 6 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.81 | / |
| 7 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.89 | / |
| 8 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.87 | / |
| 9 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.91 | / |
| 10 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.93 | / |
| 11 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.91 | / | 0.93 |
| 12 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.81 | 0.93 | / | 0.91 |