| Literature DB >> 35321202 |
Benren Tan1, Yichun Huang2, Jinkun Zheng1, Xiaomei Xu1, Jian Xiao1, Yanlin Liu1.
Abstract
Objective: To establish the quality standard of Zhiqingshu lotion by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35321202 PMCID: PMC8938067 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2351366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Mobile phase elution gradient.
| Time (min) | 8 | 15 | 30 | 50 | 60 | 70 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetonitrile | 10 | 18 | 25 | 30 | 40 | 80 |
| 1% phosphate buffer solution | 90 | 82 | 75 | 70 | 60 | 20 |
Column temperature: 30°C. Flow rate: 1 mL·min−1. Detection wavelength: 324 nm. Injection volume: 10 μL. The number of theoretical plates calculated as chlorogenic acid should not be less than 3000.
Primer sequences.
| Primer | Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|
| TNF- | F: CTTCTGCCTGCTGCACTTTG |
| R: GTCACTCGGGGTTCGAGAAG | |
| IL-1 | F: GTACCTGTCCTGCGTGTTGA |
| R: GGGAACTGGGCAGACTCAAA | |
| GAPDH | F: CATCACTGCCACCCAGAAGACTG |
| R: ATGCCAGTGAGCTTCCCGTTCAG |
HPLC methodological investigation.
| Linear regression | Precision | Repeatability | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emodin |
| 0.13% | 0.56% |
| Chrysophanol |
| 0.31% | 0.26% |
| Caffeic acid |
| 0.42% | 0.79% |
| Berberine hydrochloride |
| 0.32% | 0.68% |
Figure 1Determination of emodin and chrysophanol content in Zhiqingshu lotion: (a) HPLC chromatogram of emodin and chrysophanol reference substance; (b) HPLC chromatogram of Zhiqingshu lotion test solution; (c) HPLC chromatogram of the negative reference substance.
Figure 2Determination of caffeic acid and berberine hydrochloride content in Zhiqingshu lotion: (a) HPLC chromatogram of caffeic acid and berberine hydrochloride reference substance; (b) HPLC chromatogram of Zhiqingshu lotion test solution; (c) HPLC chromatogram of the negative reference substance.
Figure 3The effect of Zhiqingshu lotion on TNF-α and IL-1β levels in RAW264.7 cells treated with LPS. ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the first group, #P < 0.05 vs. the second group.