Literature DB >> 35320355

Differential Gain-of-Function Activity of Three p53 Hotspot Mutants In Vivo.

Shunbin Xiong1, Dhruv Chachad1,2, Yun Zhang3, Jovanka Gencel-Augusto1,2, Mario Sirito1, Vinod Pant1, Peirong Yang1, Chang Sun1,2, Gilda Chau1, Yuan Qi4, Xiaoping Su4, Elizabeth M Whitley5, Adel K El-Naggar6, Guillermina Lozano1.   

Abstract

The majority of TP53 missense mutations identified in cancer patients are in the DNA-binding domain and are characterized as either structural or contact mutations. These missense mutations exhibit inhibitory effects on wild-type p53 activity. More importantly, these mutations also demonstrate gain-of-function (GOF) activities characterized by increased metastasis, poor prognosis, and drug resistance. To better understand the activities by which TP53 mutations, identified in Li-Fraumeni syndrome, contribute to tumorigenesis, we generated mice harboring a novel germline Trp53R245W allele (contact mutation) and compared them with existing models with Trp53R172H (structural mutation) and Trp53R270H (contact mutation) alleles. Thymocytes from heterozygous mice showed that all three hotspot mutations exhibited similar inhibitory effects on wild-type p53 transcription in vivo, and tumors from these mice had similar levels of loss of heterozygosity. However, the overall survival of Trp53R245W/+ and Trp53R270H/+ mice, but not Trp53R172H/+ mice, was significantly shorter than that of Trp53+/- mice, providing strong evidence for p53-mutant-specific GOF contributions to tumor development. Furthermore, Trp53R245W/+ and Trp53R270H/+ mice had more osteosarcoma metastases than Trp53R172H/+ mice, suggesting that these two contact mutants have stronger GOF in driving osteosarcoma metastasis. Transcriptomic analyses using RNA sequencing data from Trp53R172H/+, Trp53R245W/+, and Trp53R270H/+ primary osteosarcomas in comparison with Trp53+/- indicated that GOF of the three mutants was mediated by distinct pathways. Thus, both the inhibitory effect of mutant over wild-type p53 and GOF activities of mutant p53 contributed to tumorigenesis in vivo. Targeting p53 mutant-specific pathways may be important for therapeutic outcomes in osteosarcoma. SIGNIFICANCE: p53 hotspot mutants inhibit wild-type p53 similarly but differ in their GOF activities, with stronger tumor-promoting activity in contact mutants and distinct protein partners of each mutant driving tumorigenesis and metastasis. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35320355      PMCID: PMC9117479          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-3376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   13.312


  33 in total

1.  Restoring expression of wild-type p53 suppresses tumor growth but does not cause tumor regression in mice with a p53 missense mutation.

Authors:  Yongxing Wang; Young-Ah Suh; Maren Y Fuller; James G Jackson; Shunbin Xiong; Tamara Terzian; Alfonso Quintás-Cardama; James A Bankson; Adel K El-Naggar; Guillermina Lozano
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Pla2g16 phospholipase mediates gain-of-function activities of mutant p53.

Authors:  Shunbin Xiong; Huolin Tu; Madhusudhan Kollareddy; Vinod Pant; Qin Li; Yun Zhang; James G Jackson; Young-Ah Suh; Ana C Elizondo-Fraire; Peirong Yang; Gilda Chau; Mehrnoosh Tashakori; Amanda R Wasylishen; Zhenlin Ju; Hilla Solomon; Varda Rotter; Bin Liu; Adel K El-Naggar; Lawrence A Donehower; Luis Alfonso Martinez; Guillermina Lozano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mutant p53 gain-of-function in cancer.

Authors:  Moshe Oren; Varda Rotter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  A dominant-negative effect drives selection of TP53 missense mutations in myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Steffen Boettcher; Peter G Miller; Rohan Sharma; Marie McConkey; Matthew Leventhal; Andrei V Krivtsov; Andrew O Giacomelli; Waihay Wong; Jesi Kim; Sherry Chao; Kari J Kurppa; Xiaoping Yang; Kirsten Milenkowic; Federica Piccioni; David E Root; Frank G Rücker; Yael Flamand; Donna Neuberg; R Coleman Lindsley; Pasi A Jänne; William C Hahn; Tyler Jacks; Hartmut Döhner; Scott A Armstrong; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  20 years studying p53 functions in genetically engineered mice.

Authors:  Lawrence A Donehower; Guillermina Lozano
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Translational biology of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Maya Kansara; Michele W Teng; Mark J Smyth; David M Thomas
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  When mutants gain new powers: news from the mutant p53 field.

Authors:  Ran Brosh; Varda Rotter
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Therapeutic Ablation of Gain-of-Function Mutant p53 in Colorectal Cancer Inhibits Stat3-Mediated Tumor Growth and Invasion.

Authors:  Ramona Schulz-Heddergott; Nadine Stark; Shelley J Edmunds; Jinyu Li; Lena-Christin Conradi; Hanibal Bohnenberger; Fatih Ceteci; Florian R Greten; Matthias Dobbelstein; Ute M Moll
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Somatic Trp53 mutations differentially drive breast cancer and evolution of metastases.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Shunbin Xiong; Bin Liu; Vinod Pant; Francis Celii; Gilda Chau; Ana C Elizondo-Fraire; Peirong Yang; Mingjian James You; Adel K El-Naggar; Nicholas E Navin; Guillermina Lozano
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Heterogeneity of Li-Fraumeni syndrome links to unequal gain-of-function effects of p53 mutations.

Authors:  Jie Xu; Jin Qian; Ye Hu; Jilin Wang; Xiaolin Zhou; Haoyan Chen; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.