Kai Golibrzuch1,2, Sven Schwabe1,2,3, Tianli Zhong1,2, Kim Papendorf1,2, Alec M Wodtke1,2. 1. Max-Planck-Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Am Fassberg 11, D-37077 Goettingen, Germany. 2. Institute for Physical Chemistry, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Tammannstrasse 6, D- 37077 Goettingen, Germany. 3. Institute for Nanophotonics, Hans-Adolf-Krebs-Weg 1, D-37077 Goettingen, Germany.
Abstract
We describe here the application of an inexpensive event-based/neuromorphic camera in an ion imaging experiment operated at 1 kHz detection rate to study real-time velocity-resolved kinetics of thermal desorption. Such measurements involve a single gas pulse to initiate a time-dependent desorption process and a high repetition rate laser, where each pulse of the laser is used to produce an ion image. The sequence of ion images allows the time dependence of the desorption flux to be followed in real time. In previous work where a conventional framing camera was used, the large number of megapixel-sized images required data transfer and storage rates of up to 16 GB/s. This necessitated a large onboard memory that was quickly filled and limited continuous measurement to only a few seconds. Read-out of the memory became the bottleneck to the rate of data acquisition. We show here that since most pixels in each ion image contain no data, the data rate can be dramatically reduced by using an event-based/neuromorphic camera. The data stream is thus reduced to the intensity and location information on the pixels that are lit up by each ion event together with a time-stamp indicating the arrival time of an ion at the detector. This dramatically increases the duty cycle of the method and provides insights for the execution of other high rep-rate ion imaging experiments.
We describe here the application of an inexpensive event-based/neuromorphic camera in an ion imaging experiment operated at 1 kHz detection rate to study real-time velocity-resolved kinetics of thermal desorption. Such measurements involve a single gas pulse to initiate a time-dependent desorption process and a high repetition rate laser, where each pulse of the laser is used to produce an ion image. The sequence of ion images allows the time dependence of the desorption flux to be followed in real time. In previous work where a conventional framing camera was used, the large number of megapixel-sized images required data transfer and storage rates of up to 16 GB/s. This necessitated a large onboard memory that was quickly filled and limited continuous measurement to only a few seconds. Read-out of the memory became the bottleneck to the rate of data acquisition. We show here that since most pixels in each ion image contain no data, the data rate can be dramatically reduced by using an event-based/neuromorphic camera. The data stream is thus reduced to the intensity and location information on the pixels that are lit up by each ion event together with a time-stamp indicating the arrival time of an ion at the detector. This dramatically increases the duty cycle of the method and provides insights for the execution of other high rep-rate ion imaging experiments.
Ion
imaging[1] and its variants—velocity
map imaging,[2] slicing,[3−7] and 3D imaging[8]—have
proven to be powerful tools for the study of chemical dynamics including
photodissociation dynamics,[1,9] crossed-beam scattering,[3,10−12] and photoelectron spectroscopy.[13,14] Over the past few years, ion imaging has also been extended to allow
the investigation of gas–surface collisions[15−17] and velocity-resolved
surface-reaction kinetics (VRK).[17,18]In VRK,
the reaction is initiated by a pulsed molecular beam and
the desorbed reaction products are ionized via nonresonant multiphoton
femtosecond-laser ionization 1–2 cm from the surface and detected
on an ion imaging detector. The delay between the pulsed molecular
beam and the pulsed ionizing laser is scanned under steady-state conditions,[16,17] averaging the signal to obtain a high quality ion image at each
delay. The ion image provides product velocity information that is
used to obtain the speed and angular distributions of the products,
from which one can determine the product’s flux as well as
its flight time from the surface to the laser focus. This provides
the necessary information to calculate the product flux vs surface
reaction time, referred to as the kinetic trace, a model-independent
observable reflecting the speed of the reaction.Typically,
the detection rate of such an experiment is low (10
Hz) and is limited by the acquisition rates of the CCD and CMOS cameras,
which record the ion images. For example, to obtain the kinetic trace
for CO oxidation on Pd(332) requires about 1 h.[19] Many catalysts under real reaction conditions change their
chemical composition and structure as they become activated or while
they are being poisoned through use. It is therefore desirable to
develop high-speed methods where transient rates can be quickly measured.
Recently, Borodin et al. demonstrated a 1 kHz detection rate using
a high-speed CMOS camera capable of acquiring up to 1280 × 800
pixel resolution images at 7.2 kHz.[19] This
camera allowed an ion image to be acquired for each ionizing laser
pulse from a 1 kHz Ti:Sa laser. The pulsed molecular beam valve was
then operated at 10 Hz starting a new reaction every 100 ms, while
ion images were acquired at 1 kHz providing 1 ms time resolution in
the kinetic trace. Using this real-time velocity-resolved kinetics
approach, the complete kinetic trace of CO desorption and CO oxidation
on Pd(332) could be measured within only a few seconds, a dramatic
improvement of the data acquisition.However, these experiments
also revealed a severe practical problem
typical of imaging experiments performed at high repetition rates.
Since the camera needs to record an ion image with Mpixel size for
each laser shot, the data acquisition rate can easily reach more than
10 GB/s, limiting the possible duration of any experiment to the time
required to fill an on-board high-speed memory, a time that can be
as short as a few seconds. The contents of the onboard memory must
then be read out before additional ion images can be collected. Thus,
the time required for the memory readout to an external solid state
storage device becomes the bottleneck to the rate of data acquisition.
For example, in the experiments just mentioned, the readout time was
several minutes, while the actual acquisition time was only a few
seconds.[19] Consequently, using framing
cameras, increasing the frame rate beyond 1 kHz makes no sense. This
is unfortunate, as suitable laser operating at 100 kHz (e.g., ytterbium
fiber lasers) promise further improvements in data acquisition rates
and kinetic time resolution in VRK experiments.The basic problem
of frame-based cameras is the fact that their
natural unit of information is a full camera frame with up to 1 Mpixel
worth of intensity data. However, a single laser shot in a VRK experiment
typically produces only 5–10 ions, lighting up 50–100
pixels of the camera. An ideal read-out system for a high-speed imaging
detector would only read out those pixels that actually contain information
about these ion detection events. This is accomplished by an event-based
or neuromorphic camera,[20−24] which we show here is ideal for real time VRK experiments.Event-cameras can serve as detectors for light pulses like those
produced by the phosphor screen of an ion imaging detector as they
employ a working principle mimicking the human retina[25] where only changes in brightness are detected. A threshold
can be set to reject small brightness changes, suppressing background
so that only pixels involved in an ion detection event are detected.
In contrast to the high speed framing cameras that record GBytes of
data per second, the output of an event-camera-based ion imaging experiment
is reduced to a stream of data characterizing only those few pixels
whose brightness changes, specifically their spatial coordinates and
a time stamp. A recent review summarizes more details and features
of commercial event-based sensors.[24] Recently,
event-based sensors with nanosecond time resolution have been applied
in velocity map imaging experiments.[26−29] These new types of cameras offer
multimass detection and allow coincidence imaging experiments. However,
they suffer from very high costs compared to standard framing cameras.In this paper, we present the application of a low-cost event-based
camera (DAVIS346, IniVation) in a real time VRK experiment recording
ion images at a 1 kHz repetition rate. We have chosen the desorption
of ammonia (NH3), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitric oxide
(NO) from Pt(332) as simple systems to test the capabilities of this
detection scheme. The time scale of these simple desorption processes
can easily be tuned from several milliseconds to >100 ms by changing
the surface temperature. This enables an evaluation of the limits
of event-based detection. We explore the limit in detection by investigation
of the typical time response of the camera to single ion events. The
nominal read-out latency of <1 ms of the DAVIS346 provides time
stamp accuracy sufficient for these experiments. For all three test
cases, the camera is easily able to resolve ions originating from
individual laser shots. We estimate that reliable operation is possible
up to about 2 kHz allowing real-time velocity resolved experiments
with up to 500 μs time resolution. This simple change in the
camera technology for the VRK experiment allows reaching the high
data acquisition rates demonstrated in ref (19), while avoiding the massive data volume of that
work.
Experimental Set-Up
The apparatus used in this work
is similar to that used in earlier
VRK experiments.[15−19,30] It consists of a source chamber
equipped with both a Parker Series 9 General Valve and an Even-Lavie
type nozzle, producing two pulsed molecular beams. Both beams are
skimmed and pass two stages of differential pumping before entering
an ultrahigh vacuum chamber with a base pressure of 6 × 10–10 mbar where a Pt(332) sample is held. The beams cross
at the surface position impinging at an incidence angle relative to
the surface normal of 18°. For desorption experiments shown here,
we only use the general valve molecular beam with a typical pulse
duration of 250 μs. Depending on the desorption rates studied,
the nozzle repetition rate can be varied from 0.5 to 50 Hz. The UHV
chamber also houses equipment needed for preparing an atomically clean
surface. The single crystal Pt(332) sample is mounted to a 4-axis
manipulator. Prior to the experiment, the surface is cleaned by Ar+ bombardment and heated to 1050 K in 5 × 10–7 mbar oxygen for 20 min followed by annealing to 1100 K in UHV for
5 min. The surface quality and cleanliness is checked by low energy
electron diffraction (LEED) and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES).For surface kinetics experiments, the clean and reconstructed sample
is then transported in front of the molecular beam behind an ion imaging
detector similar to those described previously.[15−19,30] Molecules leaving the
surface are ionized at a distance of about 10 mm from the surface
via nonresonant multiphoton ionization using 800 nm pulses from a
Ti:Sa laser (120 fs, 1 kHz, 450 μJ per pulse) focused with a
150 mm plano-convex lens. The ions are generated between a repeller
and an extractor grid, both with a diameter of 41 mm and separated
from one another by 5 mm. A 3 kV pulse applied to the repeller grid
extracts the ions, which then pass through a 320 mm long time-of-flight
(TOF) tube arriving at a 56 mm diameter Chevron MCP detector. An Einzel
lens is located about 19 mm downstream from the repeller which allows
switching between spatial ion imaging and velocity map imaging (VMI).
The voltage applied to the font face of the MCP detector is time-gated
(gate duration 150 ns) to pass ions of a specific mass-to-charge ratio.
These ions strike an MCP, producing a pulse of secondary electrons
that is accelerated onto a P47 phosphor screen (peak emission 400
nm, 100 ns decay time). A f/0.95, 50 mm fixed focal
length lens images the light from the phosphor screen onto the event
camera (DAVIS346, IniVation, 246 × 320 pixel).The DAVIS346
event-camera is based on IniVation’s Dynamic
Vision Platform and employs an asynchronous read-out.[21] The output of the camera is a stream of pixel “hits”
where each hit contains the pixel coordinates, time stamp in microseconds,
and polarity, i.e., brightness increased (ON) or brightness decreased
(OFF). Consequently, we only obtain information about those pixels
that were actually irradiated by the light flash from the phosphor
screen. The pixel coordinates provide spatial information related
to ion velocities; this allows discriminating between molecules in
the background, in the incident molecular beam, and in those desorbing
from the surface. The camera is not actively synchronized to the experiment
and runs as a standalone device. However, it offers an input for time
stamping of a TTL trigger signal. We use this input to apply a trigger
that is synchronized with the molecular beam pulsed valve. This allows
us to reference the pixel time stamps to the kinetic time of the experiment.
The polarity information is not useful for these experiments; therefore,
we only use ON events for our data analysis.Due to stray light
from the pulsed laser, the camera was shielded
from laboratory light. Using the camera in the dark leads to an increased
noise on the sensor. Hence, we applied a K-noise filter implemented
in the camera’s DV software.[31] The
K-noise filter ensures that for each pixel hit in the stream, an ion
event is only reported if at least three neighboring pixels are lit
up within 500 μs of one another. This simple approach eliminates
any dark noise from the stored event-stream.
Results
The most
important feature of the data stream is the time stamp
associated with each pixel hit. The time stamp of the DAVIS346 has
a nominal temporal resolution of 1 μs; however, the readout
electronics lead to loss of temporal resolution, referred to as readout
latency, which also depends on several settings of the camera and
on the number and intensity of each detected pixel hit. Brewer and
Hawks evaluated the optical response of the DAVIS346 and other commercial
event-based cameras using a controlled light stimulus.[32] They also showed that the readout latency determines
the temporal resolution—the intrinsic readout latency leads
to an uncertainty in the time stamping of each detected pixel hit
that can be as much as 1 ms depending on the total number of pixel
hits. Since each pulse in the 1 kHz pulse train used in this work
determines the time in the kinetic trace, it is sufficient to determine
if the time stamp is accurate enough to distinguish ions produced
by different laser pulses.Figure a shows
a time stamp histogram relative to the external trigger marking the
time when the pulsed molecular beam is fired, produced by a single
ion detection event in our apparatus. The inset shows the corresponding
reconstructed image, reflecting a single ion detection event on the
MCP/P47-phosphor detector. The integral of the histogram is proportional
to the intensity integral of the image. Hence bright pixels contribute
more strongly than dim pixels to the time stamp distribution. Note
that the distribution of timestamps is a result of the “time
stamping during readout” inside the camera. This leads to the
observed time spread in the data (latency), which depends on the readout
speed and the event-rate from the detector (scene illumination). Figure b shows the time-stamp
distribution originating from just the first laser shot after the
nozzle opens, averaged over 7533 molecular/laser beam pulses. All
pixel hits are time-stamped within ∼300 μs of one another,
sufficient to assign each ion detection event to a specific laser
pulse of a 1 kHz pulse train.
Figure 1
Histogram of the camera time stamps for a range
of 500–1000
μs after the detected trigger event using a P47 phosphor. Panel
a: distribution of time stamps originating from a single ion detection
event. The difference in illuminations allows a single ion event to
cause multiple pixel hits resulting in an intensity distribution on
the camera. The inset of panel a shows the reconstructed image from
the specific pixel hits in the histogram with up to 8 hits per pixel.
Panel b: distribution of time stamps from 500 to 1000 μs after
nozzle opening averaged over 7533 laser/molecular beam shots. The
data show that all pixel hits are time stamped accurately within about
300 μs.
Histogram of the camera time stamps for a range
of 500–1000
μs after the detected trigger event using a P47 phosphor. Panel
a: distribution of time stamps originating from a single ion detection
event. The difference in illuminations allows a single ion event to
cause multiple pixel hits resulting in an intensity distribution on
the camera. The inset of panel a shows the reconstructed image from
the specific pixel hits in the histogram with up to 8 hits per pixel.
Panel b: distribution of time stamps from 500 to 1000 μs after
nozzle opening averaged over 7533 laser/molecular beam shots. The
data show that all pixel hits are time stamped accurately within about
300 μs.Figure shows results
for NH3 desorption from Pt(332). Specifically, we show
an averaged spatial distribution of the ions. The ion image is reconstructed
by summing all pixel hits for 7500 molecular beam pulses, where each
molecular beam pulse is associated with many laser shots at different
times in the kinetic trace that produced ions. The width of the distribution
in the vertical direction reflects the velocity spread of the neutral
molecules in the experiment. The horizontal spread is determined by
the convolution of the ionization volume produced by the focused laser
beam (white lines), the size of the pulsed molecular beam incident
at the surface and the angular distribution of the desorbing molecules.
The black rectangle indicates a region of the ion image where NH3 background is strongest. The red rectangle shows the velocities
of the incident molecular beam which is moving toward the Pt surface.
The green rectangle marks the area used to most sensitively and selectively
detect thermally desorbing NH3 molecules, which move away
from the surface. We can now extract time traces for these different
velocity groups.
Figure 2
Reconstructed images from the camera hits accumulated
over 7598
laser shots for NH3 desorption from Pt(332) at 500 K surface
temperature. The white lines illustrate the focus shape of the ionizing
laser, while the gray line indicates the incident beam. The red square
marks the signal originating from ionization of the incident molecular
beam. The green rectangle marks the area used to obtain kinetic traces
for desorption measurements. The region is selected in a way that
is reduced the influence of background signal. The black rectangle
shows an area where the NH3 desorption signal overlaps
with background signal of NH3 pressure building up inside
the UHV chamber.
Reconstructed images from the camera hits accumulated
over 7598
laser shots for NH3 desorption from Pt(332) at 500 K surface
temperature. The white lines illustrate the focus shape of the ionizing
laser, while the gray line indicates the incident beam. The red square
marks the signal originating from ionization of the incident molecular
beam. The green rectangle marks the area used to obtain kinetic traces
for desorption measurements. The region is selected in a way that
is reduced the influence of background signal. The black rectangle
shows an area where the NH3 desorption signal overlaps
with background signal of NH3 pressure building up inside
the UHV chamber.Figure shows histograms
of the time stamps for the red, green and black region of interest
marked in Figure .
The red trace in the right panel of Figure shows the average time response of the incident
molecular beam with a single sharp peak 1.2 ms after nozzle opening.
The green trace in Figure shows the time response of the NH3 desorption
signal with a rise in intensity at 1.2 ms followed by a decay. Above
20 ms, the signal stays at a nonzero level due to overlapping NH3 background in the UHV chamber building up during nozzle operation.
The black trace shows an almost constant signal due to a steady NH3 background building up inside the UHV chamber which is independent
of the delay between ionizing laser and pulsed molecular beam.
Figure 3
Time traces
for the incident molecular beam (red), NH3 desorption from
Pt(332) (green) and NH3 background. The
traces result from a histogram of events occurring in the red, green,
and black rectangles of Figure .
Time traces
for the incident molecular beam (red), NH3 desorption from
Pt(332) (green) and NH3 background. The
traces result from a histogram of events occurring in the red, green,
and black rectangles of Figure .The data in Figure demonstrates that the signal originating
from individual laser shots
can be distinguished on the event-camera. Hence, we may sum up all
pixel hits associated with each laser shot to obtain the kinetic trace
for desorption.Figure shows examples
for kinetic traces obtained in this way for NH3, CO, and
NO desorption from Pt(332) at several surface temperatures. The closed
circles show the raw data, while the lines are fits assuming first
order desorption kinetics. We use this to obtain first order rate
constants for CO (blue), NO (red), and NH3 (black) desorption
from Pt(332) which are shown on an Arrhenius plot in Figure in comparison to previous
results obtained using conventional VRK[33,34] (open symbols)
and molecular beam relaxation spectroscopy (MBRS, dashed lines).[35] The solid lines are Arrhenius fits to the temperature
dependent rate constants. Table shows the resulting activation energies and prefactors.
Figure 4
Examples
for observed kinetic traces for NH3 (top),
CO (middle), and NO (bottom) desorption from Pt(332) at three different
surface temperatures, respectively. The data show the average pixel
hits per molecular beam pulse as a function of time after the nozzle
opening. The dots show the raw data points, and the solid lines show
the fits to the data assuming first order desorption kinetics.
Figure 5
Arrhenius of the measured first-order desorption rate
constants
as a function of inverse surface temperature for NH3 (black),
NO (red), and CO (blue) desorption from Pt(332). Solid points show
rate constants obtained in this work. The open symbol shows VRK data
of ref (33) (CO, open
blue) and ref (34) (NH3, open black). The dashed lines show Arrhenius curves calculated
from MBRS experiments of Lin and Somorjai for Pt(557).[35]
Table 1
Arrhenius
Activation Energies and
Prefactors Obtained from Figure a
activation energy/eV
prefactor/s–1
CO/Pt(332)
1.57 ± 0.11
4.98 × 1014
NO/Pt(332)
1.50 ± 0.04
3.90 × 1015
NH3/Pt(332)
1.27 ± 0.06
1.19 × 1015
Errors represent
95% confidence
interval.
Examples
for observed kinetic traces for NH3 (top),
CO (middle), and NO (bottom) desorption from Pt(332) at three different
surface temperatures, respectively. The data show the average pixel
hits per molecular beam pulse as a function of time after the nozzle
opening. The dots show the raw data points, and the solid lines show
the fits to the data assuming first order desorption kinetics.Arrhenius of the measured first-order desorption rate
constants
as a function of inverse surface temperature for NH3 (black),
NO (red), and CO (blue) desorption from Pt(332). Solid points show
rate constants obtained in this work. The open symbol shows VRK data
of ref (33) (CO, open
blue) and ref (34) (NH3, open black). The dashed lines show Arrhenius curves calculated
from MBRS experiments of Lin and Somorjai for Pt(557).[35]Errors represent
95% confidence
interval.
Discussion
The
time stamp histograms in Figure demonstrate that the event-based camera is able to
resolve ion hits from individual laser pulses at 1 kHz. While the
P47 phosphor screen causes a sudden excitation of the sensor, the
camera time stamp shows a latency of less than 300 μs. It seems
therefore possible to use the camera for experiments running at up
to 2 kHz repetition rate with a kinetic time resolution of 500 μs.
It is worth noting that the latency might increase for high count-rates,
which are however unlikely in ion imaging applications where a single
laser pulse typically produces 2–10 ions with each ion exciting
4 × 4 pixels. Consequently, even at 2 kHz detection rate only
3.2 × 105 pixel per second would be excited. This
is still significantly lower than the maximum throughput of (8–12)
× 106 pixel hits per second of the DAVIS346 camera.
We want to bring to the reader’s attention that it is possible
to increase the spatial resolution of the camera to a subpixel level
by using centroiding algorithms that have been developed in the past.[36−39] The processing can even be more efficient since the step of identifying
bright pixels of a full frame image is unnecessary. In our experiments,
an increased resolution has no benefit since we detect broad thermal
velocity distributions. The only advantage might be an increased signal-to-noise
ratio since all ions contribute only a single count to the signal.The most significant advantage over using standard high-speed framing
cameras is the aspect of data storage. For the example shown in Figure and Figure , we accumulated a signal of
187500 laser shots (7500 molecular beam pulses at 25 Hz). A typical
high-speed camera with the same number of pixels and 12bit resolution
would require storage of about 22GB of image data, which would need
to be stored to an external hard drive. In contrast, the primary AE4DAT
file stored by the DAVIS346 camera software is only 70 MB in size.
In addition, an event-camera with a higher pixel number for increased
resolution, will not significantly increase the data size since only
active pixels are stored. Furthermore, the DAVIS346 camera stores
the data directly on the hard drive of the computer while high-speed
framing camera typically first store the images in an internal RAM
and transfer them to the computer after the measurement is finished.
The readout process can easily take several minutes and leads to a
decrease in the duty cycle of the experiment.The measured desorption
rates cover a significant range from 5
to 1000 s–1 which corresponds to residence times
of the molecules from 1 to 200 ms. While a desorption rate of kd = 1000 s–1 represents the
upper limit for the time resolution of a 1 kHz repetition rate laser,
the data shows that the high detection rate is also useful to measure
slow kinetic rates as suggested by Borodin et al.[19] All velocity resolved kinetics suffer from the problem
that they probe the flux of molecules leaving the surface, which decreases
with decreasing desorption rate. In conventional velocity-resolved
kinetics experiments this results in a rapidly increasing measurement
time. Working at high acquisition rates and high duty cycle can partially
overcome this problem since it increases the sampling rate by several
orders of magnitude. Hence, a decreasing desorption flux is compensated
by a high number of sample points. Consequently, high repetition rate
detection allows an extension of kinetic data to lower surface temperatures
which increases the accuracy of extracted Arrhenius activation energies.Finally, the comparison of Figure shows that the desorption rate constants obtained
in this work (solid circles) agree very well to previous VRK experiments[33,34] (open circles) for CO and NH3. The VRK data usually extend
to higher surface temperatures than the 1 kHz measurements due to
the use of a shorter molecular beam pulse and the smaller time increments
available in a delay scan approach. However, the 1 kHz detection data
of this work extend to lower surface temperatures which are typically
not covered in VRK experiments because of the very low flux from the
surface and the resulting extensive measurement times. The high sampling
rate of this work makes these temperatures accessible. The dashed
red lines in Figure show Arrhenius curves calculated from the parameters obtained by
Lin and Somorjai[35] for CO (blue) and NO
(red) desorption from Pt(557) using MBRS. Pt(557) has the sasme step
density of 16.6% as Pt(332) but a different step geometry. The comparison
shows that the parameters of Lin and Somorjai agree very well with
the rate constants obtained for CO desorption from Pt(332) of this
work. In contrast, the MRBS results for NO desorption from Pt(557)
are significantly different from those obtained for desorption from
Pt(332) in this work. This might be an indication for the influence
of different step geometries on the binding energy of NO.
Conclusions
We have shown in this paper the possibility to apply a low-cost
event-based camera to measure real-time kinetics at a sampling rate
of 1 kHz. In contrast to previous experiments using high-speed framing
cameras, this approach has several advantages. First, the camera has
a much more compact design and lower power consumption. Second, the
event-based camera in this work costs 10% as much as a corresponding
framing camera system. Third, the data volume produced by a real-time
VRK experiment is dramatically reduced. High-speed framing cameras
exhibit data rates of several GB/s making long-term measurements impossible.
In contrast, an event-based camera only produces several kB of data
per second and even a 20 min continuous measurement uses only a few
100 MB of storage capacity. However, low-cost event-cameras have issues
with accurate time stamping of pixel hits. It is therefore necessary
to work under conditions where the pixel hits from individual laser
shots can be clearly distinguished from each other.We emphasize
the importance of a fast phosphor since event-based
cameras are sensitive to photon flux and not to the total number of
emitted photons like integrating CMOS/CCD framing cameras. We have
also performed experiments using a common P43 phosphor screen, which
has a decay time of 1.6 ms. Besides a significantly reduced count
rate on the camera, it was not possibly to separate ions from single
laser shots in time. For the DAVIS346 camera used in this work in
combination with a fast phosphor screen, we estimate the maximum possible
ionization rate to be around 2 kHz, which would enable measurements
with a continuous time resolution of 500 μs, which is sufficient
for a variety of applications. We emphasize that many imaging experiments
operated at high repetition rates do not require an event camera with
ns-time stamp accuracy if they only detect single m/z ratios. The DAVIS346 is about 5% the cost of
such event cameras that provide nanosecond time resolution. We hope
that this work might make the use of event cameras more available
in ion imaging applications.
Authors: K Amini; S Blake; M Brouard; M B Burt; E Halford; A Lauer; C S Slater; J W L Lee; C Vallance Journal: Rev Sci Instrum Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 1.523
Authors: Michael N R Ashfold; N Hendrik Nahler; Andrew J Orr-Ewing; Olivier P J Vieuxmaire; Rachel L Toomes; Theofanis N Kitsopoulos; Ivan Anton Garcia; Dmitri A Chestakov; Shiou-Min Wu; David H Parker Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2005-10-18 Impact factor: 3.676