| Literature DB >> 35317220 |
Shankar Narayan S1,2, Sunanda Saha3, Anuradha Bhattacharjee2.
Abstract
Recent researches on COVID 19 has been extended to analyze the various morphological and anatomical changes in a patient's body due to the invasion of the virus. These latest studies have concluded that there happens a high rise in the viscosity of the blood in a COVID 19 patient, supported by the extensive analysis of the clinical data. In the present paper, a mathematical model in the form of a differential equation system has been proposed to disclose the various changes that occur in the flow across the stenosis of an arterial segment. The consequences of the hyperviscosity of blood on the blood flow characteristics in a stenosed artery are analyzed by solving the model using a finite element method (FEM) solver. A laminar flow coupled with solid mechanics through the Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) interface has been studied using an Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) method. For the first time, the mathematical model was used to analyze the hyper-viscous flow condition in COVID 19 patients. The present research is mainly based on the numerous clinical reports enlisting the various morphological, hematological, and rheological changes in the blood.Entities:
Keywords: Intima; Newtonian viscosity; Thrombosis; Wall shear stress
Year: 2021 PMID: 35317220 PMCID: PMC8382661 DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Results Eng ISSN: 2590-1230
Principles of functional analysis and fluid dynamics.
| Sl.No. | Principle | Statement | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| For any n-dimensional vectors v and w, | [ | ||
| For a bounded domain | [ | ||
| For | [ | ||
| For a domain | [ | ||
| For | [ | ||
| If | [ | ||
| Let | [ |
Fig. 1(a)-Geometry of the domain & (b)-Meshing near the stenosis.
Mesh details.
| Sl.No. | Mesh descriptions | Values |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Triangular elements | 66,522 |
| 2 | Quadrilateral elements | 4660 |
| 3 | Edge elements | 3273 |
| 4 | Vertex elements | 10 |
| 5 | Minimum element quality | 0.3333 |
| 6 | Average element quality | 0.903 |
| 7 | Element area ratio | 0.04572 |
| 8 | Mesh area | 111 |
| 9 | Maximum growth rate | 2.329 |
| 10 | Average growth rate | 1.272 |
Fig. 2(a)-Mesh quality near the stenosis & (b)-Pre and Post stenotic regions displayed explicitly.
Numerical and physical parameter values.
| Parameters | Values | References |
|---|---|---|
| BLOOD (FLUID) | ||
| Density | 1060 kg/m3 | [ |
| Viscosity (Normal) | 0.0015 Pa s | |
| Hyper-viscosity | 0.0042 Pa s | |
| Lame Parameter, A | [ | |
| Lame Parameter, B | ||
| Density | 960 kg/m3 | |
| Initial Pressure | 10,000 Pa | [ |
| Inlet velocity | 1.18 m/s | |
| Outlet pressure | 9332.57 Pa | |
Fig. 3Velocity profiles for normal and hyper-viscous cases respectively.
Fig. 4Velocity streamlines for normal and hyper-viscous cases respectively.
Fig. 5Pressure profiles for normal and hyper-viscous cases respectively.
Fig. 6Von Mises Stress for normal and hyper-viscous cases respectively (post stenotic case).
Fig. 7Von Mises Stress for normal and hyper-viscous cases respectively (pre-stenotic case).
Fig. 8Axial velocity for normal and hyper-viscous cases respectively.
Fig. 9Axial pressure for normal and hyper-viscous cases respectively.
Fig. 10WSS profile along the lumen-intima interface for normal and hyper-viscous cases respectively.
Comparison for normal and COVID 19 infected blood flow parameters.
| Flow parameters | Normal case (Stenosis + Non-COVID) | Hyper-viscous case (Stenosis + COVID) |
|---|---|---|
| Axial velocity | Normal | Higher |
| Axial pressure | Normal | Lower |
| Number of recirculation zones (Post-stenotic) | 2 | 1 |
| Pressure recovery rate (Post-stenotic) | Faster | Slower |
| Wall shear stress (Post-stenotic) | Normal | Higher |
| Von Mises stress (Post-stenotic) | Lower | Higher |