Victoria Frye1,2,3, Mark Q Paige1, Steven Gordon4, David Matthews5, Geneva Musgrave6, Emily Greene1,2, Mark Kornegay6, Davida Farhat2,3, Philip H Smith1, DaShawn Usher7, Jo C Phelan3, Beryl A Koblin7, Vaughn Taylor-Akutagawa4. 1. Department of Community Health and Social Medicine, City University of New York School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 2. Laboratory of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 4. Gay Men of African Descent (GMAD), Brooklyn, NY, USA. 5. Brooklyn Men Konnect/Bridging Access to Care (BMK), Brooklyn, NY, USA. 6. Independent consultant, New York, NY, USA. 7. Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
Background: HIV stigma and homophobia are barriers to access to HIV prevention and treatment services. Project CHHANGE, Challenge HIV Stigma and Homophobia and Gain Empowerment, was a multicomponent intervention designed to reduce community-level HIV stigma and homophobia via workshops, space-based events and bus shelter ads delivered to community-based organizations and neighborhood residents in a high HIV prevalence, primarily African-American, Black and/or Afro-Caribbean, neighborhood in New York City (NYC). Methods: Serial cross-sectional, street intercept surveys among residents of the invention neighborhood and matched control neighborhood were conducted before and after the intervention. Propensity score matching and generalized estimating equation regression models assessed the impact of CHHANGE on HIV stigma and homophobia. HIV testing service utilization data were assessed and multivariable models of self-reported HIV testing among post-intervention street survey respondents were built. Results: We did not find a significant treatment effect on HIV stigma and homophobia among residents of the intervention neighborhood as compared with control community residents. However, HIV testing increased by 350% at the testing site in the intervention community after the intervention implementation. Further, lower HIV stigma, attending an HIV stigma workshop and having friends or family living with HIV were independently associated with past six-month HIV testing among post-intervention respondents in both neighborhoods. Conclusions: CHHANGE was feasible and acceptable to community residents. Evaluating community-level interventions is challenging. Our triangulated approach yielded somewhat conflicting results, which may be due to design limitations. Further research is needed to understand whether and how CHHANGE affected HIV testing.
Background: HIV stigma and homophobia are barriers to access to HIV prevention and treatment services. Project CHHANGE, Challenge HIV Stigma and Homophobia and Gain Empowerment, was a multicomponent intervention designed to reduce community-level HIV stigma and homophobia via workshops, space-based events and bus shelter ads delivered to community-based organizations and neighborhood residents in a high HIV prevalence, primarily African-American, Black and/or Afro-Caribbean, neighborhood in New York City (NYC). Methods: Serial cross-sectional, street intercept surveys among residents of the invention neighborhood and matched control neighborhood were conducted before and after the intervention. Propensity score matching and generalized estimating equation regression models assessed the impact of CHHANGE on HIV stigma and homophobia. HIV testing service utilization data were assessed and multivariable models of self-reported HIV testing among post-intervention street survey respondents were built. Results: We did not find a significant treatment effect on HIV stigma and homophobia among residents of the intervention neighborhood as compared with control community residents. However, HIV testing increased by 350% at the testing site in the intervention community after the intervention implementation. Further, lower HIV stigma, attending an HIV stigma workshop and having friends or family living with HIV were independently associated with past six-month HIV testing among post-intervention respondents in both neighborhoods. Conclusions: CHHANGE was feasible and acceptable to community residents. Evaluating community-level interventions is challenging. Our triangulated approach yielded somewhat conflicting results, which may be due to design limitations. Further research is needed to understand whether and how CHHANGE affected HIV testing.
Authors: Katie B Biello; Catherine E Oldenburg; Jennifer A Mitty; Elizabeth F Closson; Kenneth H Mayer; Steven A Safren; Matthew J Mimiaga Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-01
Authors: Victoria Frye; Mark Q Paige; Steven Gordon; David Matthews; Geneva Musgrave; Mark Kornegay; Emily Greene; Jo C Phelan; Beryl A Koblin; Vaughn Taylor-Akutagawa Journal: Eval Program Plann Date: 2017-03-19
Authors: M Nebot; D D Celentano; L Burwell; A Davis; M Davis; M Polacsek; J Santelli Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Sharon B Mannheimer; Lei Wang; Leo Wilton; Hong Van Tieu; Carlos Del Rio; Susan Buchbinder; Sheldon Fields; Sara Glick; Matthew B Connor; Vanessa Cummings; Susan H Eshleman; Beryl Koblin; Kenneth H Mayer Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Priscila Lutete; David W Matthews; Nasim S Sabounchi; Mark Q Paige; David W Lounsbury; Noah Rodriguez; Natalie Echevarria; DaShawn Usher; Julian J Walker; Alexis Dickerson; Joseph Hillesheim; Victoria Frye Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 11.561